Re: Lyrics placement

2012-10-29 Thread Trevor Daniels
Guy Stalnaker wrote Monday, October 29, 2012 2:37 AM Hello everyone -- my first question to this list. Hi, welcome! I have looked over the Learning Guide and the Notation Reference for help in telling Lilypond to put S1 lyrics above the staff. Yet I'm stymied by differences in

Re: Reheaseals with irregular bars

2012-10-29 Thread Wim van Dommelen
Hi Jacques, I'm not going to answer all your questions, that is just too much. One advise: cut things in pieces and look for smaller problems. There is a LP problem in the bar numbers in this case (which I really should register as a bug, it increases the measure numbers twice for some

Re: Reheaseals with irregular bars

2012-10-29 Thread Jacques Menu TvTMail
Hello Wim, Thanks for this fast and detailed answer, it is much appreciated! I'll put your suggestions in practise. As for the current numbering error, I can circumvent it temporarily by forcing the expected numbers explicitly. A nice day! Regards, PS Is there some site where I could

Re: Reheaseals with irregular bars

2012-10-29 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
On 2012-10-28 21:35, Jacques Menu wrote: Hello folks, I've been using Lilypond for some time, but Beethoven's Trio X für Klavier, Flöte und Fagott causes me much trouble : \partial is not usable inside a part, and Thema andante con variazioni contains tricky rehearsals, like: After fighting

Re: Reheaseals with irregular bars

2012-10-29 Thread David Kastrup
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at writes: On 2012-10-28 21:35, Jacques Menu wrote: Hello folks, I've been using Lilypond for some time, but Beethoven's Trio X für Klavier, Flöte und Fagott causes me much trouble : \partial is not usable inside a part, and Thema andante con

Re: Reheaseals with irregular bars

2012-10-29 Thread Wim van Dommelen
Hi Jacques, There is the Mutopia project, but I'm unsure about the current status. I've seen no activity on the mailing list for a long time. And for my last project, which I registered on Mutopia, I even didn't get a confirmation at all. So I also never submitted the result :-( Does

Re: Reheaseals with irregular bars

2012-10-29 Thread Rutger Hofman
On 10/29/2012 01:29 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: Hi Jacques, There is the Mutopia project, but I'm unsure about the current status. I've seen no activity on the mailing list for a long time. And for my last project, which I registered on Mutopia, I even didn't get a confirmation at all. So I

RE: dynamics positioning

2012-10-29 Thread Daniel Rosen
Try using two Dynamics contexts, one above and one below. DR -Original Message- From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:m...@peterodoherty.net] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:14 AM To: lilypond-user Subject: dynamics positioning Hi, Could someone please take a look at the attached file and

RE: dynamics positioning

2012-10-29 Thread Daniel Rosen
Can't really tell from the attachment. As a rule, tiny excerpts of code (which other users can compile themselves) are more useful for debugging than PDFs. Check out: http://www.lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html DR From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:m...@peterodoherty.net] Sent: Monday, October 29,

Re: dynamics positioning

2012-10-29 Thread Peter O'Doherty
Sorry for the oversight. The attached code is as minimal as I can get it. Thanks, Peter On 10/29/2012 02:48 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote: Can't really tell from the attachment. As a rule, tiny excerpts of code (which other users can compile themselves) are more useful for debugging than PDFs. Check

RE: dynamics positioning

2012-10-29 Thread Daniel Rosen
Well, first of all, in the future, you can just paste code right into the body of your email, like I'm about to do--no need for an attachment. :-) And second, I would dispute that you couldn't get it smaller--like the page I referenced says, very few tiny examples are longer than about 10 lines

RE: dynamics positioning

2012-10-29 Thread Eluze
Daniel Rosen wrote Unfortunately, while this corrects the horizontal alignment of the grobs within the Dynamics context, they now collide with the beams, so the vertical spacing needs to be adjusted. I'm not sure how to do that without having to adjust 'Y-offset for each individual

RE: Modified laissez vibrer ties

2012-10-29 Thread Daniel Rosen
Never mind--I found the solution: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=794 I only just discovered the LSR, so I completely forgot to check there before bothering everyone here. Oops. :-P DR -Original Message- From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, October

Re: Lilypond on the cloud

2012-10-29 Thread Mike Blackstock
Hi Francois. Its been moved to http://www.omet.ca; use that address if you want to use the Facebook login. It has an editor with syntax highlighting and line numbering (CodeMirror, using the default Latext stylesheet), it also has convert-ly, and this week I'm adding midi2ly and musicxml2ly for

Re: What is the oldest convert-ly available?

2012-10-29 Thread Mike Blackstock
Thanks guys. It's for an online lilypond site so users can convert older mutopia files. So it's no a real pressing issue for me, just a 'nice to have' feature if people wanted to could go back and upgrade old mutopia stuff. Cheers, Mike On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Thomas Morley

exact dimenions of pdf/png

2012-10-29 Thread Peter Van Kranenburg
Dear all, I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher: 1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system. This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels. I followed the directions from the 'usage' manual, and I put this on top of my source file. \paper{ indent=0\mm

Re: exact dimenions of pdf/png

2012-10-29 Thread David Kastrup
Peter Van Kranenburg peter.van.kranenb...@meertens.knaw.nl writes: Dear all, I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher: 1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system. This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels. I followed the directions from the 'usage' manual,

Re: exact dimenions of pdf/png

2012-10-29 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Peter Van Kranenburg peter.van.kranenb...@meertens.knaw.nl writes: Dear all, I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher: 1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system. This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels. I followed the

Re: dynamics positioning

2012-10-29 Thread m...@mikesolomon.org
On 29 oct. 2012, at 15:13, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com wrote: Well, first of all, in the future, you can just paste code right into the body of your email, like I'm about to do--no need for an attachment. :-) And second, I would dispute that you couldn't get it smaller--like the page I

