Re: SubdivideBeam gives undesired result when beaming over more than a quarter note

2015-11-19 Thread James
Urs, run git-cl config again (make sure you have recently pulled as there were some fixes). The Allura Server URL is https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/] You then need to set up a token in your Allura Login 'account settings' (you have a login to that site right?), select the Oauth

PATCHES: Countdown for November 22nd 2015

2015-11-19 Thread James
Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on November 22nd PUSH: 4659 Tweak Rest.staff-position fails with beam - David Kastrup https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4659/ http://codereview.appspot.com/275320043/ 4089 NR: Add bet

Re: SubdivideBeam gives undesired result when beaming over more than a quarter note

2015-11-19 Thread Urs Liska
Hi James, thanks for the explanations. No, I don't know about an Allura account. Or were they automatically copied over from the Google tracker, the Rietveld tool or the LilyPond Git repository? Thanks Urs Am 19.11.2015 um 15:06 schrieb James: > Urs, > > run git-cl config again (make sure you h

Re: SubdivideBeam gives undesired result when beaming over more than a quarter note

2015-11-19 Thread James
Urs On 19/11/15 14:09, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi James, > > thanks for the explanations. > > No, I don't know about an Allura account. Or were they automatically > copied over from the Google tracker, the Rietveld tool or the LilyPond > Git repository? > > Thanks > Urs Send an email to Trevor or Phil

Re: PATCHES: Countdown for November 22nd 2015

2015-11-19 Thread David Kastrup
James writes: > Hello, > Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on > November 22nd > > > > PUSH: > > 4659 Tweak Rest.staff-position fails with beam - David Kastrup [...] > 4659 Doc: CG - updates to lily-git section - James Lowe Cough cough. For

Re: Allura account

2015-11-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
Hi Urs This isn't documented as the expectation was that this was a brief temporary home for the issues DB while a new permanent home at Savannah was brought into service. But it seems that has stalled, so maybe we ought to rethink this and document the present position. Anyway, all you need

Re: Allura account

2015-11-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
Oh, and you also need to pull the latest version of git-cl. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" To: "Urs Liska" Cc: "Lily-Devel List" Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 3:18 PM Subject: Re: Allura account > Hi Urs > > This isn't documented as the expectation was that

Re: Allura account

2015-11-19 Thread Urs Liska
Did that already. Currently I'm waiting for my confirmation email. Seems sourceforge doesn't properly re-send that message to overcome the greylisting of my mail server ... Am 19.11.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Oh, and you also need to pull the latest version of git-cl. That was the f

Re: Implement make-bow-stencil, make-tie-stencil for use in markup-commands undertie and overtie (issue 270640043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2015-11-19 Thread tdanielsmusic
LGTM, apart from an oversight, although this is based on just eye-balling. https://codereview.appspot.com/270640043/diff/11/scm/define-markup-commands.scm File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/270640043/diff/11/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#newcod

Re: PATCHES: Countdown for November 22nd 2015

2015-11-19 Thread James Lowe
On 19/11/15 14:45, David Kastrup wrote: > James writes: > >> Hello, >> Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on >> November 22nd >> >> >> >> PUSH: >> >> 4659 Tweak Rest.staff-position fails with beam - David Kastrup > [...] >> 4659 Doc: CG - upda

Re: Implement make-bow-stencil, make-tie-stencil for use in markup-commands undertie and overtie (issue 270640043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2015-11-19 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2015/11/18 23:01:20, thomasmorley651 wrote: On 2015/11/16 15:57:49, dak wrote: > If we are sure we'll never need to change the direction based on the > markup direction (like, say, over/under actual note glyphs?), I'd just implement > commands undertie/overtie that call some internal func

Re: Implement make-bow-stencil, make-tie-stencil for use in markup-commands undertie and overtie (issue 270640043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2015-11-19 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2015/11/19 21:29:41, thomasmorley651 wrote: On 2015/11/18 23:01:20, thomasmorley651 wrote: > On 2015/11/16 15:57:49, dak wrote: > > If we are sure we'll never need to change the direction based on the > > markup direction (like, say, over/under actual note glyphs?), I'd just > implement

Re: SubdivideBeam gives undesired result when beaming over more than a quarter note

2015-11-19 Thread Urs Liska
Thanks. Obviously it worked now and I have successfully created https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4664/ and https://codereview.appspot.com/278060043 However, I have a question: Where are the CLI messages defined that are used in the git-cl process? This is still talking about Google

Re: Ensure one beam is left in subdivided beams (issue 278060043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2015-11-19 Thread tdanielsmusic
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/278060043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: SubdivideBeam gives undesired result when beaming over more thana quarter note

2015-11-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
Urs Liska wrote Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:20 PM > However, I have a question: Where are the CLI messages defined that are > used in the git-cl process? This is still talking about Google issue > tracker items. Good point. That was why I thought you might not have updated git-cl. Copying t

Re: SubdivideBeam gives undesired result when beaming over more thana quarter note

2015-11-19 Thread Urs Liska
Am 20.11.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Urs Liska wrote Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:20 PM > >> However, I have a question: Where are the CLI messages defined that are >> used in the git-cl process? This is still talking about Google issue >> tracker items. > Good point. That was why