On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 07:14:59AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
> I also realize that Developers prefer that Bugs should not be REOPENED
> because it is unlikely that the bug a user finds now is exactly the same
> problem that was solved before (even if the apparent result is the same and
> therefore the bu
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 10:34:01AM +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote:
> The bigger problem is the following:
> User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A
> disagrees and puts the state to
> 1) REOPENED
> 2) NEEDINFO
>
> Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
he user can
change to MOREINFO, and adds additional info.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-REPOENED-Status-tp4117474p4117552.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Lib
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 11:00:09 +0200, Pedro wrote:
Florian Reisinger wrote
The bigger problem is the following:
User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User
A
disagrees and puts the state to
1) REOPENED
2) NEEDINFO
Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 10:34:01 +0200, Florian Reisinger
wrote:
Hi,
The bigger problem is the following:
User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User
A disagrees and puts the state to
1) REOPENED
2) NEEDINFO
Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
Liebe G
BAD option...
Just my 2 cents.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-REPOENED-Status-tp4117474p4117517.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing li
Hi,
The bigger problem is the following:
User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A
disagrees and puts the state to
1) REOPENED
2) NEEDINFO
Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
> Am 02.08.2014 um 08:44 schrieb To
Hi Joel,
Good post. I have installed your note in the German Wiki.
Regards
Jochen
Am 01.08.2014 18:34, schrieb Joel Madero:
Hi All,
I'm noticing quite a few QA members using REOPENED incorrectly so this
is just a reminder.
REOPENED is for a bug that has been marked as FIXED by a develope
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:43:06 +0200, Joel Madero
wrote:
Hey Florian,
Hi Joel,
I do not remember any direct way from WFM to UNCONFIRMED. I have not
done
much lately, but REOPENED was the only "meaningful" way to get it out of
resolved state... Anyway, thanks for highlighting :)
Yeah -
Hey Florian,
Hi Joel,
>
> I do not remember any direct way from WFM to UNCONFIRMED. I have not done
> much lately, but REOPENED was the only "meaningful" way to get it out of
> resolved state... Anyway, thanks for highlighting :)
>
Yeah - best to go from WORKSFORME to NEEDINFO and then to UNCONFI
Hi Joel,
I do not remember any direct way from WFM to UNCONFIRMED. I have not done much
lately, but REOPENED was the only "meaningful" way to get it out of resolved
state... Anyway, thanks for highlighting :)
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
> Am 01.08.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Joel Madero
Hi All,
I'm noticing quite a few QA members using REOPENED incorrectly so this is
just a reminder.
REOPENED is for a bug that has been marked as FIXED by a developer and is
currently assigned to that developer. It is *not *for a bug that has been
marked as WORKSFORME (ie. never confirmed or a bug
12 matches
Mail list logo
