Anthony W. Youngman wrote Sunday, November 22, 2009 8:06 PM
In message
,
Frédéric Bron writes
create a mount point:
$ mkdir /mnt/Share
then add the following line to /etc/fstab:
Share /mnt/Share vboxsf defaults 0 0
Hmm. Is there any way to have this pre-configured? i.e. tell
uses to creat
In message
, Frédéric
Bron writes
create a mount point:
$ mkdir /mnt/Share
then add the following line to /etc/fstab:
Share /mnt/Share vboxsf defaults 0 0
Hmm. Is there any way to have this pre-configured? i.e. tell
uses to create
C:\lilybuntu-share\
in windows (or create i
>> create a mount point:
>> $ mkdir /mnt/Share
>> then add the following line to /etc/fstab:
>> Share /mnt/Share vboxsf defaults 0 0
>
> Hmm. Is there any way to have this pre-configured? i.e. tell
> uses to create
> C:\lilybuntu-share\
> in windows (or create it for them), and h
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 06:44:38PM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > The only two problems I've yet to resolve are how to share files
> > with my Windows host
>
> Create a directory in windows for that, let's say d:\Share
> Then you go in VirtualBox, click on the virtual machine name and in
> the me
2009/11/22 Trevor Daniels :
> The only two problems I've yet to resolve are how to share files
> with my Windows host
I usually open the Places menu and choose 'connect to a host', this
opens a file browser on the host if you know its IP and select a
proper protocol. Sorry for not giving more det
> The only two problems I've yet to resolve are how to share files
> with my Windows host
Create a directory in windows for that, let's say d:\Share
Then you go in VirtualBox, click on the virtual machine name and in
the menu "Machine/Preferences".
Here you find shared directories where you can ad
Jonathan Kulp wrote Friday, June 12, 2009 8:59 PM
The .iso is finished uploading and is ready for testing by whoever
wants to
try it. Download here:
http://prodet.hu/bert/lilydev/lilybuntu.iso
It's 716 MB, so it won't fit on a CD. If you're using a virtual
machine you
don't have to worry ab
Graham,
Yes, I have used VMWare before, but only very very briefly. I'm
downloading the `lilybuntu' iso at the moment, and will get back to you
after I have managed to run it (I'll keep a note of all my steps in
case anyone wants to repeat after me...).
Tim W.
Graham Percival wrote:
On
A quick update:
- tried Anjuta - couldn't import LilyPond
- tried KDevelop - there were problems with it regarding setting
different arguments to lilypond
- tried Eclipse CDT - after some tutorial about importing the project
(http://moblin.org/documentation/moblin-sdk/coding-tutorials/getting-st
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
Jonathan, only one issue:
- If a command is not found (like typing 'asdf' in the terminal
window), some python script is telling errors. Is that intentional?
Can you post the terminal output from this? The only message I see
when
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
Jonathan, only one issue:
- If a command is not found (like typing 'asdf' in the terminal window),
some python script is telling errors. Is that intentional?
Can you post the terminal output from this? The only message I
see when I do this is as follow
Jonathan, only one issue:
- If a command is not found (like typing 'asdf' in the terminal window),
some python script is telling errors. Is that intentional?
Just for the record:
- On Asus EEE 901 KDevelop works very well using this VirtualBox +
LilyUbuntu setup, running on a pen drive.
- I
Well, Eclipse runs very well on my netbook with Atom and 2gb ram. But the cdt
is still very limited. Also its startup from the pen drive is too slop. But
kdevelop seems all right, which has ctags integration and looks up macro
definitions in a second.
Bert
___
Hi,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <20090614225255.ga7...@nagi>, Graham Percival
> writes
> >2) I don't know what the current favorite fancy IDE is, although
> >I'm fairly certain that Eclipse runs on Linux. I'm not certain if
> >that would actually be good for Li
In message <20090614225255.ga7...@nagi>, Graham Percival
writes
2) I don't know what the current favorite fancy IDE is, although
I'm fairly certain that Eclipse runs on Linux. I'm not certain if
that would actually be good for LilyPond, though -- does it
support C++ and makefiles? IIRC eclips
Yes, that was a good idea. Now I'm gonna try this thing out on my Eee Pc. :)
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Now I'm running lilybuntu in Sun VirtualBox from my pendrive.
Successfully
built LilyPond, now I start playing with kdevelop.
Thanks for the fun.
Bert
Cool! Thanks for
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Now I'm running lilybuntu in Sun VirtualBox from my pendrive. Successfully
built LilyPond, now I start playing with kdevelop.
Thanks for the fun.
Bert
Cool! Thanks for testing, Bert. Did you get the Guest Additions
installed successfully?
