2008/1/30, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> See Guile docs; there may be installed in Info format on your GNU/Linux
> system. I'm not a Scheme specialist, but I think you should generally
> consider RxRS as a standard specification, and always look at Guile docs
> to look for additional feat
Le mercredi 30 janvier 2008 à 10:32 +0100, Valentin Villenave a écrit :
> Wow, that's interesting! I have been browsing the whole R6RS
> specification to see if Scheme could accept fractions as arguments,
> but I couldn't come up with anything...
See Guile docs; there may be installed in Info form
2008/1/30, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> it's actually possible to have
>
> \func #2/3
>
> but you would loose the difference between 4/6 and 2/3
Wow, that's interesting! I have been browsing the whole R6RS
specification to see if Scheme could accept fractions as arguments,
but I coul
2008/1/29, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oh yes! as a matter of fact, the whole "\times 2/3" is included in my
> \t variable.
>
> Maybe the whole point is that users cannot define their own alias
> here. Would it be consistent to make it possible, by removing the
> hardcoded \times key
2008/1/29, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem is (as was discussed in that thread that we are repeating
> more and
> more of here) that you cannot create any such alias, at least not if you
> want to
> keep the syntax 2/3. You can certainly make an alias with syntax
> \t #2 #3 {musi
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/1/28, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
... hmm, I admit that it's annoying that your right hand needs to
hit the \ and then m keys; \tuplet has the advantage of using the
left hand for the t...
Definitely.
A year ago, I proposed to use the simple,
2008/1/28, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ... hmm, I admit that it's annoying that your right hand needs to
> hit the \ and then m keys; \tuplet has the advantage of using the
> left hand for the t...
Definitely.
A year ago, I proposed to use the simple, minimalistic \t keyword that
is b
Op maandag 28 januari 2008, schreef Trevor Daniels:
> I too oppose this as a mandatory change, and the
> creation of an alias. \times does exactly what
> the word 'times' implies and not what 'tuplet'
> would imply. The change would lead to still greater
> confusion, with new users writing the fr
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:36:20 -
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I too oppose this as a mandatory change, and the
> creation of an alias. \times does exactly what
> the word 'times' implies and not what 'tuplet'
> would imply. The change would lead to still greater
> confusion,
Bryan Stanbridge wote on 27 January 2008 21:38
>
> John Mandereau wrote:
> > There has already been a *huge* thread on the
> -user list about this, and
> > the conclusion was that the only realistic
> change we could do was
> > renaming \times to \tuplet, and nothing else;
> the point of my re
John Mandereau wrote:
There has already been a *huge* thread on the -user list about this, and
the conclusion was that the only realistic change we could do was
renaming \times to \tuplet, and nothing else; the point of my remark in
the bug tracker was to ask developers' opinion about actually do
11 matches
Mail list logo
