On 2011-01-05 15:17, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:33:26 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled
Hey Graham,
Could you please put me under programming?
Thanks!
Mike
On Jan 5, 2011, at 12:44 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if
@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of
m...@apollinemike.com [m...@apollinemike.com]
Sent: 05 January 2011 12:29
To: Graham Percival
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: lilypond authors, release notes, announcements
Hey Graham,
Could you please put me under
Am 05.01.2011 10:32, schrieb James:
Hello,
On 05/01/2011 05:44, Graham Percival wrote:
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be
Marc,
On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
sign
(which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
Au contraire mon amis!
I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
It helps the 'beginners' (I find) that I play with
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a body of text. I suppose some would call it a 'logotype' or
colophon.
tagline = \markup {
On 2011-01-05 11:09, James wrote:
Marc,
On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
sign
(which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
Au contraire mon amis!
I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
Dito.
It
Am 05.01.2011 11:09, schrieb James:
Marc,
On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
sign
(which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
Au contraire mon amis!
I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
It helps the
On 2011-01-05 11:13, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a body of text. I suppose some would call it a
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be in development team, and choose your own title. If not,
you should be listed in current
Hello
On 05/01/2011 10:36, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2011-01-05 11:13, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a
On 2011-01-05 12:11, James wrote:
No this isn't what I was referring to. [...]
I was thinking more of a 'lilypond' in some
cursive-cum-signature-cum-all-joined-up script,
but something 'created' as a glyph than just put together.
If you think of J S Bach's signature then that could be used
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:11:26AM +, James wrote:
Hello
On 05/01/2011 10:36, Alexander Kobel wrote:
I've mused about trying to create a logo using the markup
commands. If you think about all the graphical ones, plus music
glyphs, there's a lot of options. The d could be a rotated
2011/1/5 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a body of text. I suppose some would call it
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
together, just for the sake of quoting musical symbols.
You mean something like this?
On 2011-01-05 12:58, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
together, just for the sake of quoting
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
together,
Am 05.01.2011 13:33, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Brunifedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO;
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:20:06 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
Yup, that's what I meant. I know a couple of amateur musicians who
copied some musical symbols to replace single characters of their names
for their letterheads. I can't think of a single one which doesn't look
ugly. Sizes
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:33:26 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:17:51PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:33:26 schrieb Graham Percival:
That looks quite busy to my taste. My latest 5-minute hack is
something like this:
Attached is a small modification (created in inkscape rather than
Colin,
On 05/01/2011 13:33, Colin Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 +, James wrote:
You should probably move me from Documentation to Bug Squad, James. At
the moment, I don't think I can manage both, but perhaps I can return to
the fold later in the year!
No problem.
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:30:29PM +, James wrote:
Colin,
On 05/01/2011 13:33, Colin Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 +, James wrote:
You should probably move me from Documentation to Bug Squad, James. At
the moment, I don't think I can manage both, but perhaps I can
Le 5 janv. 2011 à 11:37, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Since I haven't been very active on the LilyPond lists the last year, I think
it would be appropriate to remove my name from the Current development team
list.
Mine too, please. I don't think I've done anything in this release.
Nicolas
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:59:58PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Le 5 janv. 2011 à 11:37, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Since I haven't been very active on the LilyPond lists the last year, I
think it would be appropriate to remove my name from the Current
development team list.
Mine too,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 08:43:47PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:38 +, Graham Percival wrote:
I think you should be listed in both places; I certainly don't
think you should removed from the Documentation list. If somebody
has worked in multiples areas, they
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be in development team, and choose your own title. If not,
you should be listed in current
27 matches
Mail list logo
