On 12/22/06, William Oram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been toying with two-pass vertical spacing. Pretty neat, and
exactly what I need. A couple questions:
1) Is it *supposed* to force each system onto a separate page? That
seems to be what it's doing: splitting pages with multiple systems.
Geoff Horton wrote:
I was afraid of this kind of answer, if define-music-function cant do
something as simple as replace one note on a \transpose without
writing a
whole bunch of code... I'm not going to bother with it myself. Too much
complexity, I'd rather look for something that will let me
Frédéric Chiasson wrote:
Might it be possible to use
\tuplet 3:2 {x x x}
for the usual operation, and if we want to have many tuplets of the
same kind, to use
\tuplet 3:2 { {x x x} {y y y} {z z z} }
Might resolve the clarity problems.
That sounds like a great idea! (or some similar syntax
> Dear Bob, you did give me some hope. I thought that not knowing a
> thing about programming was my problem, maybe being too stupid or
> lazy to understand what should be clear to me. But I see that you
> are indeed a software developer and still can have trouble with a
> programm.
Friends, Mats
I'm trying to write a hymn in Spanish. Sometimes there are two syllables on
one note (not uncommon in hymns in Spanish, usually two vowels come together)
and there are some pairs of notes which take two syllables in some verses and
one in others. I tried putting numbers after the syllables, but
Might it be possible to use
\tuplet 3:2 {x x x}
for the usual operation, and if we want to have many tuplets of the same
kind, to use
\tuplet 3:2 { {x x x} {y y y} {z z z} }
Might resolve the clarity problems.
Frédéric
2006/12/22, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 22, 2006, at 4.00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:37:41 +0100
From: Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Two-Pass Vertical Spacing
To: William Oram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/p
Jonathan Henkelman wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys lilypond.org> writes:
>> If we are going to worry about seperating the music from the
>> typesetting,
then
>> it is worth observing that these two are equivalent musically.
>> It doesn't
> No, they aren't. The stresses fall in different places. In b
El Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:50:00 -0600
Quentin Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I found this problem in my attempt to upgrade the lilypond available
> with Fedora 5 to 2.10.2. It seems there was a change in the configure
> script between 2.10.0 and 2.10.1.
yes, i also diff'ed the files and
Thanks,
Browsing the manual GEMA looks like it could work to do both substitution
and conditional outputting, I'll try it.
Rick
Eduardo Vieira-3 wrote:
>
> Citando "Rick Hansen (aka RickH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>>
>> If you have done this can you share it or sell it to me? (please don
The simple explanation is probably that it's much more
difficult to make an upgrade package that works correctly
than to make a clean installation package.
What are your problems to uninstall LilyPond?
/Mats
Cesar Penagos wrote:
Dearest Lilyponders:
When I started with lilypond 2.6, I remem
First of all, I recommend you to take a look at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-08/msg00130.html
If you want to stick with the complicated template, the best and simplest
way for you to figure out the answer yourself, if just to change the
values of some property and look at t
Well, well...
Dear Bob, you did give me some hope. I thought that not knowing a
thing about programming was my problem, maybe being too stupid or
lazy to understand what should be clear to me. But I see that you are
indeed a software developer and still can have trouble with a programm.
I
Did you see my answer from November 20?
/Mats
Bob Kline wrote:
Bob Kline wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Have you read chapter 9 as well? If not, could you read that and let me
know if it helps? Once you do understand it, could you also propose an
addition to the docs to clear thi
I have already told you that this is a dead end.
The "current duration" is handled when LilyPond reads
through the input file, character by character. For example
if you have
somemusic = {c1 }
firstdefinition = { a }
someothermusic = {c2 }
seconddefinition = { g }
then \firstdefinition will alwa
On 12/22/06, Rick Hansen (aka RickH) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How can I code a grace note (actually that is really a grace rest) but also
make it completly invisible and take up no space, on a one-time/as-needed
basis?
I'd like to be able to change the "current duration" that lilypond has set
Bob Kline wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> Have you read chapter 9 as well? If not, could you read that and let me
>> know if it helps? Once you do understand it, could you also propose an
>> addition to the docs to clear this up?
>
> I will keep trying and report back results.
OK, I give
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But to get no cautionary key signature at the end of a line
(when the key signature changes on the following line),
I wasn't able to figure out how to accomplish that at the point
(some time ago) when I would have preferred to do without the
cautionary key-change indicat
Han-Wen Nienhuys lilypond.org> writes:
>
> Jonathan Henkelman escreveu:
> > --- Brett Duncan wrote:
> >
> >>> \tuplet 3:2 {c4 c8 c c4}
> >>>
> >>> should be printed as
> >>>
> >>> |- 3 |
> >>> __
> >>> | | | |
> >>> | | | |
> >>> X X X X
> >>>
> >>> or as
> >>>
>
"Rick Hansen (aka RickH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone on this list extended the \include lilypond command to also do
> simple token replacement as it is "including" the text? IOW like this:
>
> \include "myFile.ly" @myToken1=a; @myToken2=25; @myToken3="replace with
> this"
>
> Whereb
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
But to get no cautionary key signature at the end of a line
(when the key signature changes on the following line),
I wasn't able to figure out how to accomplish that at the point
(some time ago) when I would have preferred to do without the
cautionary key-change i
William Oram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been toying with two-pass vertical spacing. Pretty neat, and
> exactly what I need. A couple questions:
>
> 1) Is it *supposed* to force each system onto a separate page?
