On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 07:14:59AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
> I also realize that Developers prefer that Bugs should not be REOPENED
> because it is unlikely that the bug a user finds now is exactly the same
> problem that was solved before (even if the apparent result is the same and
> therefore the bu
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 10:34:01AM +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote:
> The bigger problem is the following:
> User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A
> disagrees and puts the state to
> 1) REOPENED
> 2) NEEDINFO
>
> Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
Hi Tommy, all
Tommy wrote
> pedro take a look at my other post. we probably need to change the WFM
> status change behaviour to something more logical and easier to handle.
It obviously needs a solution. If REOPENED is reserved for developers (and
in that case it should be visible ONLY for the
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 11:00:09 +0200, Pedro wrote:
Florian Reisinger wrote
The bigger problem is the following:
User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User
A
disagrees and puts the state to
1) REOPENED
2) NEEDINFO
Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 10:34:01 +0200, Florian Reisinger
wrote:
Hi,
The bigger problem is the following:
User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User
A disagrees and puts the state to
1) REOPENED
2) NEEDINFO
Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
Liebe G
Florian Reisinger wrote
> The bigger problem is the following:
> User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A
> disagrees and puts the state to
> 1) REOPENED
> 2) NEEDINFO
>
> Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
+1
Maybe QA people become aware of this unl
Hi,
The bigger problem is the following:
User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A
disagrees and puts the state to
1) REOPENED
2) NEEDINFO
Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
> Am 02.08.2014 um 08:44 schrieb To
Hi Joel,
Good post. I have installed your note in the German Wiki.
Regards
Jochen
Am 01.08.2014 18:34, schrieb Joel Madero:
Hi All,
I'm noticing quite a few QA members using REOPENED incorrectly so this
is just a reminder.
REOPENED is for a bug that has been marked as FIXED by a develope
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:43:06 +0200, Joel Madero
wrote:
Hey Florian,
Hi Joel,
I do not remember any direct way from WFM to UNCONFIRMED. I have not
done
much lately, but REOPENED was the only "meaningful" way to get it out of
resolved state... Anyway, thanks for highlighting :)
Yeah -
Hey Florian,
Hi Joel,
>
> I do not remember any direct way from WFM to UNCONFIRMED. I have not done
> much lately, but REOPENED was the only "meaningful" way to get it out of
> resolved state... Anyway, thanks for highlighting :)
>
Yeah - best to go from WORKSFORME to NEEDINFO and then to UNCONFI
Hi Joel,
I do not remember any direct way from WFM to UNCONFIRMED. I have not done much
lately, but REOPENED was the only "meaningful" way to get it out of resolved
state... Anyway, thanks for highlighting :)
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
> Am 01.08.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Joel Madero
11 matches
Mail list logo
