Fair enough :)
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:16 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
> Scala's JSON parser sits on top of some of Scala's parsing problems
> including recursive stuff that causes the parser to run out of stack when
> there are too many of certain kinds of elements.
> Even though you maintain Scala'
Scala's JSON parser sits on top of some of Scala's parsing problems
including recursive stuff that causes the parser to run out of stack when
there are too many of certain kinds of elements.
Even though you maintain Scala's JSON and can fix problems when they come
up, we also have to wait for the S
As long as we're talking about parsers for JSON, is there some problem or
something missing from the Scala library's JSON parser that keeps us from
using that in Lift?
http://www.scala-lang.org/docu/files/api/scala/util/parsing/json/JSON$object.html
I maintain that one, so if there's some issue t
Why not use Lift's parser one for the purpose of Record integration?
However the way I see it converting from a Record to JSON the result
should be a JsObj structure so that it can be used in other JS
expressions. Also converting from a Record to JsObj is pretty straight
forward at this Record st
And I forgot the link:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/106757/
--j
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jorge Ortiz wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> I wrote a Json AST and parser/serializer for unrelated reasons yesterday.
> This could be the basis of a Record <--> Json tool.
>
> --j
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009
Hey Folks,
I wrote a Json AST and parser/serializer for unrelated reasons yesterday.
This could be the basis of a Record <--> Json tool.
--j
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:11 AM, David Pollak
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Marius wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was thinking that it might be
POC == Proof of concept
On Mar 5, 11:33 pm, "Charles F. Munat" wrote:
> POC?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscrib
POC?
marius d. wrote:
> :) .. ok ... let me noodle for while on this and I'll get back with
> more details ... perhaps a POC
>
> On Mar 4, 7:11 pm, David Pollak wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Marius wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I was thinking that it might be useful to be able to obtain a
Although I'm using JPA, I'm very curious as to where you're going with
this. Most of my websites have secure administrative interfaces. Lately,
I've been playing around with Ext Js (extending YUI) for the back end,
and having a single "admin" page that modifies itself on the basis of
AJAX (or
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>
> Interesting thread. Whats going on with Record at the moment? Now 1.0
> is out, will attention shift back to making record the primary
> persistence mech in lift?
>
> (sorry for the thread hi-jack)
We'll chat about that on the call a wee
Interesting thread. Whats going on with Record at the moment? Now 1.0
is out, will attention shift back to making record the primary
persistence mech in lift?
(sorry for the thread hi-jack)
Cheers, Tim
On Mar 4, 5:20 pm, "marius d." wrote:
> :) .. ok ... let me noodle for while on this and I'l
:) .. ok ... let me noodle for while on this and I'll get back with
more details ... perhaps a POC
On Mar 4, 7:11 pm, David Pollak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Marius wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I was thinking that it might be useful to be able to obtain a JSON
> > representation of a Re
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Marius wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking that it might be useful to be able to obtain a JSON
> representation of a Record and also from a JSON construct to create a
> Record.
>
> Record defines now:
>
> def suplementalJs(ob: Box[KeyObfuscator]): List[(String, JsExp
13 matches
Mail list logo
