Re: Style questions

2017-03-28 18:16 GMT+03:00 David Wright : > because it doesn't handle whole-measure rests...or does it now? No, it doesn't, indeed. > I have come across this reference, which claims to handle them, > but I have yet to try it out: > >

Re: Style questions

2017-03-28 18:16 GMT+03:00 David Wright : >> Having abovementioned LSR snippet: here in Ukraine quarter rests in >> the first measure should be merged, but in the second one upper voice >> hsould be notated as r4 r e g and two quarter rests should not be >> merged. > >

Re: [ANN] LilyQuick 0.92beta

Hi, Vaughan! On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Vaughan McAlley [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n201694...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > I’m happy to announce LilyQuick 0.92beta. The main feature is > (hopefully) simpler installation with (hopefully) clearer > documentation. As well,

[ANN] LilyQuick 0.92beta

Greetings, I’m happy to announce LilyQuick 0.92beta. The main feature is (hopefully) simpler installation with (hopefully) clearer documentation. As well, LilyQuick can now automatically quit Qsynth when it quits. Enjoy! https://github.com/palestrina/lily-q Vaughan Here is the README file:

Re:

Point taken. I actually had read it a while back, which is how I came to know about bar checks, but missed that part. I'll reread it... On Mar 27, 2017 3:28 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote: > Others have pointed out the problem to you, but you would have found it > yourself by

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaves don't work as I would to

Instead that has worked. Thanks (my fault). -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/RemoveEmptyStaves-don-t-work-as-I-would-to-tp201683p201691.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaves don't work as I would to

Hi, > Thanks for the lesson (maybe I'll be able to understand it), but still it > doesn't work… Below is your original snippet, with the suggested fix. It doesn’t work for you as you expect? (It certainly does for me.) Kieren. \version "2.19.26" \layout { \context { \Score skipBars =

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaves don't work as I would to

Thanks for the lesson (maybe I'll be able to understand it), but still it doesn't work... -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/RemoveEmptyStaves-don-t-work-as-I-would-to-tp201683p201689.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaves don't work as I would to

I've installed the latest version, but no changes :-( -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/RemoveEmptyStaves-don-t-work-as-I-would-to-tp201683p201687.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaves don't work as I would to

Hi Son, about minimal examples, see my comments below. ;) 2017-03-28 21:48 GMT+02:00 Son_V : > neither \\RemoveAllEmptyStaves .. > > This is my try for a Minimum example, sorry if I failed to make it smaller: > > \version "2.19.26" > \layout { > \context { >

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaves don't work as I would to

Son_V writes: > neither \\RemoveAllEmptyStaves .. > > This is my try for a Minimum example, sorry if I failed to make it smaller: > > \version "2.19.26" > \layout { > \context { > \Score > skipBars = ##t > %\RemoveEmptyStaves > } > } \RemoveEmptyStaves

Re: \RemoveEmptyStaves don't work as I would to

Hi, > neither \\RemoveAllEmptyStaves .. In 2.19.56, that (with a single \ of course) works as expected for me. Maybe upgrade? Hope this helps, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info

\RemoveEmptyStaves don't work as I would to

neither \\RemoveAllEmptyStaves .. This is my try for a Minimum example, sorry if I failed to make it smaller: \version "2.19.26" \layout { \context { \Score skipBars = ##t %\RemoveEmptyStaves } } PartPOneVoiceOne = \relative g' { \clef "treble" \key c \major

Re: Rootless slash chords, 2017 edition

2017-03-28 0:39 GMT+02:00 Dmitry : > Hi, > > There's been a long standing feature request: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3909/ > > #3909 a feature to disable the chord root name printing - just print > the slash and inversion > > Over the years, it has

Re: Style questions

Am 28.03.2017 um 11:09 schrieb Menu Jacques: - should there be only one set of quarter rests under (CT.) in the lower staff, and if so, how can that be done (i.e. to « mask » a rest in a voice if there’s already one at the same point in another voice in the same staff)? Finale does so; -

Re: Style questions

On Tue 28 Mar 2017 at 12:16:41 (+0300), Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: > Regarding the first question: Lilypond can merge rests "automagically" > --- http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336 --- but it may depend on > local rules. I've used this snippet for a while now, together with mmrest = { \once

Re: Style questions

Hello Dmytro, Thanks, that will help me a lot too! JM > Le 28 mars 2017 à 16:03, Dmytro O. Redchuk a écrit : > > 2017-03-28 16:50 GMT+03:00 Guy Stalnaker : >> Oh, my! This is brilliant! I write mostly choral music and this will be >> invaluable!

Re: Style questions

2017-03-28 16:50 GMT+03:00 Guy Stalnaker : > Oh, my! This is brilliant! I write mostly choral music and this will be > invaluable! Much thanks. Well, when you need two rests to remain separated, you can put in either voice before that rest: \once \override

Re: Style questions

Oh, my! This is brilliant! I write mostly choral music and this will be invaluable! Much thanks. Guy Guy Stalnaker jimmyg...@gmail.com On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: > Regarding the first question: Lilypond can merge rests "automagically" >

Re: Detecting polyphony from stencil-override

Urs Liska writes: > Am 28.03.2017 um 14:56 schrieb David Kastrup: > >> You may try looking at the grob-property-data of 'direction which >> will be a direction when there is a direction override in progress >> (pointing to a multi-voice situation) and usually some sort of

Re: Detecting polyphony from stencil-override

Am 28.03.2017 um 14:56 schrieb David Kastrup: > Urs Liska writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> (how) is it possible to determine (from within a stencil override >> callback) if at any given point there is more than one active voice? >> I've asked a similar question before but

Re: Detecting polyphony from stencil-override

Urs Liska writes: > Hi all, > > (how) is it possible to determine (from within a stencil override > callback) if at any given point there is more than one active voice? > I've asked a similar question before but probably from the wrong > perspective. > > I'm overriding a

Detecting polyphony from stencil-override

Hi all, (how) is it possible to determine (from within a stencil override callback) if at any given point there is more than one active voice? I've asked a similar question before but probably from the wrong perspective. I'm overriding a stencil have to make a decision depending on the situation

Re: Style questions

Regarding the first question: Lilypond can merge rests "automagically" --- http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336 --- but it may depend on local rules. Having abovementioned LSR snippet: here in Ukraine quarter rests in the first measure should be merged, but in the second one upper voice hsould

Style questions

Hello folks, Two questions about the display style for Recordare's Binchois20.xml file: - should there be only one set of quarter rests under (CT.) in the lower staff, and if so, how can that be done (i.e. to « mask » a rest in a voice if there’s already one at the same point in

Access a script attached to a note head

Hi all, I don't find a way to determine if a given note head has a script attached to it. Neither the grob-object nor the parent note column seem to have this information. Is it necessary to go back to the music that caused the notehead to get to attached scripts? Thanks Urs --