summary for devs: we suppose that error message about too old a version
error: file too old: 2.6.0 (oldest supported: 2.7.38)
error: consider updating the input with the convert-ly script
is misleading, and consider changing it.
2011/6/12 Brent Annable brentanna...@gmail.com:
Hey Janek,
LGTM.
Btw, is it possible to download a source file from Rietveld?
I'd like to copy the regression test written by Reinhold, and i'm too
lazy to remove all the '+' at the beggining of lines manually...
Janek
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
2011/6/11 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
2.15.1 has fontforge 20110222.
= fontforge 20110222 is required for building 2.15
and
!= fontforge 20110222 included in lilydev, but it will be?
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:44:14PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2011/6/11 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
2.15.1 has fontforge 20110222.
= fontforge 20110222 is required for building 2.15
It is not required. It is optional. It will become required once
it's in lilydev.
Cheers,
-
On Jun 12, 2011, at 5:49 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/06/05 10:18:18, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:00 PM, mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4527086/diff/7002/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
Style problems corrected.
Thanks for review, Neil!
http://codereview.appspot.com/4607043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely
File Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4607043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely#newcode2801
Thanks - much clearer!
Two points:
a) It would be better to honour the value of 'gap if this
is set by the user, rather than change a specifically
requested gap value.
b) I don't understand why quanting is desired. An ambitus
doesn't align with anything. What is your reason?
2011/6/12 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:06:35PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/6/11 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Is this problem likely to be unfixed? Or is there a compelling
reason to override our normal doc policy in this specific
2011/6/13 tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com:
Thanks - much clearer!
Two points:
a) It would be better to honour the value of 'gap if this
is set by the user, rather than change a specifically
requested gap value.
My rationale is that it wouldn't make sense to set a big gap and
really want to
I've now reduced the output from make doc from over 500,000 lines to just
over 100,000 so there are some error messages I see that were not obvious
before. In the output I see:
cd ./out-www; texi2pdf -I /home/phil/lilypond-git/Documentation -I
/home/phil/lilypond-git/input/regression --quiet
- Original Message -
From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net; Lily-Devel List
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: ugly boxes
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message
Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
and the Error message repeated about 500 times. The block of these
error messages is repeated through the output. This is using
lily-ubuntu (ubuntu 10.04). It appears from the web that it's a bug
in Ubuntu, but just wondering
Janek Warchoł wrote Monday, June 13, 2011 2:51 PM
2011/6/13 tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com:
a) It would be better to honour the value of 'gap if this
is set by the user, rather than change a specifically
requested gap value.
My rationale is that it wouldn't make sense to set a big gap and
- Original Message -
From: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org
To: m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: Further build bugs
Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
and the Error message repeated about 500 times. The
ToUnicode entries are generated by texinfo.tex. Assuming that your
texinfo.tex (in the lilypond/tex) isn't garbled, it seems that your
pdftex can't digest them properly.
You have to be looking, otherwise it's a bit like a needle in a
haystack. I think it may also be Ubuntu specific - are
Yes, thanks. 'Tis done.
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4536068/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2011/6/13 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed)
An idea came to my mind - maybe we can use our *.table files in feta-flags?
Is it possible to tell our build system to compile feta-noteheads
first and feta-flags (which would contain a
Reviewers: ,
Message:
A small patch that redefines the braces:
* Increases the width of the smallest.
* Reduces the width of the largest.
* Increments more consistently between two braces (there were too many
tiny braces).
* Increases the thickness of the ends of braces.
* Sharpens a little the
I like the new shapes and thicknesses, at least in isolation. I've not
tried any tests using them in real scores.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4581060/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
I have send the patch set to Janek for upload.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4490045/diff/20001/lily/tie-engraver.cc
File lily/tie-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4490045/diff/20001/lily/tie-engraver.cc#newcode163
lily/tie-engraver.cc:163: /*
On 2011/06/01 21:21:25, Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/4490045/diff/20001/lily/tie-engraver.cc
File lily/tie-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4490045/diff/20001/lily/tie-engraver.cc#newcode163
lily/tie-engraver.cc:163: /*
On 2011/06/13 22:44:37, karin.hoethker wrote:
On 2011/06/01 21:21:25, Neil
On 11-06-13 01:17 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed) - i have no idea
why... Maybe i forgot to make clean when i tested it before, but i'm
almost sure i didn't. Still, this looks like the only possible
explanation.
Mike tested it too and he got flags as
22 matches
Mail list logo
