On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> I have now pushed the misc fixes to AUTHORS, NEWS and TODO previously
> mentioned, as well as a small fix to ensure the new fxload sample will
> be included in the Windows binary snaphot for 1.0.13.
The updated AUTHORS, NEWS and TODO look fine
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 17:39:01 +0100, Pete Batard said:
>RC2 it is then... Please see:
>https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusbx/files/releases/1.0.13/source/
It builds successfully on OS X 10.7 with clang ToT. I'm afraid I don't have
time to run it though. :(
Cheers,
--
__
On 2012.09.19 16:19, David Grant wrote:
> I've tested mass storage and isochronous with our product in Linux and
> it works great. I hope to quickly test Windows tomorrow with libusbK I hope.
Thanks.
I have now pushed the misc fixes to AUTHORS, NEWS and TODO previously
mentioned, as well as a sm
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> RC2 it is then... Please see:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusbx/files/releases/1.0.13/source/
> API doc has been updated too.
>
>
I've tested mass storage and isochronous with our product in Linux and it
works great. I hope to quickly
On 2012.09.18 01:08, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Maybe some important patches (say WinCE backend or the
> previous OpenBSD backend) should count even if the patch count
> is only 1.
That's actually what I did for BSD in 1.0.9:
https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/commit/f98eaca0985364be00fcfde3fd388407509
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.09.17 06:22, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> BTW, probably we should remove Peter Stuge from the contributor list
>> and add to the copyright holder list in the AUTHORS file to be align
>> with the libusb project.
>
> Sure, I don't mind, though
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.09.17 08:23, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> I can see from the codes that you add the support of libusb_reset_device()
>> if using libusb0.sys/libusbk.sys, the other seems to be the support
>> of set_configuration() which should only be support
On 2012.09.17 06:22, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> BTW, probably we should remove Peter Stuge from the contributor list
> and add to the copyright holder list in the AUTHORS file to be align
> with the libusb project.
Sure, I don't mind, though his presence on the copyright list in AUTHORS
happened post
On 2012.09.17 08:23, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I can see from the codes that you add the support of libusb_reset_device()
> if using libusb0.sys/libusbk.sys, the other seems to be the support
> of set_configuration() which should only be supported by libusb0.sys.
It's not supported in K then? If so, t
On 2012.09.17 06:22, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> As for the "TODO" file, are the list still be valid? Probably we should
> just mentioning that users should refer to the libusbx roadmap.
Damn we have a TODO? We did point to the git log URL in the Changelog,
so logically pointing to the roadmap URL in t
On 2012.09.17 06:12, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> For the NEWS file, I have two comments about the following
> statement.
>
> * Add libusb0 (libusb-win32) and libusbK driver support on Windows.
>Note that isochronous transfers are not supported yet for these
>drivers, and that using the libusb-win
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
>> RC2 it is then... Please see:
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusbx/files/releases/1.0.13/source/
>> API doc has been updated too.
>
> Thanks, now there are no more issues with Cyg
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
>> RC2 it is then... Please see:
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusbx/files/releases/1.0.13/source/
>> API doc has been updated too.
>
> Thanks, now there are no more issues with Cyg
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
>> RC2 it is then... Please see:
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusbx/files/releases/1.0.13/source/
>> API doc has been updated too.
>
> Thanks, now there are no more issues with Cyg
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> RC2 it is then... Please see:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusbx/files/releases/1.0.13/source/
> API doc has been updated too.
Thanks, now there are no more issues with Cygwin/MinGW build.
I will carry out more tests later.
The updat
On 2012.09.16 19:06, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> The default value is NO (and is used by libusbx). That is that Doxygen
> will NOT warn about the _abscence_ of documentation.
Well in that case, I'd rather not have doxygen complain about a call
that I chose not to document for one reason or another
2012/9/16 Pete Batard :
> First, thanks go to Ludovic for the help on doxygen. Much appreciated. I
> picked all of your suggestions, except for WARN_NO_PARAMDOC, as I think
> I'd still prefer to get a warning about parameters we forget to document.
# This WARN_NO_PARAMDOC option can be abled to ge
RC2 it is then... Please see:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusbx/files/releases/1.0.13/source/
API doc has been updated too.
First, thanks go to Ludovic for the help on doxygen. Much appreciated. I
picked all of your suggestions, except for WARN_NO_PARAMDOC, as I think
I'd still prefer to
18 matches
Mail list logo
