Re: post-GDP doc team

2008-07-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:44:51 -0500 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > > > Jonathan, if you're not > > going to work on Winds, > > > I don't mind working on both the Winds and Rhythm. Winds is short > and I don't see any obvious reason for it to grow a lot. I

Re: post-GDP doc team

2008-07-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:56:30 -0600 "Carl D. Sorensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/27/08 2:40 AM, "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You guys are now on your own. Stop sending me email. :) > > OK -- here's my first email to everybody else, even though the > question is pri

Re: [PATCH] deian package creation + git tag issue

2008-07-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Sébastien Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By the way the git repository tags release/2.11.53-1 and > release/2.11.53-2 are both the same and there are not presents in the > master branch. > Thus git-describe would find release/2.11.52-1 as most recent version.

Re: post-GDP doc team

2008-07-27 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 7/27/08 8:44 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm going on vacation from the 29th through Aug 6 and will have email > access but won't be working on anything. I'll start in on it when I get > back. > Drop me an email when you get back and you're ready to get to work on r

Re: post-GDP doc team

2008-07-27 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 7/27/08 2:40 AM, "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Trevor, Patick, Jonathan, Carl, Francisco, and Neil, > > > You guys are now on your own. Stop sending me email. :) OK -- here's my first email to everybody else, even though the question is primarily aimed at Graham. Once

Re: GDP: only 3 weeks left

2008-07-27 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/7/27 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ralph: we're still waiting for an LSR update, and then I'll make > some final changes and announce the first public draft of Repeats. > This should still be your focus, but do you want to start working > on the indices? A few months ago you offered

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

2008-07-27 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/7/27 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > \ottava produces *ottava brackets* in the output, so this perfectly > makes sense, and \ottava is shorter to type, isn't it Valentin ;-) ? I also favour \ottava. Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

2008-07-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:11:14 -0300 "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Valentin Villenave > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/7/27 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> What do you think? I'd vote for \octavation, which is also closer > >>

Re: separate git tree for docs

2008-07-27 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Graham Percival wrote: > A month or two ago, there was some discussion about changing the way git > is managed, to allow doc writers to have permission to change > Documentation/user/ but not other parts of the tree. At the time I > begged everybody to shelve the disc

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

2008-07-27 Thread John Mandereau
On 2008/07/24 13:49 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > Hello Han-Wen, > > Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is > > supposed > > to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master? > > Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other c

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

2008-07-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/7/27 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> What do you think? I'd vote for \octavation, which is also closer to the >> deprecated #(set-octavation ...). > > I'd say that \octavation is a bit long to type (t

Re: separate git tree for docs

2008-07-27 Thread John Mandereau
On 2008/07/27 00:56 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > As an idea of the requirements: I currently anticipate 6 people > (not currently listed as members of the devel team) who should > have commit ability to Documentation/user/ after GDP. 1 of those > people is also a translator, which may or may no

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

2008-07-27 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/7/27 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What do you think? I'd vote for \octavation, which is also closer to the > deprecated #(set-octavation ...). I'd say that \octavation is a bit long to type (though much shorter than #(set-octavation)). I'd vote for a very very short command such

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

2008-07-27 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 schrieb Graham Percival: > On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:32:08 +0200 > > > Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other commands are in > > > English? > > > > Probably yes, but lilypond had already an \octave function, which >

Re: GDP: only 3 weeks left

2008-07-27 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/7/27 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Valentin: > For the next two weeks, how about you shift > your focus to finished text.itely? Yes, I know, I feel terrible about NR1.8... I'm under a similar pressure as you are (except that it is about an opera instead of a thesis)... But as soon a

GDP: only 3 weeks left

2008-07-27 Thread Graham Percival
Hi, GDP contributors! There's only three weeks left in the Grand Documentation Project of LilyPond. On Aug 18, I'm going to stop handling contributors -- my thesis defense is on Aug 19, and after the defense I only have three days to complete any necessary changes, or else my graduation will be d

post-GDP doc team

2008-07-27 Thread Graham Percival
Hi Trevor, Patick, Jonathan, Carl, Francisco, and Neil, Please read this email carefully. Other -devel people can simply skim it. I'm now finished my thesis, course work, and everything I need to get done until my thesis defense on Aug 19th. However, this has caused me to feel immensely fatigu

separate git tree for docs

2008-07-27 Thread Graham Percival
A month or two ago, there was some discussion about changing the way git is managed, to allow doc writers to have permission to change Documentation/user/ but not other parts of the tree. At the time I begged everybody to shelve the discussion for a few weeks until I wasn't so busy. I'm now no l