Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-29 Thread David Kastrup
Valentin Villenave writes: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:32 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Seriously? I mean, no German would think about leaving off umlauts from >> a letter under any circumstance > > Well, in German it can alter the meaning (or at least

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:32 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Seriously? I mean, no German would think about leaving off umlauts from > a letter under any circumstance Well, in German it can alter the meaning (or at least distinguish between plural and singular). In French it’s a bit

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread David Kastrup
Valentin Villenave writes: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:07 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> I haven't seen a single reason why anyone would be wanting to use >> "francais" for specifying a notename language that calls d "ré". > > I’m fairly certain that it

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread Francisco Vila
El 28/02/2016 23:12, "David Kastrup" escribió: > > Francisco Vila writes: > > > 2016-02-28 22:01 GMT+01:00 : > >> Thanks. I really think we are better off without "francais". I think > >> the original motivation of "espanol" was to avoid

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:07 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > I haven't seen a single reason why anyone would be wanting to use > "francais" for specifying a notename language that calls d "ré". I’m fairly certain that it wouldn’t be used, ever. (Voluntarily, that is.) So this is a

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread David Kastrup
Francisco Vila writes: > 2016-02-28 22:01 GMT+01:00 : >> Thanks. I really think we are better off without "francais". I think >> the original motivation of "espanol" was to avoid trouble with loading >> "español.ly" (which would have been the original

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread Francisco Vila
2016-02-28 22:01 GMT+01:00 : > Thanks. I really think we are better off without "francais". I think > the original motivation of "espanol" was to avoid trouble with loading > "español.ly" (which would have been the original interface to languages) > system-independently. I vote

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread dak
Thanks. I really think we are better off without "francais". I think the original motivation of "espanol" was to avoid trouble with loading "español.ly" (which would have been the original interface to languages) system-independently.

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread v . villenave
On 2016/02/28 12:18:29, dak wrote: It seems to me (after glancing over it) like the last Rietveld review was just abandoned and the same state resubmitted. Greetings David, not entirely. I’ve removed the pointless convert-rules, among others. Any reason the suggestions have not been

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-28 Thread dak
It seems to me (after glancing over it) like the last Rietveld review was just abandoned and the same state resubmitted. Any reason the suggestions have not been addressed? https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-22 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Noeck wrote: > if you allow non-ascii letters in the note names (namely é in ré), why > not go all the way and call the language "français" instead of > "francais" (or at least in addition)? Greetings Joram, that’s exactly what this patch

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-22 Thread Noeck
Hi, if you allow non-ascii letters in the note names (namely é in ré), why not go all the way and call the language "français" instead of "francais" (or at least in addition)? Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: Define French as a separate input language (issue 288290043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

2016-02-22 Thread v . villenave
Reviewers: simon.albrecht, Message: On 2016/02/22 20:46:57, simon.albrecht wrote: https://codereview.appspot.com/288290043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):