Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
>
> I will be running fixcc.py on the git repo
Tabs-to-spaces and trailing-spaces-strip are now done by the Python script, so
you don't need to do these steps by hand.
> Apologies for the inconvenience; this should be a one-time painful
> transition
New patch set uploaded (adding a regtest).
2011/8/1 Wols Lists :
Regression test attached. I've looked at the other regression tests
and
tried to make it similar.
Great!
http://codereview.appspot.com/4800051/diff/14003/input/regression/chord-capo.ly
File input/regression/chord-capo.ly (rig
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:29:33PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> No such file: file.itexi
> Search path: .:./out-www:.
Extremely normal; happens all the time. :(
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https:/
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> music_list in parser.yy temporarily maintains an awkward
> half-self-referential data structure in order to have "fast append". It
> makes more sense in my opinion to use prepend and reverse afterwards.
> "Fast append" in theory may show min
Ouch...
The problem with '&' is that it fails on lyrics:
this works:
\new Lyrics \lyricmode { a&s; }
but this doesn't:
\new Lyrics \lyricmode { &s; }
There is the same kind of issues with almost every easy-to-type special
character:
@ % $ # \ / < > ^ ~ + = * ; ( ) [ ] { }
This is the exact lis
On 7/31/11 11:41 AM, "bordage.bertr...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> I updated the patch.
>
> There's now a list of special characters and a \replace command for
> markups.
>
> The escape character is now '§'. It's the only one that works great
> with lyrics. And it isn't used elsewhere in LilyPond'
On 7/31/11 4:17 PM, "Wols Lists" wrote:
> On 31/07/11 22:00, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> 2011/7/31 Wols Lists :
>>>
>>> Assuming that it's okay and is applied, I've redone my docu patch.
>>
>> Uploaded to Rietveld. I see one trailing whitespace (after "By
>> default the chords are"), also there sh
On 31/07/11 22:00, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/7/31 Wols Lists :
>>
>> Assuming that it's okay and is applied, I've redone my docu patch.
>
> Uploaded to Rietveld. I see one trailing whitespace (after "By
> default the chords are"), also there should be two spaces after a
> period which ends sent
On 2011/07/31 20:10:30, J_lowe wrote:
Passes Make and there is a reg test difference which looks ok. I
created a
tracker
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1794
so people can see this but also because this has been going on for a
while and
the tracker will at least keep
Scott,
the patch below is needed to avoid a non-integer argument to hsbw in
the definition of `.notdef'. LilyPond produces such fonts
(e.g. feta-braces-a), causing the following two warnings:
t1asm: unknown charstring command `91.60803'
fontforge: Stack underflow on hsbw in .notdef
[Note
W dniu 31 lipca 2011 22:07 użytkownik James Lowe
napisał:
> From: Jan Warchoł [lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com]
>> And Graham watches everything smoking a cigar :)
>
> No...stroking a white fluffy cat you mean?
I didn't know Winston had a cat!
Janek
__
W dniu 31 lipca 2011 22:39 użytkownik James Lowe
napisał:
> Download Acrobat Reader from Adobe
> They have a Linux Version you can install the .deb file
I had it installed already (i don't remember whether i used sudo
apt-get or a .deb file, but i think it doesn't matter), and it doesn't
work - s
2011/7/31 Wols Lists :
>
> Assuming that it's okay and is applied, I've redone my docu patch.
Uploaded to Rietveld. I see one trailing whitespace (after "By
default the chords are"), also there should be two spaces after a
period which ends sentence.
> The snippet prints a four-bar phrase with j
hello,
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Janek
Warchoł [lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com]
Sent: 31 July 2011 21:09
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: opening
Passes Make and there is a reg test difference which looks ok. I created
a tracker
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1794
so people can see this but also because this has been going on for a
while and the tracker will at least keep this on people's radars.
http://codereview.app
Hi,
my Lilydev cannot open eps files which are produced by running
regression tests. I have installed everything that shows when i
search for "eps viewer" in Software Center, but it didn't help. I
tried gv, but it crashed on them. Suggestions?
cheers,
Janek
___
Hello
From: lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com [lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com] on
behalf of Jan Warchoł [lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com]
Sent: 31 July 2011 07:10
To: James Lowe
Cc: Graham Percival; Devel
Subject: Re: PATCH: Countdown delayed by Monster
Hello,
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of
Jean-Charles Malahieude [lily...@orange.fr]
Sent: 31 July 2011 18:41
To: Lily Bugs; lilypond-devel
Subject: Lilynet do
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes Make and reg tests
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792#c1
http://codereview.appspot.com/4293054/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Phil
Holmes [m...@philholmes.net]
Sent: 31 July 2011 17:17
To: Reinhold Kainhofer; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re:
Mike,
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of
m...@apollinemike.com [m...@apollinemike.com]
Sent: 31 July 2011 18:30
To: lilypond-devel (lilypond-devel@gnu.org)
Subj
Phil,
From: Phil Holmes [m...@philholmes.net]
Sent: 31 July 2011 10:14
To: James Lowe; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Make doc failing
- Original Message -
From: "James Lowe"
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:40 AM
Subject: Make doc failing
I updated the patch.
