Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 18 Jan 2024 11:25, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On 1/18/24, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 17 Jan 2024 20:07, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > [...] > >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52253 > > > > doesn't look like a regression. it can wait. > > It's a regression from 2.2.6, later versions have th

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-18 Thread Ileana Dumitrescu
On 18/01/2024 08:41, Mike Frysinger wrote: i was looking in HACKING & README & the manual & in a clean tree. if you bootstrap, you get the README-release file which explains things. i posted 2 patches which fix `make distcheck` for me. i'll wait a little to see if there's any feedback on them

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-18 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 1/18/24, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 17 Jan 2024 20:07, Ozkan Sezer wrote: [...] >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52253 > > doesn't look like a regression. it can wait. It's a regression from 2.2.6, later versions have the issue, so how is it not a regression?

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 17 Jan 2024 18:43, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 17 Jan 2024 16:09, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: > > I'll need some time figuring out the release process, but otherwise I > > should be able to get an alpha release out soon. Mike has been helpful > > and has merged in many patches over the past few da

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 17 Jan 2024 16:09, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: > I'll need some time figuring out the release process, but otherwise I > should be able to get an alpha release out soon. Mike has been helpful > and has merged in many patches over the past few days. there doesn't seem to be libtool-specific relea

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 17 Jan 2024 20:07, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > Please remember to check with debbugs.gnu.org: > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=libtool;max-bugs=100;base-order=1;bug-rev=1 > > There are plenty of bugs in there. E.g.: we're always going to have a bug backlog. if there's something sp

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Ileana Dumitrescu
On 17/01/2024 19:07, Ozkan Sezer wrote: Please remember to check with debbugs.gnu.org: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=libtool;max-bugs=100;base-order=1;bug-rev=1 There are plenty of bugs in there. E.g.: Yes, there's quite a lot that have piled up. I'll do my best to triage

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-01-17 20:07:55 +0300, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > Please remember to check with debbugs.gnu.org: > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=libtool;max-bugs=100;base-order=1;bug-rev=1 > > There are plenty of bugs in there. E.g.: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52253 >

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Ozkan Sezer
Please remember to check with debbugs.gnu.org: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=libtool;max-bugs=100;base-order=1;bug-rev=1 There are plenty of bugs in there. E.g.: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52253 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45738 https://deb

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 17 Jan 2024 15:56, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Looking at that, it seems the bootstrap and bootstrap.conf scripts are > really old. seems like they're up-to-date to me. it's using the fork: https://github.com/gnulib-modules/bootstrap > Do we have any GitLab CI/CD testing for libtool? there is n

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Simon Josefsson via Discussion list for the GNU libtool shared library maintenance tool
Ileana Dumitrescu writes: >> On 16/01/2024 22:59, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> If what's on git master passes self checks, I would package it and >> prepare an alpha release and announce that to pretesters mailing list. >> Assuming there is nothing in git master that really upsets you and needs >> t

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-17 Thread Ileana Dumitrescu
> On 16/01/2024 22:59, Simon Josefsson wrote: If what's on git master passes self checks, I would package it and prepare an alpha release and announce that to pretesters mailing list. Assuming there is nothing in git master that really upsets you and needs to be backed out. Don't look at more

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-16 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-01-16 15:44:08 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 13 Jan 2024 14:49, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: > > My short term plans are to review the numerous mailing list patches and > > get them merged in. This will be an easy and productive first step for > > me and libtool. I will also look at the v

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-16 Thread Simon Josefsson via Discussion list for the GNU libtool shared library maintenance tool
Welcome Ileana! Mike Frysinger writes: > On 13 Jan 2024 14:49, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: >> My short term plans are to review the numerous mailing list patches and >> get them merged in. This will be an easy and productive first step for >> me and libtool. I will also look at the various distro

Re: Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-16 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 13 Jan 2024 14:49, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: > My short term plans are to review the numerous mailing list patches and > get them merged in. This will be an easy and productive first step for > me and libtool. I will also look at the various distro patches and see > if any of them are fit to b

Introducing a new maintainer of libtool

2024-01-13 Thread Ileana Dumitrescu
Hi all, I am Ileana Dumitrescu, a new maintainer of libtool. To give some background on myself, I have been contributing to Debian over the past few years. Presently, I am a Debian Maintainer and the maintainer for zvbi, which utilizes libtool. To reference my application email: """ My shor