Arjan Bos wrote:
On 1 apr 2008, at 16:12, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Arjan Bos wrote:
Ah, I remember that thread. It is what gave me this idea in the
first place. The problem of centered dynamics crossing bar lines
does not apply to most of my music, which is polyphonic classical
guitar
Ahh - sorry. I didn't realise you wanted to move the accidental on a note
inside a chord. This is a lot trickier, as \tweak can't be used to move
accidentals, and \override moves all accidentals, as you say. Have a look
at left-padding and right-padding in Section 4.5.2 Fixing overlapping
We also use add9, add11, and occasionally add#4 and others. Are add
chords supported in Lilypond?
Sure.
\version 2.10.33
test = \chordmode { c1:3.5.9 c:3.5.11 c:7.11+ } % to use your example
\score {
\new ChordNames \test
\new Staff \test
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
}
Paul Scott wrote:
Arjan Bos wrote:
Ah, that makes more sense! However, to me the dynamics are part of
the whole piece of music and should be attached at Staff level, not at
Voice level. So that's why I put them in a separate Voice.
Musically, you are of course completely right in most
2008/4/3, Michael Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We also use add9, add11, and occasionally add#4 and others. Are add
chords supported in Lilypond?
Sure.
\version 2.10.33
test = \chordmode { c1:3.5.9 c:3.5.11 c:7.11+ } % to use your example
\score {
\new ChordNames \test
\new
2008/4/1, Till Rettig [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The bar line should go from the uppermost staff line to the downmost staff
line, but now it gets centered on the middle position, so if the upper or
lower half of the staff extends more than the other (from the middle
counted) the bar line is
LilyPond-ers
Grand Documentation Project
Graham and his helpers have now completed a large part of the GDP revision
of the first chapter of the Notation Reference (NR), most of the Learning
Manual (LM) is finished, and the Music Glossary (MG) has been greatly
extended. Pulling snippets from
2008/4/3, Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The next step is to revise the second chapter in the Notation Reference -
NR 2 Specialist notation. To kick off this process the new suggested
section headings can be found at
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.txt , and we now
need your
Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
Perhaps Accordion (and not Accordian) should go into Wind instruments?
No, because an accordion is not a wind instrument (see the definition of a
wind instrumen in wikipedia), but rather a keyboard instrument (sub-category
aerophones)...
Valentin Villenave wrote:
If we decide to add bowing indications in Strings, we should
consider adding Breathing indications to Wind instruments, shouldn't
we?
I've often seen breathing indications both in string music as well as vocal
music.
/Mats
Am Donnerstag, den 03.04.2008, 14:14 +0100 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
The next step is to revise the second chapter in the Notation Reference - NR
2 Specialist notation. To kick off this process the new suggested section
headings can be found at http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.txt ,
Valentin wrote:
Perhaps Accordion (and not Accordian) should go into Wind instruments?
Thanks - corrected.
and
If we decide to add bowing indications in Strings, we should
consider adding Breathing indications to Wind instruments, shouldn't
we?
Mats wrote:
I've often seen breathing
René Brandenburger wrote:
a topic which I think could be interisting is
2.7 Lyrics and repeats
Good idea. Added. I might come back to you for some
ideas for the text later :)
Trevor D
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:08:06 +0100
Torsten Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thank you for your kind reply and sorry for my late response. The
example you provided does indeed work nicely for monotonic voices.
However, it appears it does not work for chords
Please see LM 4.1.4 Tweaking
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:09:01 +0200
Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Valentin Villenave wrote:
If we decide to add bowing indications in Strings, we should
consider adding Breathing indications to Wind instruments,
shouldn't we?
I've often seen breathing indications both in
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:54:19 +0200
Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/4/3, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As you all know, I'm not at all fond of duplication in the docs,
but I'm having difficulty arguing that String music would be
easier to understand if we omitted
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Andrea Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Mar 2008, at 16:47, Graham Percival wrote:
Oh, I see. Well, you could create an invisible time signature of
1 / 14353, then create a note with r1*0.568292 -- I haven't
checked the math here, though.
Yeah,
Ciao Trevor,
I was in fact waiting for your reply...:)
I have suspended the experimentation for the moment, but as soon as I
can I'll test it.
Yes, I have floats.
Thanks
Best
-a-
Hi Andrea,
Warning: completely untested idea: but could you simply use
proportional notation with 4/4
Grand Documentation Project
The next step is to revise the second chapter in the Notation Reference
- NR
2 Specialist notation. To kick off this process the new suggested
section
headings can be found at http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.txt ,
and we
now need your comments on these
2008/4/3, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And bowing, for string players?
Bowing may be added to scores like other articulations; for more
information, see @ref{articulations and ornamentations}. The
exact names of bowings are described in @ref{List of articulations}.
?
Once a
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:40:34 +0200
Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/4/3, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
c2\upbow
c2\downbow
Seems consistent to me... Do you mean you don't like this sentence?
\upbow is listed in Appendix B.something. How to use
articulations is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
And bowing, for string players?
Bowing may be added to scores like other articulations; for more
information, see @ref{articulations and ornamentations}. The
exact names of bowings are
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings everybody,
A new issue of the LilyPond Report is out:
http://valentin.villenave.info/spip.php?article61
This week, we are going to come back on a few points that were raised
on the last issue, to
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm just about to start work on creating snippets for each of the
\markup commands listed in appendix B.6.
Excellent! Embedded examples will be *extremely* useful ...
Before I begin, I'd like to
Ah! Then I'm sorry it took me so long to reply to the thread. I've been
travelling (of course ...) and so not very disciplined about keeping up with
the list.
When you have time to go back to the piece, reply back with whatever results
you're getting to the thread. I'm curious to see what you
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings everybody,
A new issue of the LilyPond Report is out:
http://valentin.villenave.info/spip.php?article61
This week, we are
Hi David,
On 02/04/2008, David Fedoruk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
In general I prefer the first option. However, may I propose a compromise?
I always find examples *in context* the most valuable. That said, it
is sometimes difficult to tell where the example command illustrated
Hi Trevor,
On 03/04/2008, Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first thought was stuff is, in general, almost always better with an
actual score example. But, clicking back through B.6 and rereading, I think
exactly the opposite conclusion is warranted here. I think the
Hi,
In the following code I cannot solve two problems:
-
\version 2.11.42
{ \voiceTwo
d'8
\acciaccatura {\once \override Stem #'direction = #up c'8} d'8
\acciaccatura {\once \override Stem #'direction = #up c'8} d'8-.
}
\layout {
ragged-last = ##t
}
-
1) the first
Is it possible to produce a horizontal bracket over a single note? (currently on
v. 2.10.33)
I've tried playing with OttavaBracket and TextSpanner.
TextSpanner doesn't work for a single note:
{
c4\startTextSpan\stopTextSpan
}
I can't get the left edge for the ottava bracket to work. I want
In NR 1.3.3.2, could we change the second snippet to read
\arpeggioBracket
c e g c\arpeggio
\arpeggioNeutral
c e g c\arpeggio
to clarify the method of canceling the arpeggioBracket? (I had to dig
through property-init.ly to convince myself that this was the correct
way of doing it.)
Also,
Try putting the textspanners into a separate voice with spacer notes.
IIRC a textspanner needs to start on a 'real' note, so your
textspanner voice would need transparent noteheads and stems.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to produce a horizontal
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Hawryluk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In NR 1.3.3.2, could we change the second snippet to read
\arpeggioBracket
c e g c\arpeggio
\arpeggioNeutral
c e g c\arpeggio
to clarify the method of canceling the arpeggioBracket? (I had to dig
33 matches
Mail list logo