Re: Lyrics placement

2012-10-29 Thread Guy Stalnaker
Thanks Trevor -- I had to completely rework how the score was described and, and you said, jettison /addlyrics. The template will be different now, but the lyrics are indeed above the staff where I want them to be. The issue was with using in a nested way to get SopranoOne and SopranoTwo

Re: Staff spacing for Z beam

2012-10-29 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 26.10.2012 12:31, schrieb Phil Holmes: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=375 Beam damping doesn't work for cross-staff beams. But I could successfully control the beam positions manually (http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=97). Regards Helge

DevNull produces strange output

2012-10-29 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi, accidently I noticed that DevNull produces some weird output, if its argument contains an override to TabStaff, VaticanaStaff or RhythmicStaff (this list may be not complete) \version 2.17.4 mus = { \override TabStaff.TabNoteHead #'color = #red % same with: %

Re: DevNull produces strange output

2012-10-29 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/10/29 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: Hi, accidently I noticed that DevNull produces some weird output, if its argument contains an override to TabStaff, VaticanaStaff or RhythmicStaff (this list may be not complete) \version 2.17.4

Re: enlarge vertical distance in time signature

2012-10-29 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/10/29 Stefan Thomas kontrapunktste...@gmail.com: [...] The problem is: I would like to have a score with drumstaff and a normal staff. And only in the normal Staff shall be a wider time signature. I give you an short example: [...] Hi Stefan, next try: I defined `customTime´ containing

Re: pitch name transpose into numeric per key signature

2012-10-29 Thread Gilles
Le Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:16:34 +0100, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com a écrit: (let* ... (scalestep (modulo (- (ly:pitch-notename pitch) (...base of key signature...)) 7)) (name (format #f ~a~a (string-ref 1234567 (scalestep))... If i well understand what you want, there is a snippet very

Lyrics Vertical Alignment

2012-10-29 Thread Tiresia GIUNO
Hi, is there any reason why Lyrics on the two staves in the attached example is not correctly vertical aligned? Thanks for your help! TGattachment: lyrics.png%{ lyrics %} \version 2.16.0 \include english.ly firstMusic = \relative c'' { \time 3/2 g1. | f4. g8 a4 g2 fs4 | g1. } firstWords =

Re: Lyrics Vertical Alignment

2012-10-29 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/10/30 Tiresia GIUNO tires...@googlemail.com: Hi, is there any reason why Lyrics on the two staves in the attached example is not correctly vertical aligned? No idea. But you could use: secondWords = \lyricmode { Ho -- | \skip1 di -- | e } HTH, Harm

Re: Lyrics Vertical Alignment

2012-10-29 Thread Tiresia GIUNO
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:02:09 +0100 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote: 2012/10/30 Tiresia GIUNO tires...@googlemail.com: Hi, is there any reason why Lyrics on the two staves in the attached example is not correctly vertical aligned? No idea. But you could use:

Re: Lyrics Vertical Alignment

2012-10-29 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
On 2012-10-30 00:46, Tiresia GIUNO wrote: is there any reason why Lyrics on the two staves in the attached example is not correctly vertical aligned? Yes, there is a reason. See e.g. Elaine Gould: Behind Bars -- The Definitive Guide to Music Notation (published by Faber Music, 2011), p.439,

Re: Is it possible to change beaming from the \layout block?

2012-10-29 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
On 2012-10-30 02:12, Vaughan McAlley wrote: This code compiles without complaint, but the beams are still in groups of four. What am I doing wrong? Nothing. The \time 4/4 command implicitly sets all the timing properties, so your global values are overwritten and don't have any effect.

Re: Is it possible to change beaming from the \layout block?

2012-10-29 Thread Nick Payne
On 30/10/12 12:12, Vaughan McAlley wrote: \version 2.16.0 myNotes = \relative c' { \time 4/4 d8 d d d d d d d } \score { \new Staff = RH \context Staff \new Voice { \myNotes } \layout { \context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext % in case this is

Re: Is it possible to change beaming from the \layout block?

2012-10-29 Thread Vaughan McAlley
On 30 October 2012 13:09, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote: \new Voice { \set beamExceptions = #'((end . (((1 . 8) . (2 2 2 2) \myNotes } Is there any alternative to setting \beamExceptions explicitly in every voice? That’s what I’m looking for...

Re: pitch name transpose into numeric per key signature

2012-10-29 Thread MING TSANG
Gilles: Thank you for your solution concerning \numbr.  It is great and is what I am looking for. I have been using Ez_numbers_engraver for sometime now.  It is great to display numeric of pitch name per key signature inside notehead.  One draw back is that the notehead need to be large for

Re: Is it possible to change beaming from the \layout block?

2012-10-29 Thread Nick Payne
On 30/10/12 13:36, Vaughan McAlley wrote: On 30 October 2012 13:09, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote: \new Voice { \set beamExceptions = #'((end . (((1 . 8) . (2 2 2 2) \myNotes } Is there any alternative to setting \beamExceptions explicitly in

Re: enlarge vertical distance in time signature

2012-10-29 Thread pabuhr
I consider it much nicer to make strg of type fraction?, and then num can be (car strg) and denom can be (cdr strg). and can just be \spreadTimeSignature #8 2/4 ... which is nicer on the eyes. I was intrigued and tried to modify the code as you suggested as a learning exercise. But I

Re: enlarge vertical distance in time signature

2012-10-29 Thread David Kastrup
pabuhr pab...@fastmail.fm writes: I consider it much nicer to make strg of type fraction?, and then num can be (car strg) and denom can be (cdr strg). and can just be \spreadTimeSignature #8 2/4 ... which is nicer on the eyes. I was intrigued and tried to modify the code as you