No. The purpose of two pass spacing is to have the same page breaks, but
with
Hello,
I'm a piano teacher, so I'd like to understand what's the meaning of all
the statements used in layout block of D.2.4 template. I'm going to
include it below, my questions are marked there.
\version "2.9.13"
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
I was afraid of this kind of answer, if define-music-function cant do
something as simple as replace one note on a \transpose without writing a
whole bunch of code... I'm not going to bother with it myself. Too much
complexity, I'd rather look for something that will let me stay on a
user-level,
I will be out of the office starting 12/22/2006 and will not return until
12/27/2006.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Eduardo Vieira-3 wrote:
>
> Citando "Rick Hansen (aka RickH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>>
>> If you have done this can you share it or sell it to me? (please dont
>> suggest m4, I gave up on that monster)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
> Hi, Rick! Yes, this preprocessor looks scary, as well as some adva
Citando "Rick Hansen (aka RickH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> If you have done this can you share it or sell it to me? (please dont
> suggest m4, I gave up on that monster)
>
> Thanks
>
Hi, Rick! Yes, this preprocessor looks scary, as well as some advanced
programming with Scheme. But once I got
Jonathan Henkelman escreveu:
> --- Brett Duncan wrote:
>
>>> \tuplet 3:2 {c4 c8 c c4}
>>>
>>> should be printed as
>>>
>>> |- 3 |
>>> __
>>> | | | |
>>> | | | |
>>> X X X X
>>>
>>> or as
>>>
>>> |- 3 -| |- 3 -|
>>>
>>> | |\ |\ |
>>> | | | |
>>> X X X
How can I code a grace note (actually that is really a grace rest) but also
make it completly invisible and take up no space, on a one-time/as-needed
basis?
I'd like to be able to change the "current duration" that lilypond has set
without actually having to introduce any music to the score tha
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 09:11:04AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lilypond desperately needs some king of built-in text pre-process (that
> installs with lilypond) to take care of these things, instead of everybody
> having to constantly re-write the core lilypond code to do such simple
> things
seb-g wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:48:24PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> The simple substitution example below should be pretty easy, but I'm "in
>> a
>> pickle", can someone show me how to replace the note name in the
>> transpose
>> statement with the note specified on the
Has anyone on this list extended the \include lilypond command to also do
simple token replacement as it is "including" the text? IOW like this:
\include "myFile.ly" @myToken1=a; @myToken2=25; @myToken3="replace with
this"
Whereby @myToken1, 2 and 3 above will be whole word searched and replace
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:48:24PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The simple substitution example below should be pretty easy, but I'm "in a
> pickle", can someone show me how to replace the note name in the transpose
> statement with the note specified on the function call (parameter called
I've been toying with two-pass vertical spacing. Pretty neat, and
exactly what I need. A couple questions:
1) Is it *supposed* to force each system onto a separate page? That
seems to be what it's doing: splitting pages with multiple systems. I'd
be OK with this, aside from the smaller systems fil
Anybody?
Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote:
>
> The simple substitution example below should be pretty easy, but I'm "in a
> pickle", can someone show me how to replace the note name in the transpose
> statement with the note specified on the function call (parameter called
> "root")?
>
> But it
--- Brett Duncan wrote:
> > \tuplet 3:2 {c4 c8 c c4}
> >
> > should be printed as
> >
> > |- 3 |
> > __
> > | | | |
> > | | | |
> > X X X X
> >
> > or as
> >
> > |- 3 -| |- 3 -|
> >
> > | |\ |\ |
> > | | | |
> > X X X X
If we are going to worry ab
Matevž Jekovec-2 wrote:
>
> Is there a predefined constant in Lily which shows the current date
> and/or system time.
>
> This would be useful for the footer tag for example, when was the
> document generated - this would mark the version of the score then, if
> you made any newer versions of
Dearest Lilyponders:
When I started with lilypond 2.6, I remember, there are two options in
the downloads page;
1. Install option.
2. Upgrade option.
I´m a Windows XP user, and is very hard to uninstall lilypond for the next
version. I like very much the experimental versions.
May be I´m do
Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This sounds like a good start. Does the translation so far only
> concern the webpage, or is there also some (of course now older)
> documentation translated?
Only a part of the website. That part needs to be checked using
make check-translation LANG
This sounds like a good start. Does the translation so far only concern
the webpage, or is there also some (of course now older) documentation
translated?
Well I will try to sort out my way on this...
Greetings
Till
Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Till,
a while ago I thought
Hello.
> Is there a predefined constant in Lily which shows the current date
> and/or system time.
>
today = #(strftime "%d-%m-%Y" (localtime (current-time)))
Best,
Gilles
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/ma
Is there a predefined constant in Lily which shows the current date
and/or system time.
This would be useful for the footer tag for example, when was the
document generated - this would mark the version of the score then, if
you made any newer versions of your document afterwards.
Regards.
- Mat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
> Since the duration would be the second of three arguments, it could not be
> optional, but that's not a problem.
>
> I think (?) this would have the side effect that \tuplet 3:2 2. would
> be the same as \tuplet 6:4 2. or \tuplet 9:6 2., which would mean
> that it wo
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:58, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I agree that the scores that take most time to type in are those that have
> repeated rhythms like
> \times 2/3 {c c c } c4 \times 2/3 {c c c } c4
> or
> c8 c16 c c4 c8 c16 c c4
> especially if these are combined with slurs. It is certain
44 matches
Mail list logo
