- Original Message -
From: "pls"
To: "Phil Holmes"
> There are a number of commercial products that, given a perfect
> representation of a score, convert it to perfect musicXML - so it can't
> be that hard.
Hm, could you name some, please? I
lists no longer appear in the terminal output during make doc.
There are some translated versions of this part of the manual - could a
translator update these to gain the full benefit, please?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
id Kastrup
Great catch, thanks. without -jX it froze, as you say, waiting keyboard
input. New patch set uploaded including /dev/null which does not have this
problem.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https
x27;t
like the parentheses, since I assume a parenthesis cannot be part of a
variable name. As a result it throws the following warning:
notation/input.texi:1350: warning: unlikely character ( in @var.
Ignore, replace the @var with @code, or what?
d. Anyone object if I create these as empty directories?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
mmands directly, but let's do it
anyway.
Recipe for trouble with a multi-output format like Texinfo. Either use
@var{position} or @samp{(x . y)}, those are intended forms.
--
David Kastrup
Thanks David. @samp it is.
--
Phil Holmes
___
li
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel Team"
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: extract-texi-filenames - missing directories
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:44:31PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
When make do
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel Team"
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: extract-texi-filenames - missing directories
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 04:13:42PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Origin
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: ; "David Kastrup"
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Minor documentation nitpick
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 1:00 PM
Subject: R
x27;s a much
simplified version of the previous version which was littered with comments.
I'll add a comment as requested.
@David: think I'd prefer to stick with the shell script now, having got this
far down the road.
--
Phil Holmes
_
be executed is a
_shell_ command. So I am really quite doubtful that we reduce
complexity with this shell script which, after all, also needs to gets
called with the correct path.
I'm not trying to reduce complexity - rather to make "make doc" produce less
output.
--
Phil Hol
quot;bin/../gub/commands.py", line 75, in execute
ignore_errors=self.ignore_errors)
File "bin/../gub/loggedos.py", line 93, in system
raise misc.SystemFailed (m)
SystemFailed: Command barfed: /usr/bin/python
bin/gib --platform=darwin-x86 --branch=guile= --branch=lilypond=git.sv.
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failure
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:40:54PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
ERROR: ld.so: object
'/home/gub/gub/targe
ot.com/5650064/diff/5003/stepmake/stepmake/texinfo-rules.make#newcode75
stepmake/stepmake/texinfo-rules.make:75:
$(buildscript-dir)/run-and-check "$(MAKEINFO) -I$(src-dir) -I$(outdir)
--no-split --no-headers --output $@ $<" "$*.makeinfo.log"
.makeinfotxt.log
http://codereview
to label any
issue they can't verify themselves with a label such as Needs_dev_to_verify
or something like that. This will show they've looked at it and prevent
other squadders wasting time on it. Are there any objections to this?
--
Phil Holmes
_
. I
know David also does some pushes, but I believe he's also now running a
multi-CPU build.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: make dist broken
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:03:36PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Well - that's clearly down to my adding those files
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To:
Cc: "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:50 PM
Subject: make dist broken
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.30/Documentation/cs/included/GNUmakefile
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2
ood from next Monday on.
James has been struggling with connectivity and would likely be able to help
once that's sorted.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: make dist broken
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:14:53PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
So - presumably make dist creates the tarball, and as part
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
It's
challenging to decide when I should nag people (or "clarify the
situation") or not.
I thought you always erred on the side of nagging people :-)
- Graham
--
Phil Holmes
___
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: make dist broken
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:24:23PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I did look, but in the end it was easier to find the proble
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Julien Rioux" ; "David Kastrup" ;
"LilyPond Developers"
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: Rietveld patchy: test run
On Wed, F
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: make dist broken
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, Feb
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: make dist broken
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, Feb
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: make dist broken
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:18:02PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
OK -as remarked in my previous mail patchy-merge fails
have a mentor? Maybe Janek?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651077/
Janek is away until after Sunday. Pavel - please feel free to send it to me
if you want it pushed sooner.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
hat it's so simple, as you say, I'll do this and push to staging
soon.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Pavel Roskin"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: recommend setting ragged-last-bottom to false
forlargescores(issue 5651077)
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Roskin"
I
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: recommend setting ragged-last-bottom to
falseforlargescores(issue 5651077)
"Phil Holmes" writes:
Normally you'd send a patch, which would
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: recommend setting ragged-last-bottom to
falseforlargescores(issue 5651077)
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I assume you're contras
Looks OK.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ms to pick up a semi-random set of files and to process them
incompletely. I reckon the output comes from mutopia-index.py.
