Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-15 Thread Paul Scott
Anthony Youngman wrote: Well, there's English, and there's "English". I've come across the term "anacrusis" and would never have thought of calling it a pickup. "lead in" or "upbeat" are the terms I mostly hear people use, I think. Obviously there are regional differences. Pickup which can be

RE: Problem with \partial

2006-07-14 Thread Anthony Youngman
:-) I talk about crotchets, minims etc. This mailing list is about the only place I ever meet terms like "quarter note". Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] u.org] On Behalf Of Erik Sandberg Sent: 13 July 2006 09:30 To: lilypond-devel@g

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-13 Thread Graham Percival
Erik Sandberg wrote: Anacrusis seems to be another related word: http://www.music.vt.edu/MUSICDICTIONARY/texta/Anacrusis.html A quick googling suggests that anacrusis and pickup seem to be the most correct terms, and then pickup is better because I have never heard the word anacrusis. (unfortun

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-13 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 23:01, Paul Scott wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > Erik Sandberg wrote: > >> On 7/9/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Erik Sandberg wrote: > >>> In an ideal world we wouldn't need workarounds like this, but it's > >>> useful to have a "fudge factor" \

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-12 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi, y'all -- Paul wrote: In my experience upbeat is the second half of a beat where downbeat is the first half of a beat. If it needs to be changed "pickup(s)" at least means what you seem to be referring to. For the record, "upbeat" and "pickup" are generally considered synonymous -- se

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-12 Thread Paul Scott
Graham Percival wrote: Erik Sandberg wrote: On 7/9/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Erik Sandberg wrote: In an ideal world we wouldn't need workarounds like this, but it's useful to have a "fudge factor" \partial. Perhaps we could rename it, and hide it somewhere in the manual un

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-12 Thread Graham Percival
Erik Sandberg wrote: On 7/9/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Erik Sandberg wrote: In an ideal world we wouldn't need workarounds like this, but it's useful to have a "fudge factor" \partial. Perhaps we could rename it, and hide it somewhere in the manual under "advanced tweaks"?

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-12 Thread Erik Sandberg
On 7/12/06, Mathieu Giraud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/6/06, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > please note that \partial or \upbeat, whatever you call it, has > musicologically a special meaning: the first, incomplete bar, and the last > bar of a piece or of a major section of a pi

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-12 Thread Mathieu Giraud
On 7/6/06, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: please note that \partial or \upbeat, whatever you call it, has musicologically a special meaning: the first, incomplete bar, and the last bar of a piece or of a major section of a piece (typically the bar before the next "||" bar glyph) shoul

Re: Problem with partial

2006-07-10 Thread Laura Conrad
> "Juergen" == Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> I am not sure, if line breaks by default should be Juergen> allowed only on true bar lines or also on pseudo bar Juergen> lines. In general, a repeat sign is one of the better places for a page break. -- Laura (m

RE: Problem with partial

2006-07-10 Thread Juergen Reuter
: Mats Bengtsson Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Juergen Reuter Subject: Re: Problem with partial Ah, ok; I understand. Still, I think that using \partial in this situation is kind of abuse that accidentally works. I guess the real problem here is that lily models repeat signs as bar lines; but I am also

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-10 Thread Erik Sandberg
On 7/10/06, Anthony Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Will \makebar handle \makebar { d4 d \bar "||" d d } which is a SINGLE bar? Yes, barlines and measures are separate concepts in lily (Timing contexts insert bar lines between measures). Erik ___

RE: Problem with \partial

2006-07-10 Thread Anthony Youngman
ubject: Re: Problem with \partial IMHO, I think the best practise for creating a single bar with length, is to use \set Timing.barLength = #(make-moment ...) at the beginning of the bar, plus a corresponding \unset after the bar. The set/unset is of course cumbersome, which is why some people curren

RE: Problem with partial

2006-07-10 Thread Anthony Youngman
hough... Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] u.org] On Behalf Of Juergen Reuter Sent: 07 July 2006 17:31 To: Mats Bengtsson Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Juergen Reuter Subject: Re: Problem with partial Ah, ok; I understand. Still, I think that

