On 2012/05/11 08:11:18, dak wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com mailto:m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On 11 mai 2012, at 09:09, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6201068/diff/1/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc
File lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc (right):
On 17 mai 2012, at 09:21, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-countdown fixed2_15_39
Comment #20 on issue 2527 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Finger-flag collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2527
Comment 10 showed the
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:44:20AM +0100, James wrote:
On 16 May 2012, at 19:26, Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to report that GUB is working on a VM here:
$ git clone git://github.com/gperciva/gub.git cd gub
$ make bootstrap
$ bin/gub lilypond-installer
$ sh
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:53:32AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Yes. I followed this documentation:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor-big-page#lilydev
http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/LilyDev/ubuntu-LilyDev-remix-2.6.iso
Great! Could I convince you to send a merge
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:53:32AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Yes. I followed this documentation:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor-big-page#lilydev
- Original Message -
From: Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com
To: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Cc: Lilypond Dev lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: Successful GUB make bootstrap and bin/gub lilypond-installer
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at
http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/diff/4023/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/diff/4023/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1077
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1077:
I'm not comfortable with
Reviewers: J_lowe,
http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/diff/4023/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/diff/4023/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1077
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1077:
On
I think it's much clearer than it was, which is a definite improvement.
I also think some simple rearranging could make it even more accessible
for the user.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/diff/4023/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File
On 2012/05/17 18:57:11, Carl wrote:
I think it's much clearer than it was, which is a definite
improvement.
I also think some simple rearranging could make it even more
accessible for the
user.
No argument here. The current distinction is rather artificial since
automatic/manual is just
On 2012/05/17 19:28:49, dak wrote:
I think that I pretty much got the possibilities covered in the
current text. I
still have to hunt down warnings/programming errors, so I would focus
on the
code and be perfectly glad if somebody else is willing to carry the
documentation from here.
If
On 2012/05/17 21:36:53, Carl wrote:
On 2012/05/17 19:28:49, dak wrote:
I think that I pretty much got the possibilities covered in the
current text.
I
still have to hunt down warnings/programming errors, so I would
focus on the
code and be perfectly glad if somebody else is willing to
I've reviewed only the English input.itely file. This seems so much
clearer now. I like having the full syntax presented first. My
comments are suggestions to marginally improve the clarity further.
Trevor
http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/diff/2045/Documentation/notation/input.itely
Carl,
Go for it.
Just bear in mind that when someone like (Father Gilbert for instance)
is confronted with:
Like with @code{\tweak}, if your @code{\footnote} is applied to a
post-event or articulation, it will itself have to be preceded with
@code{-} to make the parser attach the result to the
On 2012/05/17 22:28:19, J_lowe wrote:
Carl,
Go for it.
Just bear in mind that when someone like (Father Gilbert for instance)
is
confronted with:
Like with @code{\tweak}, if your @code{\footnote} is applied to a
post-event or
articulation, it will itself have to be preceded with
For 20:00 MDT Sunday May 20
Critical:
Issue 2536
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2536: Patch: Make
\footnote work via \tweak - R 6195098
http://codereview.appspot.com/6195098/
Enhancement:
Issue 2533
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2533: Patch:
Am 16.05.2012 05:23, schrieb Colin Campbell:
[...]
Issue 2497 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2497:
restrainOpenStrings: please fix snippet in
Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely - R 6206072
http://codereview.appspot.com/6206072/
[...]
Issue 1320
17 matches
Mail list logo