Seems to me this could easily be removed from the current doc build?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-
http://codereview.appspot.com/5494069/
Willdo tomorrow.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
e previous text file with
diff. The text files are each about 5 megs but will probably zip well. Are
you interested in the output from make doc -s, plus the file listings and
diffs?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-dev
Help with this gratefully received.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
t no spare processes were running. Ran
patchy again and again got the "Stopped" message. Then remembered I'd been
putting debug stuff in my local copy that included a line:
test=raw_input("Stopped")
Thunk. Thunk. Hit return a
al patch to somebody for pushing.
Janek is away until after Sunday.
I'm back and i can push it if you send me patch file.
cheers,
Janek
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651077/
I pushed the one-word change.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-
would say "myself" rather than "me".
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
other changes to reduce noise in
make doc and was then going to experiment with the "odd" make files there.
Problem is - does someone, somewhere, use that makefile?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
. We
then have the problem of what to do with the warning.
2) Use run-and-check to push both to logfiles
3) Add an option to midi2ly to suppress output and warnings and use this in
the build.
2 is easiest, but adds yet more logfiles and loses a potentially useful
warning. Any though
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Campbell"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [frogs] Re: New frog in an empty pond?
On 12-02-25 03:32 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Janek WarchoĊ"
Fortunately it's
rg/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/generating-documentation#documentation-editor_0027s-edit_002fcompile-cycle)
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
e f
}
\new Voice \with {
\consists Mark_engraver
\consists "Staff_collecting_engraver"
}
{ s4 s s s
\mark \markup { "Play violently" }
s4 s s s
}
>>
}
>>
\layout
, that would be an anonymous (readonly) connection not requiring
authentication.
--
David Kastrup
Seemed to me that savannah was down full stop. Now up again, but not tried a
push.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-deve
CAB; and (c)
I don't want to leave that machine running unattended.
It takes 17 minutes to run on the fast box.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
th, I think I'd run them as separate users, to avoid problems with
one affecting the git repo of build directory of another.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
oc-export] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/main/src/gub'
OK. This pretty much looks like a side effect of
http://codereview.appspot.com/5696073/ which stops creating a file called
examples.html. I'll have a look at rsync-lily-
;ll assume you're
running patchy-staging now, and won't run it unless you mail me if you lose
internet... Oh. Well. I'll run it if I see master is well out of date -
say 18 hours or so.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel maili
Patch attached.
--
Phil Holmes
0001-Removes-examples.html-from-rsynched-files.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Graham,
This GUB patch should take the shortcut with the non-existent target out of
the windows build. Untested, because I can't, but I believe it's correct.
--
Phil Holmes
0002-Fixes-Issue-2373.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lily
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: Patch to GUB to fix Issue 2373
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:52:04AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
This GUB patch should take the
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: Various updates to reduce make doc output (issue 5727055)
I think the scrips abc2ly and midi2ly are useful as stand-alone tools,
i.e. outside of the build system, in which case users might sti
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I'd like to push Reinhold's patch at http://codereview.appspot.com/5674101/
but don't want to usurp ownership. If I look at the patch on Reitveld,
there's no identification information. Is there any way to get this from
Reitveld to push the correctly-identified pat
Official regtests are nice and clean.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ken-staging,
and delete the staging branch. Unfortunately it's too late now,
but hopefully next time we can avoid damage that way.
- Graham
As an improvement to patchy, wouldn't it be better for patchy to test for a
"stop-patchy" branch and abort if it finds one? Then all th
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Peekay" ; "Colin Hall" ;
"Eluze" ; "Marek Klein" ; "Ralph
Palmer"
Cc: "Graham Percival" ;
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 4:46 PM
Subject: Git problem
If you read .d
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Steinmetzger"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: Floating markup / Markup takes too much space
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:37:50PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Dear list
> >
> I am
you have a successful make doc, you might be surprised how little time
it takes to remake to check changes now. On my admittedly quick machine,
make -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 LANGS='' doc takes about 5 seconds.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-de
Apart from that, we have enough trouble getting Lilypond to build,
let alone a different product. Have you asked on the Denemo mailing lists?
I believe Graham has push access to the GUB repo, and so you could post
patches here and it's possible he'll upda
7;ve seen Mike stuff. "release the penguins" seems quite normal.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
No differences from 2.15.32.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
hours (compared with make ib
lilypond build, which takes 1 minute 5 seconds).
I've definitely got a usable windows executable. I can't find the install
packages - is there another command to run, or a secret place to look?
--
Phil Holmes
ct only is only guaranteed for staff lines,
since staff lines are in a lower layer than most other grobs.
Seems to me it's not a good regtest if it's not consistent?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
h
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: GUB success?
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:10:41PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I think I have GUB running properly. I gave up tryi
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: GUB success?