There's now a list of special characters and a \replace command for
markups.
The escape character is now '§'. It's the only one that works great
with lyrics. And it isn't used elsewhere in LilyPond's syntax.
The syntax for using the list of special characters
#(include-sp
Hi all!
Is there any problem with www.lilynet.net ?
I'm landing at "Test Page for the Apache HTTP Server on Fedora"
telling me:
This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP server
after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it means that
the web server instal
On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> tuplet-rest.ly is different and looks like
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1720 has been fixed.
> Except it's down as patch needs work. Explanation, please?
1720 is not really fixed - it is just that LilyPond makes smarter
Hey all,
I'll be out of town until Monday(ish) and my internet connection will be spotty
at best. Sorry in advance for any lag in responding to the list.
In case anyone in the UK wants to attend a concert of my LilyPonderful piece
norman (age 1), it'll be playing in Saint Paul's Hall in Hudders
On 2011/07/31 10:46:54, MikeSol wrote:
Hey all,
These incorporate several comments from Neil regarding automatic
footnotes.
Sorry for having missed them before, Neil!
Cheers,
MS
Forgot to mention that this passes regtests.
Cheers,
MS
http://codereview.appspot.com/4798063/
___
Wols Lists writes:
> On 31/07/11 17:47, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Windows 2000 (not NT-based IIRC) does not usefully employ memory
>> protection IIRC, so likely Cygwin does not add all too much on top.
>
> Windows 2000 most definitely IS NT-based. You're thinking of Windows ME,
> which is the last
On 31/07/11 17:47, David Kastrup wrote:
> Windows 2000 (not NT-based IIRC) does not usefully employ memory
> protection IIRC, so likely Cygwin does not add all too much on top.
Windows 2000 most definitely IS NT-based. You're thinking of Windows ME,
which is the last of the DOS7/Win9x line.
Cheer
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:26:11AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Modern operating systems don't give your code any leftovers from a
>> previous run. That would be a security violation.
>
> I'm certain that I've seen an uninitialized variable being
> 123456789 in some c
On 31/07/11 11:35, lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com wrote:
> New patch uploaded. Passes regtests made from scratch.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4800051/
>
Assuming that it's okay and is applied, I've redone my docu patch. The
snippet prints a four-bar phrase with just the standard chord (t
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:26:11AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Modern operating systems don't give your code any leftovers from a
> previous run. That would be a security violation.
I'm certain that I've seen an uninitialized variable being
123456789 in some cases, and 0 in others. I sincerly
Hi Phil,
I don't know if this is in relation with your work on
extract_texi_filenames.py and don't remember if it was spitted before.
Many of the calls to this script, especially each time it will process
an out-www/web.texi I get something weird with "searchpath":
No such file: file.itexi
- Original Message -
From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 3)
Am Sunday, 31. July 2011, 01:34:16 schrieb Graham Percival:
** Proposal details
When you run make or make doc,
* All output will be
>> When you run make or make doc,
>>
>> * All output will be saved to various log files, with the
>> exception of output directly from make(1).
>> * By default, no other output will be displayed on the
>> console, with one exception: if a build fails, we might
>> display
Don't think this is a problem, but it is a bit interesting. I've been
trying to run my pixel comparator to compare 15.7 to 15.5 and getting a
difference in the bar lines of every image - presumably owing to the work to
stop the PDF artefacts. Looking carefully at the bar lines, you can see
th
Am Sunday, 31. July 2011, 01:34:16 schrieb Graham Percival:
> ** Proposal details
>
> When you run make or make doc,
>
> * All output will be saved to various log files, with the
> exception of output directly from make(1).
> * By default, no other output will be displayed on the
>
Hi Pál (besides, are you Pál Benkő the chess master?)
Thanks for this nice review.
1. about the very existence of usable-duration-logs -
ok, it's generic, but who uses this genericity?
is it not always (0 -1 -2 -3)?
is it not always a range with lower end -3?
is it not always a
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Sunday, 31. July 2011, 01:56:02 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>> > The principles:
>> >
>> > \tweak comes immediately before the object to be modified.
>>
>> Except when not.
>>
>> \tweak ... c
>>
>> does not work,
>
> It works on the whole c
Am Sunday, 31. July 2011, 07:45:20 schrieb Graham Percival:
> I haven't seen any interest in
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1732
> This is unfortunate, since it means that we can't have a release
> candidate on Aug 01.
Without a reproducible test case, it's simply not possi
Am Sunday, 31. July 2011, 01:56:02 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
> > The principles:
> >
> > \tweak comes immediately before the object to be modified.
>
> Except when not.
