AFAICT after a few hours of fiddling this issue is fixed, let's wait for
release to verify it (and not hopefully reopen it :-P). Let me know how
is current master. I've built and have checked both online and offline
targets, both split and big-page manuals, both docs in English and
Italian (so I'
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:21:09AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 23.45 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> > If the patch breaks offline docs, then something is /really/
> > messed up. Did my 819365f311a832c5cc57f086016069efdbee91fa break
> > the offline docs?
>
>
Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 23.45 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> Eh? The patch only does stuff for the online target. That's what
> line 349 is supposed to do:
> if target == 'online':
Indeed, I'm really puzzled. I'm sure I looked at offline docs with your
second patch, but
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:40:05PM +, john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2010/10/17 21:14:11, Graham Percival wrote:
> >Along the way, I've found that firefox is profoundly unhappy with
> "..//..".
> >That may have prompted me to add the extra ../ to translations
> initially. Or
> >maybe the
On 2010/10/17 21:14:11, Graham Percival wrote:
Here's another version. Note that the "extra depth" thing is now
added to the
*non*-translated version.
I have no clue why. I've spent 3 hours bashing against the build
process, and
that's enough for me.
CG 5.3 Debugging website and docs
Here's another version. Note that the "extra depth" thing is now added
to the *non*-translated version.
I have no clue why. I've spent 3 hours bashing against the build
process, and that's enough for me.
CG 5.3 Debugging website and docs locally
has what I know about trying to solve this stuf
Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 20.38 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> The extra "../" is present in the docs, in the output of
> postprocess.html, if no attempt is made to rewrite the "return to doc
> index". I don't know if these exist in the docs previously (I suspect
> this is the case, tho
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:22 PM, John Mandereau
wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 18.28 +, percival.music...@gmail.com
> ha scritto:
>> Are you sure about that? After disabling the
>> (make the "return to doc index" work) stuff
>
> Do you mean your patch?
I mean, change line 349:
-
Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 21.22 +0200, John Mandereau ha scritto:
> BTW it should also be
> "manuals.it.html", not "development...". I'm commenting this in on
> Rietveld.
Please ignore this, I just didn't know what I wrote at that moment.
Sorry :-P
John
signature.asc
Description: This i
Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 18.28 +, percival.music...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
> On 2010/10/17 16:52:03, John Mandereau wrote:
> > python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py:357: extra_depth = '../'
> > '../' is is not needed for translations, as output web pages are at
> the same
> > depth as the pa
On 2010/10/17 16:52:03, John Mandereau wrote:
python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py:357: extra_depth = '../'
'../' is is not needed for translations, as output web pages are at
the same
depth as the pages in English, and may cause errors in case server
configuration
doesn't redirect /.. to /. I
Besides the niptick, it looks good to me. I tested by building both
offline and online targets.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2520041/diff/1/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
File python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2520041/diff/1/python/auxiliar/postpr
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Build: another hack for translations (fix 1323).
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/2520041/
Affected files:
M python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
Index: python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
diff --git a/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
b/pytho
13 matches
Mail list logo
