Re: Skylines and certain grob properties (rotation, extra-offset)

Hi all, Thanks for the confirmation, we all seem to agree that grob rotation should be taken into account when creating skylines, whereas extra-offset should stay as it is, i.e. not affect the skylines. Carl Sorensen-3 wrote > If it doesn't slow the code down too much, I would be in favor of

Re: Skylines and certain grob properties (rotation, extra-offset)

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> What do you think about making skylines consider the grob > >> properties rotation and extra-offset? > >> > >> (1) keep everything as it is > >> (2) skylines should reflect both grob rotation and grob extra-offset > >>

Re: Skylines and certain grob properties (rotation, extra-offset)

>> What do you think about making skylines consider the grob >> properties rotation and extra-offset? >> >> (1) keep everything as it is >> (2) skylines should reflect both grob rotation and grob extra-offset >> (3) skylines should reflect grob rotation only >> (4) skylines should reflect grob

Re: Skylines and certain grob properties (rotation, extra-offset)

On 4/20/18, 7:44 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Torsten Hämmerle" wrote: What do you think about making skylines consider the grob properties rotation and extra-offset? (1) keep

Re: Skylines and certain grob properties (rotation, extra-offset)

On 20.04.2018 15:43, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: What do you think about making skylines consider the grob properties rotation and extra-offset? (1) keep everything as it is (2) skylines should reflect both grob rotation and grob extra-offset (3) skylines should reflect grob rotation only (4)

Skylines and certain grob properties (rotation, extra-offset)

Hello developers, When dealing with skylines in issue #5307 "Skyline Refinements (Rounded Boxes and Rotated Ellipses)" , I noticed that the rotation grob property is not reflected in the skylines at all. At present, skylines do not know