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:19:24PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Grah
OK - the issue causing the fail was the lack of a regtest tarball, which I
knew how to fix. There were a couple of other problems, but I have
definitely now successfully run GUB and got installation media. More
details to follow.
--
Phil Holmes
addition of:
%% dummy action to deal with parser lookahead
#(display "this needs to be here, sorry!")
Does that need to be there for just the de manuals?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lis
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Docs/scheme help
"Phil Holmes" writes:
Could someone who understands scheme (David?) take a quick look and
compare
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documenta
27;re only likely to run --quiet as part of doc build, and it's not a
warning you want to see every time you run make doc, I think it's better to
suppress this one.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ; ;
;
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: Various updates to reduce make doc output (issue 5727055)
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:31:35PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Origina
- Original Message -
From: "Julien Rioux"
To: "Phil Holmes"
>
> It seems just not worth it. We _never_ want to check warnings as part of
> make doc. That's what regression tests are for.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
I disagree, make -s doc is us
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Various updates to reduce make doc output (issue 5727055)
Phil Holmes wrote Wednesday, March 14, 2012 12:00 PM
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: Failed make doc for Patchy
James writes:
I am not at home but Patchy complained just now.
Shall I run patchy and check the logfiles?
--
P
own, and I always check the time it takes.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
, I was still bitten when I had a snippet added on my system which
wasn't in git - so patchy still prevents problems to master.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Carl Sorensen" ; "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: Various updates to reduce make doc output (issue 5727055)
Carl Sorensen wrote Wednes
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Trevor Daniels" ; "Carl Sorensen"
; "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Various updates to reduce make doc output (issue 5727055)
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Trevor Daniels" ; "Carl Sorensen"
; "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Various updates to reduce make doc output (issue 5727055)
- Original Message -
From: "Julien Rioux"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:45 PM
Subject: Re: log files not deleted by doc-clean
On 26/02/2012 8:30 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
Not sure if that's a good thing or not - it could be argued that you can
go back an
ild that you've done this:
touch regtests/ignore
# Restart the build
make -jx lilypond
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
te that string.
Julien
Never understood what that was for - just copied other examples. It's to do
with translations, then?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ks,
Carl
Simpler to run on a clean system other than patchy. I'll apply the patch
and run make, make doc and make test and let you know.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
nks,
Carl
Clean here. Push to staging.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
airpin #'to-barline = ##f
c'1\> \break c\! \break
c\> c\!
\override Hairpin #'to-barline = ##t
c\> c\!
}
Am I missing an over-ride to make this happen?
--
Phil Holmes
<>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Clean.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
eeded output from make doc.
Thanks.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
rmat string for all
and be done with it rather than using subordinate format calls and
string-append.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5905052/
I did say I know nothing about the language. I'd happily accept a code
snippet.
--
Phil Holmes
__
ck.py", line 132, in main
check_files (tarball, repo)
File "test-lily/dist-check.py", line 117, in check_files
raise Exception ('dist error found')
Exception: dist error found
Is this happening with a GUB build or something else?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Hohl"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: German translation request
Am 26.03.2012 12:15, schrieb James:
Hello
On 25 March 2012 14:10, Phil Holmes wrote:
In Notation/wind.itely, please could the following be changed
As you can guess, that's the logfile produced when lily runs multiple jobs
simultaneously. It also produces logfiles called something like multicpu0.log
- look in the same directory for these - they'll have the most recent
timestamp, too.
Phil Holmes
- Original Message ---
I'm subscribed to -auto as a mailing list, but for stuff like this, it fits
my workflow better as a newsgroup. Bugs and devel are also newsgroups on
the gmane server, but I can't find auto. Should it be there?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lily
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: Lilypond-auto - newsgroup?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:31:11PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'm subscribed to -auto as a ma
I'll get test-patches running over the weekend. Should be able to run it
regularly when David's away, because I've just started 2 weeks holiday from
college.
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond-auto - newsgroup?
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
ion of suggested enhancements! I hope your exams
don't suffer!
Most look excellent to me, but I have comments on a couple of them which
I'll add to the issues themselves.
Trevor
+1.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
to Phil's website last night. As far as I know, this is
good to go.
James
I use LilyDev quite a bit - a slightly out of date version. The only
machine for which this is not true is the Ubuntu 64-bit "real" machine I use
pdated lsr-tarball before sending it back to Sebastiano, then
a shell-script to do so should be created. But that's beyond my
knowledge.
-Harm
If you send my (or James) updated text for the CG, one or other of us will
add it.
--
Phil Holmes
ese in the LSR.
Don't think it'll take that long. I'd then check and approve them - so if I
took 10 and you 2 share the others out, that should be fair? What do you
think?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lil
901 - 1000 of 2094 matches
Mail list logo
