, so this may turn out to be a really bad idea.
On 09/30/2012 08:06 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.09.30 01:04, Chuck Cook wrote:
>>From my point of view. I would like to see libusb-1.0 go through
>> another iteration or two.
> I definitely want that too, and I'm happy
and
mobile devices. Now that is a project goal!
Chuck
On 09/30/2012 06:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/30/2012 02:04 AM, Chuck Cook wrote:
>> From my point of view. I would like to see libusb-1.0 go through
>> another iteration or two. Remove the depende
From my point of view. I would like to see libusb-1.0 go through
another iteration or two. Remove the dependency on WinUSB and the other
dlls. Get as many of the core functions working cross platform as
possible.
We may eventually need to migrate to a 2.0 version. But I would rather
not s
I just completed am make ~ install from source for a Vista 32 bit
machine.Uneventful and appears to be working.
Now my Linux & Windows machines are both synced to version 14.I
guess 13 really is an unlucky number :-D
Chuck
On 09/28/2012 07:25 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.09.28 03:1
On 09/22/2012 08:18 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 22 September 2012 00:34, Chuck Cook wrote:
>> What surprised me was that a usb library was crashing the system. What
>> does the USB bus have to do with the system login?
> Support for fancy non HID or accessibility input dev
What is the OS?
1.0.13 was just released.
On 09/21/2012 06:16 PM, Frank Hibbeln wrote:
Hi All,
I'm interfacing an application to a sensor that is "custom" USB
device. I was using libusbx v 1.0.12 and
experiencing a major problem with timeouts reading from the device.
I'm now trying v1.0.13
wrote:
> On 2012.09.21 17:52, Chuck Cook wrote:
>> So far version: 1.0.13 nano: 10575 appears to be working without problems.
> I'm happy to hear that. Thanks for the report.
>
> Regards,
>
> /Pete
>
>
I was building the file wrong. Han's version worked:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=320282 without
problems.
So I dug into how he built it and came up with the following:
#libusb build script
LANG=C
export LANG
unset DISPLAY
CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOUR
I have run into a rather strange problem that appears to be related to
libusbx-13 on a Fedora 17 x64 box.
My build commands:
./configure --libdir=/lib64 --prefix=/usr
make
make install
At this point all seems well. The libraries are where they are supposed
to be, headers & package config files
I think I will remove any existing libusb-1.0 traces. Then re-build as
per your last post and see what happens.
Chuck
On 09/20/2012 05:04 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> NB: I also realize that your issue was with compile rather than runtime
> with shared lib, but I'm pretty sure it boils down to the
wrote:
> On 20 September 2012 13:44, Chuck Cook wrote:
>> //,libusb_get_port_number(deviceList[selItem])
> Pretty sure you're still using libusb and not libusbx at runtime.
> get_port_number is one of the calls we added early on, and that libusb
> does not
s one line causes a compile problem. I found that
call listed in libusb.h, but the compiler cannot seem to find the actual
routine in the library.
Chuck
On 09/20/2012 02:23 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Chuck Cook wrote:
>> I am having problems compiling a
I am having problems compiling a program against RC2. I may have used
the wrong options when building or installing the library.
Could somebody list the correct ./configure , make & make install
options for a Fedora 17 x64 machine?
Chuck
Change /libusb_version.describe/ from the rather useless string it is
now to: "www.libusbx.org" or something similar.
So far RC2 is working on my FC17 x64 without problems.
Chuck
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exc
How about returning NO_ERROR for code >= 0
and UNKNOWN_ERROR when code < 0 and doesn't match a defined error
On 09/15/2012 06:31 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Note that for the code 0 which means success resp. completed we have an
> overlap in the codes. This is not a problem since normally one would
> http://libusb-winusb-wip.googlecode.com/files/winusb%20driver.zip ?
> That's the page which mentions it is outdated and refers to libusbx.
>
> Or are there some other drivers available that are signed - especially
> for 64 bit Windows?
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:53 PM
You still need WinUSB for now.
http://libusbx.org/
On 08/23/2012 07:23 AM, Satz Klauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found libusbx via a link at project libusb-winusb-wip and I'm a bit
> confused now.
>
> Until now when using "old" libusb on Windows some WinUSB drivers have
> been mandatory (that's what I'm
On 07/13/2012 09:06 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.07.13 12:56, Toby Gray wrote:
>> Firstly I apologise for sending my message body as HTML, I've clearly
>> not figured out how to force Thunderbird to always send as plain text.
>
Go into the thunderturkey address book, edit the libusb-devel ent
At the very bottom of Makefile.am :
dist-up: dist
rm -rf $(reldir)
mkdir -p $(reldir)
cp $(distdir).tar.bz2 $(reldir)
rsync -rv $(reldir)
frs.sourceforge.net:/home/frs/project/l/li/libusb/libusb-1.0/
rm -rf $(reldir)
The rsync command appears to point to a libusb relate
Aaaah yes, you are correct. Then this would indicate his device has no
configuration descriptors.
Chuck
On 06/27/2012 09:57 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Chuck Cook wrote:
>
>> Your config index is wrong. Zero should not be used at all according to
>> the
Your config index is wrong. Zero should not be used at all according to
the USB spec. Try "1".
Chuck
On 06/27/2012 06:31 AM, Jach Fong wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I continue my test on the libusbx-1.0.12-win under WinXP SP3 by
> using a HID device. This time I follow steps in example xusb.c:
>
> 1
Okay, I guess the list is working correctly. I guess I am getting two
of everything since people are cc libusbx-dev & libusb-dev in their
replies.
On 06/16/2012 10:18 AM, Chuck Cook wrote:
> TEST REPLY
>
> On 06/16/2012 10:03 AM, Chuck Cook wrote:
>> PLEASE IGNORE
>&g
TEST REPLY
On 06/16/2012 10:03 AM, Chuck Cook wrote:
> PLEASE IGNORE
> This is a mailing list test. For some strange reason I seem to be
> getting two copies of all posts to this group.
> Chuck
>
>
PLEASE IGNORE
This is a mailing list test. For some strange reason I seem to be
getting two copies of all posts to this group.
Chuck
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today'
Okay, when your ready, I have a x64 AMD quad core running FC17 with all
the latest updates. I am wiling to give any libusbx packages a try
before you release them into the wild.
Chuck
On 06/03/2012 09:51 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/03/2012 01:12 PM, Chuck C
libusbx doesn't appear to have made it into the available packages for
Fedora 17. All I find is libusb 1.0.9.rc1 which is very out of date at
this time.
Chuck
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event w
Great finally fixes and updates!
The libusbx.org main page has a busted link. Try clicking the "samples"
link. I get a 404.
Chuck
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Te
27 matches
Mail list logo
