Re: Fix: Interlibrary dependencies SCO Uw7

2001-04-18 Thread Matthew Schalit
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:06 am, Matthew Schalit wrote: Hi Gary, Thanks for the followup. > If you are sure that it is okay to link non-PIC objects from a static archive > into a shared library, then this is the right thing to do. You can test this > by man

Re: Fix: Interlibrary dependencies SCO Uw7

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:06 am, Matthew Schalit wrote: > Thank you for all your work on making libtool so > portable and necessitating that I learn how to spell > dependencies :o) You guys do all the hard work. I just apply your patches =)O| > I checked out the CVS libtool today,

Re: Darwin and archive_cmds quoting

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Kevin, Thanks for the analysis. I think we need to take a careful look at the (complicated) echo testing in libtool.m4 and figure out how this behaviour is not noticed by the current tests. I won't have time to do this myself until later in the Summer (in time for libtool-1.5), so if you

Re: Duplicates in library auto-dependencies

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 19 April 2001 1:01 am, Michael Matz wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Robert Boehne wrote: > > I'm in a bad situation with the loss of complete and draconian > > duplicate removal in dependency tracking. I've got 44 or so > > libraries that depend on each other, usually not in a loop ;P

Re: Duplicates in library auto-dependencies

2001-04-18 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Robert Boehne wrote: > I'm in a bad situation with the loss of complete and draconian > duplicate removal in dependency tracking. I've got 44 or so > libraries that depend on each other, usually not in a loop ;P > So by the time the 10th library is built, there are thou

Duplicates in library auto-dependencies

2001-04-18 Thread Robert Boehne
I'm in a bad situation with the loss of complete and draconian duplicate removal in dependency tracking. I've got 44 or so libraries that depend on each other, usually not in a loop ;P So by the time the 10th library is built, there are thousands of duplicate -lm -lc -lstdc++ -lgcc options with

Re: Downtime... musings... libtool-1.4

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan writes: > > Nup. Sorry. There is no way to log in to savannah at the moment, > > as there is still no SSL certificate =(O| I'm Ccing Loic, who might > > be able to shed some light, since I can't find any reference

Re: Downtime... musings... libtool-1.4

2001-04-18 Thread Thomas Tanner
Hi Gary, On 18-Apr-2001 Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > I'd rather not, since there is a difficult merge on the other side of the > release and I won't have the time to help Alexandre with that in 2 weeks if > we wait that long =(O| I really need to finalise 1.4 so that I can > concentrate on my boo

Re: ltconfig fails during 'configure'

2001-04-18 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> Ok, I changed AC_CANNONICAL_HOST to AC_CANNONICAL_SYSTEM in Robert> configure.ac and it works. However, this doesn't appear to be Robert> the 'proper' fix because AC_CANNONICAL_SYSTEM is obsolete. I Robert> also have tried AC_C

Re: Downtime... musings... libtool-1.4

2001-04-18 Thread loic
Gary V. Vaughan writes: > > Nup. Sorry. There is no way to log in to savannah at the moment, > as there is still no SSL certificate =(O| I'm Ccing Loic, who might > be able to shed some light, since I can't find any reference to the > certification issue since the last one was regenerated

Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually... Robert Boehne has already merged my changes > into the multi-language-branch. Okay, great. I'll evaluate your patch tonight (GMT). Cheers, Gary. > Dan > > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001 > > > >

Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001 > > > > > - When building libtool without run-time-linking, my changes do still > > > create a lib.a. However, it is an actual archive containing the > > > shared object (just like the

Re: Downtime... musings... libtool-1.4

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Thomas, On Tuesday 17 April 2001 6:11 pm, Thomas Tanner wrote: > Gary, would you please delay the release of libtool 1.4 and > give me two weeks to fix all the old bugs in the ILD code and libltdl > (or at least to verify that they've already been fixed)? I'd rather not, since there is a

Re: Downtime... musings... libtool-1.4

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 4:35 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 17, 2001, Thomas Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Gary, Alexandre and the rest of the team! > > Gee! So you're still alive, after all! You had got me worried :-) Wow. Hi Thomas. I'm afraid I didn't even list you as a