>
> \tweak ... c
>
> does not work,
It works on the whole chord, unfortunately (similar to how \harmoni
Comparing with 2.14.0.
Lots of changes because of the new brace shape. Some minor staff
positioning changes. Beams in different places on 2 tests: see the
attached.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
<><>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.o
Am Sunday, 31. July 2011, 01:48:16 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> On 7/30/11 4:37 PM, "Jan Warchoł" wrote:
> > Hmm, i'd say that \once \override could work like tweak. Currently
> > \once \override affects all objects created at the same moment in
> > given context, but i think it wouldn't be of much i
On 2011/07/30 22:59:11, Reinhold wrote:
I think that you forgot to rebase your branch to origin/master before
uploading
that patch. Your version does not have some of the latest patches in
the git
tree, so it appears that you are reverting some of those patches.
http://codereview.appspot.c
On So., 31. Jul. 2011 11:52:47 CEST, Phil Holmes wrote:
> dynamics-alignment-breaker.ly: the hairpin has moved above the stave
Yes, expected, issue was fixed.
> display-lily-tests.log:
>
> \revert Voice . TextScript #'direction
> \revert Voice . Tie #'direction
> + \revert V
2011/7/31 David Kastrup :
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Graham Percival writes:
>>>
>>> > I haven't seen any interest in
>>> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
>>>
>>> My take on this (if nobody is going
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Xavier Scheuer"
Cc: "lilypond-devel" ; "bug-lilypond"
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Full measure rest should take more horizontal space
Wow, i'm CCed! Why?
2011/7/31 Xavier Scheuer :
Hello,
In my everyday use o
Wow, i'm CCed! Why?
2011/7/31 Xavier Scheuer :
> Hello,
>
> In my everyday use of LilyPond I am often annoyed by the fact that
> —especially in "tighter situations"— full measure rests take very
> little horizontal space, hence their measure width are much more
> *compressed* than neighbouring mea
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hey all,
These incorporate several comments from Neil regarding automatic
footnotes. Sorry for having missed them before, Neil!
Cheers,
MS
Description:
Incorporates suggestions from Neil into footnotes.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4798063/
Affec
New patch uploaded. Passes regtests made from scratch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4800051/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
tuplet-rest.ly is different and looks like
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1720 has been fixed.
Except it's down as patch needs work. Explanation, please?
dynamics-alignment-breaker.ly: the hairpin has moved above the stave
display-lily-tests.log:
\revert Voice . TextScr
Hello,
In my everyday use of LilyPond I am often annoyed by the fact that
—especially in "tighter situations"— full measure rests take very
little horizontal space, hence their measure width are much more
*compressed* than neighbouring measures.
This results in IMHO poor output.
I do not know wha
hi Bertrand,
the patch is correct, AFAICS; see some minor improvements below.
minor concerns (which shouldn't delay acception):
1. about the very existence of usable-duration-logs -
ok, it's generic, but who uses this genericity?
is it not always (0 -1 -2 -3)?
is it not always a range
- Original Message -
From: "James Lowe"
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:40 AM
Subject: Make doc failing
Hello,
I'm not able to make doc. The last time it worked was around wed last week
(I don't make doc that often).
[snip]
FYI I ran a completely new build last night UK time
W dniu 31 lipca 2011 01:23 użytkownik James Lowe
napisał:
> Then what would be the purpose of \once \override; or is that your point?
Yeah, making \once \override work like \tweak is my point. But i'm
not sure about it, it's just an idea for GLISS.
W dniu 31 lipca 2011 01:48 użytkownik Carl So
LGTM.
2011/7/31 Graham Percival :
> We have somebody willing to work on this stuff. He's twiddling
> his thumbs until we get the basic guidelines down. Of course
> there will be technical implementation problems to work out later,
> but I'm really hoping that he can start work; it's been a month
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:04:59AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> But this bug has been reported as occuring non-deterministically even in
>> successive runs on the same machine, and there are rather few things
>> that can introduce such stochastic behavior (another poss
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:04:59AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> But this bug has been reported as occuring non-deterministically even in
> successive runs on the same machine, and there are rather few things
> that can introduce such stochastic behavior (another possibility would
> be timer-trigge
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:42 AM
Graham Percival writes:
I haven't seen any interest in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few
hours) is
to revert the flawed fix.
+1
The original bug fi
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > I haven't seen any interest in
>> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
>>
>> My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours)
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > I haven't seen any interest in
>> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
>>
>> My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours)
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > I haven't seen any interest in
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
>
> My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours) is
> to revert the flawed fix.
I
Graham Percival writes:
> I haven't seen any interest in
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours) is
to revert the flawed fix.
Reason: we get rid of a critical issue.
The original bug fixer does not appear
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, July 31, 2011 12:34 AM
Are there any problems with those guidelines?
Not from me. Let's give them a try.
Trevor
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3798 - Release Date: 07/30/11
65 matches
Mail list logo
