Not sure if this helps you, too, but it seems your example might could
benefit from the following:
\override Staff.OttavaBracket.whiteout = ##t
\override Staff.OttavaBracket.layer = #10
Just guessing, though. So my revision of your snippet now looks like this:
\version "2.19.20"
treble = \relat
Oh, and get rid of the
\override Beam.outside-staff-priority = #1000
unless you mean for there to be a space between the stems and beam. This is
unnecessary with the OttavaBracket override working properly.
- Abraham
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Andrew Bernard [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069
Andrew,
You just haven't designated the correct context for the OttavaBracket.
Since they are created/managed in the Staff context, it should be
\override Staff.OttavaBracket.extra-offset = #...
- Abraham
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Andrew Bernard [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n176764..
Luca and David
Luca
>could you post a snippet? I'd be very interested in see the code...
>Thank you in advance,
I posted it on
http://mglessons.com/lilypond/
at the top and bottom with pdf and ly
David
>It is, but why you can't use \shape is not clear. The functionality is the
>same--displa
How can the ottava bracket in this snippet be moved downwards? I have been able
to get it under the beam, but now the stems seem to be in the way. Using
extra-offset and Y-offset appears to have no effect on the position. The result
we are seeking is to have the ottawa bracket under the tall bea
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Kieren MacMillan [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n176742...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul (et al.),
>
> > a more elegant approach would be to trace the outline of the stencil,
> but that’s beyond my skills
>
> Maybe someone out there can take up the challenge?
On 5/18/15 1:59 AM, "Wilbert Berendsen" wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>
>this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
>objects changes, influencing the spacing. But that's probably easy to
>fix.
It should be very easy to fix. Just get the extents of the original
stencil, and apply them t
On 5/18/15 12:49 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>At any rate, there should probably be a user-specifiable way to change all
>three values that govern the performance, whether by context properties or
>by arguments.
As I think about it some more, perhaps the most logically-consistent set
of three
On 5/18/15 12:04 PM, "Paul Morris" wrote:
>> On May 17, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> This is a nice implementation -- I didn't think it could be done!
>
>Thanks Carl!
>
>> I think
>> it should be made part of LilyPond, if the performance hit is not too
>>big.
>> It seems to crea
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:14 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
>
>> > On May 18, 2015, at 3:59 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
>> >
>> > this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
>> > objects changes, influencing the
Hi Paul,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
> > On May 18, 2015, at 3:59 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> >
> > this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
> > objects changes, influencing the spacing. But that's probably easy to
> > fix.
>
> Thanks! Yes I n
> On May 18, 2015, at 3:59 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
>
> this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
> objects changes, influencing the spacing. But that's probably easy to
> fix.
Thanks! Yes I noticed that horizontal spacing is increased since the stencil
is wider (but
> On May 17, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> This is a nice implementation -- I didn't think it could be done!
Thanks Carl!
> I think
> it should be made part of LilyPond, if the performance hit is not too big.
> It seems to create a lot of stencils, but maybe that is no problem.
LilyPond users may want to consider joining this Facebook group so that
LilyPond is better represented therein. I recently posted "Are there any
serious LilyPond users here?" in the group and no one said "yes". Here is
a poll that is currently being discussed in the group. Sadly I am just a
Lily
Il 18/05/2015 16:42, Stephen MacNeil ha scritto:
[...] I couldn't get minimum-length to do anything, however I was able
to solve the problem using a modified version of shapeSlur (is that
the predecessor of shape?) in conjunction with other things,
Dear Stephen,
could you post a snippet? I'd
Hi Paul (et al.),
> I took Kieren up on his offer to sponsor a better whiteout stencil function.
> It’s attached so that anyone can make use of it.
Thanks for doing this! Looking forward to seeing it in action “in the wild”.
If anyone is willing to co-sponsor this function with me, please conta
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Stephen MacNeil
wrote:
> Luca
> Thanks for the help. I couldn't get minimum-length to do anything, however
> I was able to solve the problem using a modified version of shapeSlur (is
> that the predecessor of shape?) in conjunction with other things,
>
>
It is, bu
Luca
Thanks for the help. I couldn't get minimum-length to do anything, however
I was able to solve the problem using a modified version of shapeSlur (is
that the predecessor of shape?) in conjunction with other things,
Stephen
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Stephen MacNeil
wrote:
> Thanks L
Hi,
See also: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=357
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-05-17 20:30 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kobel :
> On 05/17/2015 08:04 PM, Marco wrote:
>
>> How is possible to center perfectly dynamics symbols between the staves
>> of a
>> piano staff?
>>
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> see https://code.goog
Hi Paul,
this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
objects changes, influencing the spacing. But that's probably easy to
fix.
--
Wilbert Berendsen
(http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gn
20 matches
Mail list logo
