Re: [Libva] [PATCH 2/2] batch: fix MI_FLUSH_DW for Broadwell.

2014-05-14 Thread Zhao, Yakui
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 01:47 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: The MI_FLUSH_DW command contains 5 dwords on Broadwell, i.e. one extra dword for the high order bits of the Address field. Thanks for your patch. What is wrong if this is applied? The 4 dwords are still ok to Broadwell. And the

Re: [Libva] [PATCH 2/2] batch: fix MI_FLUSH_DW for Broadwell.

2014-05-14 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
Hi, 2014-05-14 10:10 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 01:47 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: The MI_FLUSH_DW command contains 5 dwords on Broadwell, i.e. one extra dword for the high order bits of the Address field. Thanks for your patch. What is wrong if

Re: [Libva] [PATCH 2/2] batch: fix MI_FLUSH_DW for Broadwell.

2014-05-14 Thread Zhao, Yakui
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 10:27 +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: Hi, 2014-05-14 10:10 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 01:47 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: The MI_FLUSH_DW command contains 5 dwords on Broadwell, i.e. one extra dword for the high order bits