I would like to make a new release mid or end of next week, considering
the number of fixes accumulated in CVS compared to 0.6.1, I guess 0.6.2
makes sense.
I think we should look at integrating the new SCSI pool patch, hopefully
there is no big issues.
If there are mails or patchs which are
2009/3/27 Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com
I would like to make a new release mid or end of next week, considering
the number of fixes accumulated in CVS compared to 0.6.1, I guess 0.6.2
makes sense.
I think we should look at integrating the new SCSI pool patch, hopefully
there is no big
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:42:59PM -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 19:59 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
When 'virNetwork' talks about defined vs active interfaces
there are a few things to be aware of:
- There is a concept of a persistent network. This is a
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 07:46:31PM -0300, Artur Baruchi wrote:
I executed the same program in other server, with 0.4.4 version, and
got the same problem. Is there any difference between those versions?
Yes definitely differences. It may also depend on the exact xen
version you are using. In
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:28:50AM +0100, Gian Mario wrote:
Hi to all,
i need to compile libvirt-3.3.0 to Centos 4.7. Searching in mailing list
I don't know how you ended up with such a need but it sounds really
really weird to me. Why not use a recent version ? And if you expect Xen
to
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:55:00PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:19:12PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:29:21PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
[...]
Having read the man page again, I'm inclined to say using st_blksize
is always wrong no
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 01:00:22PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:39:22PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This patch implements full support for memory ballooning in the QEMU
driver.
- Fix qemudBuildCommandLine() to set the initial boot time VM memory
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:42:59PM -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
Actually, UUID isn't so fun, since there's no place in the stock network
config script to store it. For initscripts, we can just stick a
NETCF_UUID or whatever variable into the interface config. On Debian, we
would have to
Hi to all,
i need to compile libvirt-3.3.0 to Centos 4.7. Searching in mailing list
i have seen a tread that help me to solve few problems. Actually i face
with a error concern glibc, when i run make in libvirt directory, I
obtain:
/usr/lib64/libgcrypt.so.11: undefined reference to
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:28:50AM +0100, Gian Mario wrote:
Hi to all,
i need to compile libvirt-3.3.0 to Centos 4.7. Searching in mailing list
i have seen a tread that help me to solve few problems. Actually i face
with a error concern glibc, when i run make in libvirt directory, I
obtain:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:35:27PM +0300, Anton Protopopov wrote:
2009/3/27 Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com
I would like to make a new release mid or end of next week, considering
the number of fixes accumulated in CVS compared to 0.6.1, I guess 0.6.2
makes sense.
I think we should
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:33:21PM +0100, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
I guess Dan did a more complete review of the code than mine. One of the
issues I had was many pieces of code licenced under the MIT Licence,
which is compatible with the LGPL, but I must admit that if you are the
authors of
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:11:23AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I would like to make a new release mid or end of next week, considering
the number of fixes accumulated in CVS compared to 0.6.1, I guess 0.6.2
makes sense.
I think we should look at integrating the new SCSI pool patch, hopefully
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 06:12:07PM +0300, Anton Protopopov wrote:
Hi all.
When libvirt creates an OpenVZ machine, it does smth like
# vzctl create $ctid --ostemplate `ostemplate`
And we can't specify an --config `config` argument. In this case vzctl
chooses
a default config file (a value
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:55:48PM -0400, David Allan wrote:
It does not attempt to add a volume if it cannot find a stable
path for a particular LU, for example, if the user specifies a
target path by-id and the LU is one path of a multipath device.
This will cause a regression in current
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:55:48PM -0400, David Allan wrote:
This version of the code scans a particular host for targets and LUs and adds
any LUs it finds as storage volumes.
-static int
-virStorageBackendISCSINewLun(virConnectPtr conn, virStoragePoolObjPtr pool,
-
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:55:48PM -0400, David Allan wrote:
This version of the code scans a particular host for targets and LUs and adds
any LUs it finds as storage volumes.
-static int
-virStorageBackendISCSINewLun(virConnectPtr conn, virStoragePoolObjPtr pool,
-
Hello Kaitlin,
+#include domain_conf.h
+/* Main driver state */
+typedef struct __phyp_driver phyp_driver_t;
+struct __phyp_driver {
+virMutex lock;
+
+virCapsPtr *caps;
+
+virDomainObjList *domains;
+
+char *configDir;
+char *autostartDir;
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The new generic 'NewLUN' method has lost this bit of retry / sleep logic.
This unfortauntely causes us to randomly loose LUNs due to fact that
udev may not yet have created the
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote:
Our release schedule has become a little too variable in timeframe and
quality in recent times. We've tended to get into a situation where we've
had some very large new features going in very late before release
To summarize (correct anything I've gotten wrong):
1) Supporting transient interfaces would be nice, but would require too
much re-implementation of ifup-type scripts in our code (and for every
platorm), so it is out of scope. danpb thinks at least being able to
query transient interfaces
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:55:48PM -0400, David Allan wrote:
It does not attempt to add a volume if it cannot find a stable
path for a particular LU, for example, if the user specifies a
target path by-id and the LU is one path of a multipath device.
This will cause
Hello Daniel,
The protocol between the console and the partition (LPAR) is not
disclosed, therefore I propose the driver to execute commands remoetly
over an SSH connection to the consoles to manage IBM LPARs.
That seems like a reasonably choice, unless the web server in the
HMC/IVM
23 matches
Mail list logo
