On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> For 2.0 release, I think we label it as "API change only" release
> unless critical bug fixes are required. Let's keep it that way.
> I will not add any other issues to the 2.0 milestone unless there
> are other API changes required.
> https://
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2013.03.13 05:22, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> http://dx.com/p/d1201-ez-usb-fx2lp-cy7c68013a-usb-development-board-blue-179473
> for less than €10/$13 with free (but very lengthy) shipping.
> There's also e-bay where CY7C68013A clones should be eas
On 2013.03.13 05:22, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> It is a simple board and there are many similar boards like this
> in the web. Some of them are quite cheap (US$10 - US$20, but the
> shipment can be a problem).
> http://detail.tmall.com/item.htm?spm=a230r.1.10.1.al4bvD&id=16344323104
> http://item.taobao
On 2013.03.13 07:07, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>From my (perhaps naive) point of view, it seems much more priority is
> being given to edge features like WinCE support, rather than core
> issues with the library.
Glad you make that point, as it'll give me an opportunity to explain a
few things.
Fir
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:37:35PM +0800, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:30:19PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 09:32:05AM -
Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
> In the time I have been using libusb there has always been a single
> feature that I was missing: The ability to get a notification when a new
> device is connected (or disconnected for that matter), and thereby
> remove the need for continuous rescans of the usb bus.
>
Thank you very much for your reply. This seems to be exactly what I was
looking for. I can't believe I missed it on the roadmap.
The disrupted file transfer is a windows only thing and to be honost I
have not tried it with libusbx, only libusb-1.0.8 so things might behave
differently today.
I'll
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
> In the time I have been using libusb there has always been a single
> feature that I was missing: The ability to get a notification when a new
> device is connected (or disconnected for that matter), and thereby
> remove the need for co
Hi list
I have been made aware of the libusbx project recently, and there were
much rejoicing...
I found many bugs (especially on windows) that were fixed compared with
libusb so the choice of changeover was an easy one - thank you for that.
In the time I have been using libusb there has always
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I think the main issue is that he can't actually make his driver code
> work correctly without things like libusb_handle_events_check (which
> makes sense to me) and also libusb_resetep (which also makes sense for
> me on Linux).
I am not s
On 12 March 2013 22:42, Pete Batard wrote:
> I guess I'll bite, and fill you in on a few details, to try to offer a
> different perspective from what you seem to _perceive_.
Sure, it was meant somewhat tongue-in-cheek, so I appreciate the
response. I'm not deliberately trolling.
> Ergo, the time
11 matches
Mail list logo
