In the pdf output of my CG patch, I noticed that the hyphens
in "@code{--rebase}" got separated from the word "rebase":
...add the -r option (short for --
rebase) to keep commits on your...
The hyphens can even be separated from each other:
...(see git stash) and do git reset -
-har
I pushed the main draft of my changes to the CG Git chapter.
I mentioned a confusing TOC-pane behavior in an earlier
email:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-01/msg00363.html
Once the changes are up, you can witness this in the
split-HTML CG by using the TOC pane to navigate t
LGTM, pushed to master.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/183159
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi again,
The attached file contains two almost identical scores (just the lenght of
them varies) without any special settings. However, the vertical layout of
both scores with identical settings is radically different:
-) The first, 6-measure score is placed on 6 (!!!) pages, with one measure pe
A few more thoughts:
- you can build just the mingw installer by doing
bin/gub mingw::lilypond-installer
- you can also give it a different git repo, and presumably a file
location(?), on the command-line, but I can't remember the
syntax.
- the "release work" chapter of the CG in git (*NO
Le jeudi 14 janvier 2010 à 08:36 +, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
> Unlike copying from the SHA1 ID and Find fields, cntl-c
> cannot be used to copy to the clipboard from this pane.
>
> In Windows you have to press enter.
>
> In gitk running under ubuntu even this does not work. The field
> to be
Le jeudi 14 janvier 2010 à 12:52 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> 3) this is a presentation issue, not a content issue. As long as it
> compiles, push it, then let other people work on the presentation.
>
> Based on your description, I gather that there's yet another bug in
> lilypond-texi2html
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
>> Umm. It would be *way*, ***way*** easier to download lilybuntu and do
>> a normal compile in there
>
> Then I probably had misunderstood the purpose of Lilybuntu -- I thought this
> was for people who did not have a real linux setup for d
Umm. It would be *way*, ***way*** easier to download lilybuntu and do
a normal compile in there
Then I probably had misunderstood the purpose of Lilybuntu -- I thought
this was for people who did not have a real linux setup for doing
lilypond development -- like, having all the prerequisites
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
>> By the way, do you have a good reason to build using GUB anyway?
>
> Because I read on the maillist that it was not possible to do a native build
> of lilypond for win32.
Umm. It would be *way*, ***way*** easier to download lilybuntu and
By the way, do you have a good reason to build using GUB anyway?
Because I read on the maillist that it was not possible to do a native
build of lilypond for win32.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Mark Polesky wrote:
> Yep. Thanks Joe!
Brilliant. There's probably plenty more that can be added -- see all
the info on the Wine wiki linked to -- but this seems to be the really
_essential_ stuff. Maybe also a link to where to get dos2unix ... ?
__
By the way, do you have a good reason to build using GUB anyway? If you
just want to build and install LilyPond on your own machine, it's by far
much easier to just build LilyPond directly.
I did actually manage to use GUB some year ago, when I wanted to try
some patches on the Windows install
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> That's the very first thing I found, but that's NOT what you were talking
> about in the first e-mail. It is LILYPOND_REPO, which is a separate
> variable.
And I said I was guessing.
> You see, I read both the head revision and 2.11.64-1,
Quoting Graham Percival :
Didn't you read the part where I said you had to read the source, and
that there was probably something wrong in the above line?
Line 17 of lilypond.make is:
LILYPOND_REPO_URL=git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
That's not hard to find, and I think it's pretty clear tha
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 03:27:59PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> I second this suggestion, except for the exclamation mark; I'd like
> something more explicit, like "[BUILD]" or "[DOCS BUILD]" or whatever
> depending on the area of the proposal. I suggest also to send such
> emails by always star
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 03:15:06PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Another thing that we could do instead of creating another list is
> writing down as a specification (even written quite informally) the
> important changes already started i.e. the i18n of Texinfo, stuff
> specific to building the w
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Boris Shingarov wrote:
>> Oh, and make sure you're using the latest GUB; IIRC there are 2 or
>> 3 different git repositories floating around. You want the one at
>> github.
>
> git://github.com/janneke/gub.git -- this one, right?
Yes.
>> I believe you'll want so
Suggestions:
1) stop sticking everything in the same thread; it makes it very hard
to keep track of what's happening.
2) I can't reproduce with some tests on programming-work.itexi based
on your description, so further debugging would be tricky for me.
3) this is a presentation issue, not a conte
Joseph Wakeling wrote Thursday, January 14, 2010 12:11 PM
Sometime soon I must get back onto the Contemporary Music docs.
That would be good! Happy to help when you're ready.
Trevor
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http:/
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Thanks Joe
>
> Mark is currently redrafting this section of the CG and it seems
> he has picked up and applied your changes in his latest patch.
That's great. Glad it was useful. :-)
Sometime soon I must get back onto the Contemporary Music docs. I'm
sorry for the absen
Unfortunately, there's a hierarchy problem with the
@subsubheading Technical details
thing that had previously escaped my notice. I'm finding
this really confusing so I'll try to be clear. And I could
be wrong on some detail... Any instance of
@unnumberedsubsubsec foo
that comes immediat
Trevor Daniels wrote Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:18 AM
John Mandereau wrote Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:44 AM
Le mercredi 13 janvier 2010 =C3=A0 09:27 +, Trevor Daniels a
=C3=A9crit=
In gitk (in either Unix or Windows) you can only
copy/paste within the fields that you can highlig
23 matches
Mail list logo
