for stating your intent
even if it is superfluous, in case the statute book is changed?
Randy Kramer
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
wondering whether the branded binaries can be
redistributed if all signs of the branding are removed. Not sure about
that.)
Randy Kramer
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Randy Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ned Lilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 06
, the copyright notice can be
removed? In that case I think I'd want something to keep my name on it
as the original author, despite substantial modification -- maybe with a
pointer to where the product can be found without substantial
modification.
Randy Kramer
--
license-discuss archive is at http
Bruce,
Ok, presumably this will do it.
Randy Kramer
Bruce Perens wrote:
Someone please tell Russ his qmail is rejecting me.
Bruce
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
Michael Bauer wrote:
Randy Kramer wrote:
So, is the algorithm patented as well as copyrighted? If so, I think
another can of worms is about to have the top popped off.
You can license something that is patented, thus, if an algorithm is
patented, it could be licensed.
What algorithm
Patrik Wallstrom wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Randy Kramer wrote:
So, is the algorithm patented as well as copyrighted? If so, I think
another can of worms is about to have the top popped off.
You can license something that is patented, thus, if an algorithm is
patented
of C++).
Randy Kramer
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
-bin/view/Test/ForOsiApprovalOpenGroupTestSuiteLicense)
(page doesn't exist or something like that), try this link:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Wikilearn/ForOsiApprovalOpenGroupTestSuiteLicense
Randy Kramer
PS: I know I didn't explain much -- if you want to add comments, click
on a link that says
project is ready. It did take a fair amount
of work to set this up the first time, but if it proves worthwhile, some
parts of the setup could be automated and/or required of the applicant.
Randy Kramer
Peter Thoeny,
Just for your information. I think this might be considered TWiki
advocacy
of Internet Explorer.)
If you experience the problem, simply refresh your view -- sometimes
you may have to do it more than once.
Randy Kramer
Randy Kramer wrote:
I have taken the liberty of making a TWiki page (actually pages) of the
first license listed below. The intent is to provide a means
the open source definition, just in an attempt to
attract more cogent input.)
If you think that is worthwhile, let me know.
Randy Kramer
---End Message---
to do another
installation of the particular version I used (the 20010315 beta which
is suitable for production use). There is a new release, but I haven't
installed it yet. There are some major changes to do to my templates
and so forth, so I will be taking my time.
Randy Kramer
--
license
Randy Kramer wrote:
PS: Just for kicks, I looked at some pages on www.opensource.org and
counted 26 approved licenses, and see references to its (OSI's)
formation about one week after February 3, 1988.
Oops! Should be 1998--
Randy Kramer
--
license-discuss archive
on something like a sliding 12 month window basis.
In saying all this, I'm not sure how to treat or count a rejection,
because rejections may not really be final -- they may just prompt the
potential licensor to submit another round of modifications or
arguments.
Randy Kramer
PS: Just for kicks, I looked
see if I (or someone else) can help you.
regards,
Randy Kramer
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
content license somewhere. As
usual, there is some contoversy about which licenses are free, etc.
Randy Kramer
Sorry, cut and pasted the address incorrectly.
Randy Kramer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sort of claim is just plain wrong. The GPL is a license that the
owner of the copyright provides to another person. If you create a
deriviative work, then this work is covered by the GPL if and only
and if he gets no
response he unsubscribes them.
Thanks for the information!
Randy Kramer
David Johnson wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2001 19:44, Karsten M. Self wrote:
There are a few bad eggs subscribed to either this list or FSB whose
mailers bounce back to me. I'll report if I get any
David,
Did you get a message from the mailing list or a mail administrator or
something like that, telling you that the last few messages to you
bounced? If so, let's compare notes -- I get these occasionally (every
few months), yet I can't imagine why.
Randy Kramer
David Johnson wrote
Randy Kramer wrote:
The approved Open Source licenses have been approved on the basis that
we (the OSF or whatever) believe the terms of the approved licenses
achieve the objectives stated above."
After a little more thought, maybe I'd want to rephrase the preceding
more like:
The app
filed posts from
other mail lists in this file if they seemed relevant to open source
licensing issues.
Randy Kramer
PS: I will not send the zips to the list, but to you directly. ;-)
(Unless someone requests otherwise ;-)
21 matches
Mail list logo
