2013/6/27 Tim Roberts :
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>> You're right, and I'm sorry. I guess I'm to much of a rero person sometimes.
>>
>> Although win32 is far from my specialty I think the attach patch should fix
>> it. Any chance you could give it a try?
>
> This is micro-optimization, of course, but
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/commit/7b893cc7cee185c0bf771166ca61a05b32800556
> should now fix the cywgin issue, as well as sort our gettimeofday()
> usage for all the Windows compilers. It also includes the missing "%s"
> reported earlier
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
>> Once more, given the amount of changes that have been pushed since RC1,
>> I would strongly suggest that we declare RC2 and push the 1.0.16
>> milestone (due tomorrow [1]) by one week (wh
Hi,
After I tried including libusb.h via an additional local header, I've
stumpled upon a build failure (this is for libusbx HEAD but the same
can be seen with plain libusb):
In file included from libusb_dummy.h:2:0,
from libusb1_common.h:25,
from libusb1_common.
On 2013.06.30 08:58, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2013/6/27 Tim Roberts :
>> This is micro-optimization, of course, but it would be more efficient to
>> do this instead:
>> fputs(str, stderr);
>
> I also agree. Maybe Pete missed your email.
Oops, my bad. Apologies to Tim for missing his mail, an
