On Wednesday 18 April 2001 5:43 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Content-Type: /; name="Attachment: 0"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description:
Okay to install... I wouldn't have thought we ned an okay for
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 4:35 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 17, 2001, Thomas Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gary, Alexandre and the rest of the team!
Gee! So you're still alive, after all! You had got me worried :-)
Wow. Hi Thomas. I'm afraid I didn't even list you as a
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually... Robert Boehne has already merged my changes
into the multi-language-branch.
Okay, great. I'll evaluate your patch tonight (GMT).
Cheers,
Gary.
Dan
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001
Do you
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001
- When building libtool without run-time-linking, my changes do still
create a libname.a. However, it is an actual archive containing the
shared object (just like the quirky
Gary V. Vaughan writes:
Nup. Sorry. There is no way to log in to savannah at the moment,
as there is still no SSL certificate =(O| I'm Ccing Loic, who might
be able to shed some light, since I can't find any reference to the
certification issue since the last one was regenerated in
Hi Gary,
On 18-Apr-2001 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I'd rather not, since there is a difficult merge on the other side of the
release and I won't have the time to help Alexandre with that in 2 weeks if
we wait that long =(O| I really need to finalise 1.4 so that I can
concentrate on my book
"Robert" == Robert Boehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Ok, I changed AC_CANNONICAL_HOST to AC_CANNONICAL_SYSTEM in
Robert configure.ac and it works. However, this doesn't appear to be
Robert the 'proper' fix because AC_CANNONICAL_SYSTEM is obsolete. I
Robert also have tried
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan writes:
Nup. Sorry. There is no way to log in to savannah at the moment,
as there is still no SSL certificate =(O| I'm Ccing Loic, who might
be able to shed some light, since I can't find any reference to
I'm in a bad situation with the loss of complete and draconian
duplicate removal in dependency tracking. I've got 44 or so
libraries that depend on each other, usually not in a loop ;P
So by the time the 10th library is built, there are thousands
of duplicate -lm -lc -lstdc++ -lgcc options with
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Robert Boehne wrote:
I'm in a bad situation with the loss of complete and draconian
duplicate removal in dependency tracking. I've got 44 or so
libraries that depend on each other, usually not in a loop ;P
So by the time the 10th library is built, there are
On Thursday 19 April 2001 1:01 am, Michael Matz wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Robert Boehne wrote:
I'm in a bad situation with the loss of complete and draconian
duplicate removal in dependency tracking. I've got 44 or so
libraries that depend on each other, usually not in a loop ;P
So
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:06 am, Matthew Schalit wrote:
Hi Gary,
Thanks for the followup.
If you are sure that it is okay to link non-PIC objects from a static archive
into a shared library, then this is the right thing to do. You can test this
by
12 matches
Mail list logo
