a Longtin
To: arthur torrey
Cc: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
Sent: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 05:19:49 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Updating the High Priority List
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 12:16:22AM +, arthur_tor...@comcast.net wrote:
> The thing I've been grumbling about
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 12:16:22AM +, arthur_tor...@comcast.net wrote:
> The thing I've been grumbling about almost since I started using Free
> Software all to many years ago is the lack of a competent 3-D CAD package
> LibreCAD is OK for 2D, and it is being actively maintained and work
On 11/02/16 12:04, Fabio Pesari wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 11:13 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> As suggested in my earlier email, I feel the list should be reserved for
>> things that just about everybody needs to use.
>
> In general, I would agree, but those specific programs which haven't yet
> been
On 02/11/2016 11:13 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> As suggested in my earlier email, I feel the list should be reserved for
> things that just about everybody needs to use.
In general, I would agree, but those specific programs which haven't yet
been replaced can be an obstacle to GNU/Linux adoption i
On 11/02/16 11:04, Fabio Pesari wrote:
> On 02/10/2016 08:54 PM, al3xu5 / dotcommon wrote:
>>
>> Also if we had a very good 2D/3D CAD libre software but missing a full DWG
>> support, CAD users still would not use it.
>> But having a full DWG support is really hard... I think quite impossible: DW
On 02/10/2016 08:54 PM, al3xu5 / dotcommon wrote:
>
> Also if we had a very good 2D/3D CAD libre software but missing a full DWG
> support, CAD users still would not use it.
> But having a full DWG support is really hard... I think quite impossible: DWG
> is closed and Autodesk change it often (i.e
Il giorno sabato 06/02/2016 00:16:22 CET
arthur_tor...@comcast.net ha scritto:
> The thing I've been grumbling about almost since I started using Free
> Software all to many years ago is the lack of a competent 3-D CAD
> package LibreCAD is OK for 2D, and it is being actively maintained and
>
El 7 de febrero de 2016 12:10:09 GMT+00:00, Fabio Pesari
escribió:
On 02/07/2016 11:12 AM, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote:
http://www.freecadweb.org/ used by one of our makers to do a cnc
machine. I believe she uploaded it somewhere.
...
I have used solidworks, it is bloated and not one use
On 02/07/2016 11:12 AM, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote:
>
> http://www.freecadweb.org/ used by one of our makers to do a cnc machine. I
> believe she uploaded it somewhere.
> ...
> I have used solidworks, it is bloated and not one user uses even 3% of it's
> capabilities.
Andrés, you seem to know
w.freecadweb.org/wiki/index.php?title=FEM_Module
That can be exported to FEA tools such as https://www.csc.fi/web/elmer
There is an agreed standard (probably not official) file format for FEA forget
what it is as it has been many years since I used it. But even proprietary
software uses it.
&g
On 02/06/2016 01:16 AM, arthur_tor...@comcast.net wrote:
> The thing I've been grumbling about almost since I started using Free
> Software all to many years ago is the lack of a competent 3-D CAD package
> LibreCAD is OK for 2D, and it is being actively maintained and worked on,
> but it i
On 04/02/16 19:31, John Sullivan wrote:
> We have a much-delayed update ready to publish (see
> https://www.fsf.org/news/fsf-commences-review-of-high-priority-free-software-projects-list-your-input-is-needed).
> After that's published, we will revisit our updating process and
> announce the next
ke a drawing from anything else
ART
Original TRIMMED message ==
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:35:31 +0100
From: Fabio Pesari
To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
Subject: [libreplanet-discuss] Updating the High Priority List
Message-ID: <56b30d53.8060...@gnu.org>
We have a much-delayed update ready to publish (see
https://www.fsf.org/news/fsf-commences-review-of-high-priority-free-software-projects-list-your-input-is-needed).
After that's published, we will revisit our updating process and
announce the next opportunity for feedback or what the revision proc
On 02/04/2016 02:48 PM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
> Over the years I've helped and continue helping people migrate to better
> and more IT freedom, but now all these devices are imposing themselves
> and giving proprietary software a huge comeback I didn't expect. It's
> getting harder to argue wi
I'll second the priority of mobile devices.
And I would want people on the projects to think
about privacy and control of the data.
Mary-Anne
Le 2016-02-04 03:35, Fabio Pesari a écrit :
Which free programs need more attention in
order to replace their proprietary counterparts?
- Health-related (personal health data) and mobile software, but also
hardware
I recently came across this project: http://ggc.sourceforge.net/
"GNU Gluco C
On 02/04/2016 10:08 AM, Koz Ross wrote:
> Free software drivers for 3D support, especially on SoCs. To be honest
> though, all of the free software 3D drivers right now could use more
> help to get more working.
If someone got the Raspberry Pi family working without any proprietary
blobs, it'd be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Free software drivers for 3D support, especially on SoCs. To be honest
though, all of the free software 3D drivers right now could use more
help to get more working.
- --
Koz Ross
www.retro-freedom.nz
If you aren't using GPG, you should be!
https:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/priority-projects/
This list is severely outdated. What about we propose new high-priority
projects? What proprietary programs (or network services without free
servers) do you or the people around you use _daily_ that haven't been
replaced by free software? Which fre
20 matches
Mail list logo