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-10 Thread Erik Sandberg
On 7/9/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Erik Sandberg wrote: > On Friday 07 July 2006 16:34, Graham Percival wrote: I'm convinced as far as proper notation goes. But I'd still like to have a "add time" command to avoid some bugs. I agree that it's a bad reason, but unless there's

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-09 Thread Graham Percival
Erik Sandberg wrote: On Friday 07 July 2006 16:34, Graham Percival wrote: \noTimeSignature c4 c c c | d d d d \partial 4 d | c c c c That's still a different concept than using \partial in the beginning of a piece. IMHO, using \partial mid-piece is bad practise, because it's difficult to rea

Re: Problem with partial

2006-07-07 Thread Juergen Reuter
Ah, ok; I understand. Still, I think that using \partial in this situation is kind of abuse that accidentally works. I guess the real problem here is that lily models repeat signs as bar lines; but I am also wondering how a repeat sign should actually look like, if it does not coincide with

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-07 Thread Juergen Reuter
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Graham Percival wrote: In my example, I _did_ state \noTimeSignature c4 c c c | d d d d \partial 4 d | c c c c ... and some contemporary music may want to change the number of beats in a bar without changing the notated time signature. Whatever we think of that practice

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-07 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Friday 07 July 2006 16:34, Graham Percival wrote: > Juergen Reuter wrote: > > For example, if a song with 4/4 meter starts with "\partial 4 f4", the > > last bar should, by convention, have a total length of 3 quarter notes. > > Having said that, you never should use "\partial" or "\upbeat" some

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-07 Thread Graham Percival
Juergen Reuter wrote: For example, if a song with 4/4 meter starts with "\partial 4 f4", the last bar should, by convention, have a total length of 3 quarter notes. Having said that, you never should use "\partial" or "\upbeat" somewhere within a piece. If lily nevertheless accepts it within a

Re: Problem with partial

2006-07-06 Thread Mats Bengtsson
One common example where people today use it in the middle of a score is repeats, where the repeat sign is in the middle of a bar (especially in combination with prima/secunda volta). Currently, LilyPond doesn't automatically take this into account. Of course, the best solution in this situation

RE: Problem with \partial

2006-07-06 Thread Anthony Youngman
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] u.org] On Behalf Of Erik Sandberg Sent: 06 July 2006 08:10 To: Graham Percival Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Problem with \partial On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:54, Graham Percival wrote: > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > Perhpaps \partia

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-06 Thread Juergen Reuter
Hi all, please note that \partial or \upbeat, whatever you call it, has musicologically a special meaning: the first, incomplete bar, and the last bar of a piece or of a major section of a piece (typically the bar before the next "||" bar glyph) should sum up to a complete bar. For example,

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-06 Thread Graham Percival
Erik Sandberg wrote: On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:54, Graham Percival wrote: IMO, \partial is just fine. If there's some confusion, by all means we can clarify the docs. As always, I gratefully accept any specific recommendations for doc changes. IMHO using \partial in the middle of a bar is

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-06 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:54, Graham Percival wrote: > Erik Sandberg wrote: > > Perhpaps \partial should be renamed to \upbeat or similar, in order to > > prevent this kind of confusion? (\partial only indicates that a bar is > > shortened, while \upbeat indicates that the command only is releva

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-05 Thread Graham Percival
Erik Sandberg wrote: Perhpaps \partial should be renamed to \upbeat or similar, in order to prevent this kind of confusion? (\partial only indicates that a bar is shortened, while \upbeat indicates that the command only is relevant for upbeats) So what happens here? \noTimeSignature c4 c c c

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-05 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 12:02, Thies Albrecht wrote: > Hi Owen! > > Dr A V Le Blanc schrieb: > > I have a problem with \partial, which doesn't seem to be > > covered in the docs or examples I've found. > > > > I have a piece in 4/4 with the first measure having one beat, > > while the last has 3.

Re: Problem with \partial

2006-07-05 Thread Thies Albrecht
Hi Owen! Dr A V Le Blanc schrieb: I have a problem with \partial, which doesn't seem to be covered in the docs or examples I've found. I have a piece in 4/4 with the first measure having one beat, while the last has 3. There are 4 voices, and in each of them I begin with something like this