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http
Now I'm running lilybuntu in Sun VirtualBox from my pendrive. Successfully
built LilyPond, now I start playing with kdevelop.
Thanks for the fun.
Bert
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:44:30PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>> On 6/13/09 11:39 PM, "Bertalan Fodor" wrote:
>
> (again, I'm happy to dump whatever suggestions people throw at me
> in the CG)
A very nice IDE with editor and debugger (the latter is really nice
IMHO) for python -- both available for Linux and Windows -- is Eric:
http://eric-ide.python-projects.org/
Werner
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:44:30PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 6/13/09 11:39 PM, "Bertalan Fodor" wrote:
I'm sure there are tools which would make it easier for us, simple not
hackers, but software engineers, grown up on Microsoft Visual Studio end
Eclipse. I reme
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:44:30PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 6/13/09 11:39 PM, "Bertalan Fodor" wrote:
>
> > I'm sure there are tools which would make it easier for us, simple not
> > hackers, but software engineers, grown up on Microsoft Visual Studio end
> > Eclipse. I remember that a
gt;
> Cc: Tim Wilkinson , lilypond-devel@gnu.org
>
> Subject: Re: development on windows
>
>
>
>
> On 6/13/09 8:43 AM, "Bertalan Fodor" wrote:
>
>> What tools can be used to develop? To debug, browse the source, etc?
>
> Compiling: gcc
- Original message
From: Carl D. Sorensen
Sent: 13 Jun 2009 20:15 -06:00
To: Bertalan Fodor , Jonathan Kulp
Cc: Tim Wilkinson , lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: development on windows
On 6/13/09 8:43 AM, "Bertalan Fodor" wrote:
> What tools can be used to develo
On 6/13/09 8:43 AM, "Bertalan Fodor" wrote:
> What tools can be used to develop? To debug, browse the source, etc?
Compiling: gcc
Debugging: gdb
Guile/Scheme testing: guile
Browse the source: more, vi
Search the source: git grep
HTH,
Carl
___
l
What tools can be used to develop? To debug, browse the source, etc?
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
> Bert, if you send me ftp login info privately I can upload it to your
> server. Maybe I can do it at the office in evening hours and it'll go a lot
> faster. I only have 256K upload speed at home. :(
>
>
>
The .iso is finished uploading an
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:02:22PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> Why not make a shell script that gets the lilypond source code, and make
>> that part of your distribution?
>
> I'd thought of that but I don't yet know how to make a file appear in a
> user's home director
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
After making the .iso I tested it in Sun VirtualBox OSE and
everything worked perfectly. Here are the exact steps I followed
(see if you think they're noob-friendly enough):
1. Install the OS in VirtualBox, then restart the virtual machine
and log in
2. open a terminal
On 6/11/09 4:50 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>>>
>> The goal of this iso to make it usable on a virtualization tool. The
>> open source Sun VirtualBox can for example mount this as the virtual
>> hard disk.
>>> Once it's ready maybe I can create a to
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > > Success! Ok here's what I have:
> > >
> > > lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
> >
> > And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
> > cut t
Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Success! Ok here's what I have:
lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
cut the network transfer by more than half.
Cheers,
- Graham
I did bzip2 without
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > Success! Ok here's what I have:
> >
> > lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
>
> And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
> cut the network transfer by more than half
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Success! Ok here's what I have:
>
> lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
cut the network transfer by more than half.
Cheers,
- Graham
__
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
The goal of this iso to make it usable on a virtualization tool. The
open source Sun VirtualBox can for example mount this as the virtual
hard disk.
Once it's ready maybe I can create a torrent? I've never done that
before but it's probably the best way
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <
lilypondt...@organum.hu> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> Tim, have you used VMware before? This should allow you to
>>> compile LilyPond inside a virtual machine. I'm not certain what
>>> the best way is to transfer the iso from Jonathan to you,
Tim, have you used VMware before? This should allow you to
compile LilyPond inside a virtual machine. I'm not certain what
the best way is to transfer the iso from Jonathan to you, though.
The goal of this iso to make it usable on a virtualization tool. The
open source Sun VirtualBox ca
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:52:13PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> Tim, have you used VMware before? This should allow you to
>> compile LilyPond inside a virtual machine. I'm not certain what
>> the best way is to transfer the iso from Jonathan to you, though.
>
> Once it
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:20:55PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Thanks Graham. There was a ton of stuff owned by root in the lybook-db/
directory. I tried your command to xarg rm -rf but it said permission denied
(even though I did it as sudo and typed the password).
