Hi.
When it comes to create slur over repeat (volta), I use this trick:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes#modifying-ties-and-slurs
(see: Specifying control points explicitly)
But when slur is created just before line break, it appears also in the next
Hi,
this post
http://www.sibeliusblog.com/tips/constrain-attachment-points-in-sibelius-and-finale/
lets me think if such a visualization might not be a good thing to have
in Frescobaldi's Layout Control Options (and as a snippet in the
openLilyLib repository).
What this would mean is:
- draw
OK, so I've tried:
\alterBroken transparent #'(#f #t) Slur
and it works quite well. The only problem is that transparent object is still
there, therefore takes space. Better solution would be:
\alterBroken stencil #'(#t #f) Slur
But It doesn't work...
Hi Karol,
2014-05-03 14:15 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Hi.
When it comes to create slur over repeat (volta), I use this trick:
hmm, your example shows no repeat ...
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes#modifying-ties-and-slurs
(see:
Thanks Harm!
\omitLastBrokenSlur is what I need! Anathoer useful command to my collection :-)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2014-05-03 16:57 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Thanks Harm!
\omitLastBrokenSlur is what I need! Anathoer useful command to my collection
:-)
Seems I always forget about alterBroken ...
You can make it work with:
#(define get-stil
(lambda (grob)
(let* ((function (assoc-get
For all who have read the Scheme tutorials
http://lilypondblog.org/category/using-lilypond/advanced/scheme-tutorials/
but aren't notified about comments: I have just uploaded a new solution
to the task, incorporating and putting together all information and
suggestions from several people's
On Sat, 3 May 2014, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
I have an edition of Robert Schumann's Album für die Jugend that has some
pictures of his handwritten scores inside. One of the pictures shows a small
but apparently unapproved pianopiece, before the first tune Melodie starts.
The tune is
(LilyPond version 2.18.2)
This snippet:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=10
...work as advertized and produces two fermatas over the last bar line.
The only problem is what it emits these warnings:
document.ly:22:7: warning: Two simultaneous mark events, junking this one
\mark \markup {
On 03.05.2014 21:54, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sat, 3 May 2014, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
There is just one important thing that I couldn't read in Schumann's
handwriting. It's overstroken by Schumann and in that typical 19th
century German handwriting. But maybe someone in this group is
Harm, and what if I don't want to rotate my note head along with stem-dir? How
to modify your code then? Some note heads look beeter when they are not being
rotated.
If you only want noteheads of doThin-type, try:
\version 2.18.0
#(define nhg
(lambda (grob)
(let* ((stil
Hi Knute,
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com wrote:
(LilyPond version 2.18.2)
This snippet:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=10
...work as advertized and produces two fermatas over the last bar line.
The only problem is what it emits these warnings:
Am 03.05.2014 22:20, schrieb Malte Meyn:
On 03.05.2014 21:54, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sat, 3 May 2014, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
There is just one important thing that I couldn't read in Schumann's
handwriting. It's overstroken by Schumann and in that typical 19th
century German
OK, I made it. I think I begin to understand scheme :-)
#(define nhg
(lambda
(grob)
(let*
((stil
(ly:note-head::print grob))
(dur-log
(ly:grob-property grob 'duration-log))
(nh-id-nr
(if
(= dur-log 2) 2 1))
Hi,
On 2/5/14 12:47 AM, Robin Bannister wrote:
Thomas Ruedas wrote:
the second a fatal error,
I guess that is due to compatibility issues,
because the hacks seem to be several years old
But the thumbBracket code still works; see the recent
Wow, that's a lot of code just to get one upside-down fermata! But thanks.
That's going to do it. And I bet it will be useful in the future.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:38 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Knute,
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:03 PM,
On Sat, 3 May 2014, Urs Liska wrote:
There is just one important thing that I couldn't read in Schumann's
handwriting. It's overstroken by Schumann and in that typical 19th
century German handwriting. But maybe someone in this group is able
to
read it. See
2014-05-04 1:38 GMT+02:00 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
On Sat, 3 May 2014, Urs Liska wrote:
There is just one important thing that I couldn't read in
Schumann's
handwriting. It's overstroken by Schumann and in that typical 19th
century German handwriting. But
Am 04.05.2014 01:49, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
2014-05-04 1:38 GMT+02:00 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
On Sat, 3 May 2014, Urs Liska wrote:
There is just one important thing that I couldn't read in
Schumann's
handwriting. It's overstroken by Schumann and in that
See
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMcrb-sKh5wfeature=youtube_gdata_player
Regards,
Mogens
On 2014-05-03, at 17:26, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Am 04.05.2014 01:49, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
2014-05-04 1:38 GMT+02:00 Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
On Sat, 3
20 matches
Mail list logo
