Due to this marvellous video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=345o3Wu95Qo
I have learned that short slurs and ties aren't engraved manually;
instead, there are ready-to-use stamps. In other words, since the
number of such stamps is limited, tie and slur shapes become discrete
if their length is
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Due to this marvellous video
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=345o3Wu95Qo
>
> I have learned that short slurs and ties aren't engraved manually;
> instead, there are ready-to-use stamps. In other words, since the
> number of such stamp
>> People can argue that this is an unnecessary limitation; lilypond
>> can do a `better' job. However, I'm not sure whether we should do
>> better...
>
> We should, definitely!
> There are bad tie and slur shapes in Lily, but this is not due to
> not having discrete lengths.
Umm, yes. I've me
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>> People can argue that this is an unnecessary limitation; lilypond
>>> can do a `better' job. However, I'm not sure whether we should do
>>> better...
>>
>> We should, definitely!
>> There are bad tie and slur shapes in Lily, but this is not due to
>> not having discre
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> We should, definitely!
>> There are bad tie and slur shapes in Lily, but this is not due to
>> not having discrete lengths.
>
> Umm, yes. I've meant: Should lilypond do a `better' job than the
> engravers working with those stamps?
I u
>> Frankly, I don't see the point in simulating well-craftedness by
>> artificially introducing minor deficiencies associated with some of
>> the better work.
>
> @Werner: i could live with an *option* doing this, but i doubt that
> people are interested in writing it. And i think we have much,
>
Hi David,
i'm writing just to let you know that the function changing arpeggio length:
offsetArpeggioPositions =
#(define-music-function (parser location offsets) (pair?)
#{
\override Arpeggio #'positions = #(lambda (grob)
(let* ((func (assoc-get 'positions (cdr
(ly:grob-basic-p
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>> Frankly, I don't see the point in simulating well-craftedness by
>>> artificially introducing minor deficiencies associated with some of
>>> the better work.
>>
>> @Werner: i could live with an *option* doing this, but i doubt that
>> people are interested in writing it
On 22 mai 2012, at 22:15, David Nalesnik wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:10 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
> wrote:
> On 22 mai 2012, at 21:01, David Nalesnik wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:20 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
>> wrote:
>> Hey David,
>>
>> You've been doing
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> I wish it was possible to add context to grob name in a more
>> LilyPondish way (i.e. with a dot)
>
> It is conceivable as a parser extension,
That's good news!
> like 3/4 is nowadays generally read as '(3 . 4).
2012/5/23 Janek Warchoł :
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Janek Warchoł writes:
>>
>>> I wish it was possible to add context to grob name in a more
>>> LilyPondish way (i.e. with a dot)
>>
>> It is conceivable as a parser extension,
>
> That's good news!
>
>> like 3/4 i
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>>> Frankly, I don't see the point in simulating well-craftedness by
>>> artificially introducing minor deficiencies associated with some of
>>> the better work.
>>
>> @Werner: i could live with an *option* doing this, but i doubt that
>> p
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> I tried it similar to `overrideProperty' from `music-functions-init.ly'
> But I didn't manage to get rid of the ""-signs, when specifying the
> coctext. Is this possible?
>
> \version "2.15.38"
>
> offsetPositions =
> #(define-music-function
Hi Mike,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:47 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
>
> [ ... ] Your patch is a post-processing corrective for when this fails.
> However, the goal of LilyPond is twofold:
>
> 1) Provide users with the ability to tweak LilyPond's output when for some
> reason the automation m
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:16 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> I find that the automation settings generally produce a good-looking result,
> and looking through some of my scores I find that I usually let slurs, ties,
> etc. alone, with an occasional override of 'positions. For me this is
> testament
Hi all,
Speaking of ugly slurs and slur controls… ;)
Is there any easy way to get back the Slur #'attachment property we used to
have?
Cheers,
Kieren.
On 2012-May-23, at 16:51, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:16 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>> I find that the automation setti
16 matches
Mail list logo