Oh y
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:20:55PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Thanks Graham. There was a ton of stuff owned by root in the lybook-db/
> directory. I tried your command to xarg rm -rf but it said permission denied
> (even though I did it as sudo and typed the password).
Oh yeah... IIRC if you do
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:43:56PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > Err... "GUB" stands for "Grand Unified Binary". It was a play on
> > the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) of physics.
>
> Interesting. So did the name evolve over time? Now
Op zondag 07-06-2009 om 07:46 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
Vila:
> whete BTW it also says
>
>bin/gub - the Gub Universal Builder
this is just the one build script. I/we needed an U to make
the name bin/gub here ; possibly that's misleading.
I had the idea of adding
Patrick McCarty wrote Sunday, June 07, 2009 6:43 AM
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Francisco Vila a écrit :
2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
downlo
2009/6/7 Patrick McCarty :
> Interesting. So did the name evolve over time? Now it appears to be
> called the Grand Unified Builder:
>
> http://lilypond.org/gub/
>
> -Patrick
see also
http://github.com/janneke/gub
or
http://lilypond.org/~janneke/vc/gub.git/
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (
2009/6/7 Graham Percival :
> Err... "GUB" stands for "Grand Unified Binary". It was a play on
> the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) of physics.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=GUB&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-devel&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Aearly
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
>> Francisco Vila a écrit :
>>> 2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
>>>
Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe".
>>>
>>> GUB is the builder,
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Francisco Vila a écrit :
>> 2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
>>
>>> Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
>>> downloaded .exe".
>>
>> GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
>> builder
Francisco Vila a écrit :
2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe".
GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their
names.
Agreed. We
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, June 06, 2009 11:18 AM
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:03:58AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
- does anybody feel like making cygwin packages for the missing
software?
Well, for some time I used to be the cygwin maintainer of lilypond.
Was quite nightmare.
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux ins
2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
> Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
> downloaded .exe".
GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their
names.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.pacone
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:03:58AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
>
>> There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
>> LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people *with*
>> Windows machines, not from the actual mach
Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people *with*
Windows machines, not from the actual machines themselves)
As I understand it, people with Windows can:
- run GUB
Jonathan Kulp a écrit :
What I don't understand is how the permissions got jacked up in the
first place. I didn't do anything different this time than I usually
do. I've never had the permissions problem before. Maybe I put a
"sudo" in there inadvertently but I don't recall doing any sudos unt
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:11:35PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > Reading music-glossary.tely...
> > Dissecting...
> > lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.13.1
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "../../scripts/lilypond-book.py"
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:11:35PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Reading music-glossary.tely...
> Dissecting...
> lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.13.1
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "../../scripts/lilypond-book.py", line 2108, in
> main ()
> File "../../scripts/lilypond-book
I've done a fresh Ubuntu install on my 2nd partition so I can create this
lily-dev remix. Lilypond built successfully but the user documentation is
failing very early in the process. The CG built correctly, but none of the
stuff in user/ is building. Can anyone see what the problem is from this
er
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
under 700MB to fit on a CD. I would go with Debian but the tool
"remastersys" is specifically made for doing Ubuntu remixes and I'm not
sure it would work with straight Debian.
I was wrong about this. It's for Debian or Ubuntu. I can do Debian
if you think it's bette
As we are looking for windows-experienced developers I really think that
the ubuntu way would be better, it is easier for us windowsers.
If you guys think it would be useful then I'll have a go at it. I
think I can remaster xubuntu with all the Lilypond build tools and get
it under 700MB to
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:44:27AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Can't all of the tools be installed from inside the virtual machine?
Yes, but since window users will already be faced with an
unfamiliar environment, we might as well set up the build
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:44:27AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> Can't all of the tools be installed from inside the virtual machine?
Yes, but since window users will already be faced with an
unfamiliar environment, we might as well set up the build system
for them.
**IF
BTW, having said all of this, I actually have an .iso of my own remix
of xubuntu that has all of the Lilypond build tools installed already.
It's kind of big, about 1.1GB, so it either has to go on a DVD or it
can be used as an .iso to install it in a virtual machine. I used a
tool called "re
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would
recommend this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then
install the additional t
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would
recommend this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional t
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would recommend
this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional tools, and share the re
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would recommend
this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional tools, and share the resulting virtual disk.
Bert
Graham P
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:26:41PM +0200, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>
>> - does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
>> making a small Linux installation which has all the required
>> software? Potential contributors would be able to run this
>> in the free VMwar
- does anybody feel like making cygwin packages for the missing
software?
Well, for some time I used to be the cygwin maintainer of lilypond. Was
quite nightmare.
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux installation which has all the required
67 matches
Mail list logo
