Re: Bruhns "big" e-minor prelude

On 30.03.2018 01:21, Karlin High wrote: On 3/29/2018 3:16 PM, Ali Cuota wrote: in IMSLP the big e-minor prelude from Nikolaus Bruhns exists in pdf, with a reference to Mutopiaproject. In Mutopia, Bruhns ist not (anymore) in the composers list. I would be happy to have the source file if

Re: Bruhns "big" e-minor prelude

Hi Francois, I'd be happy to engrave this if you like. Or perhaps you want to do it yourself? Let me know. Andrew On 30 March 2018 at 07:16, Ali Cuota wrote: > Hello to everybody with a question: > > in IMSLP the big e-minor prelude from Nikolaus Bruhns exists in pdf,

Re: Bruhns "big" e-minor prelude

On 3/29/2018 3:16 PM, Ali Cuota wrote: in IMSLP the big e-minor prelude from Nikolaus Bruhns exists in pdf, with a reference to Mutopiaproject. In Mutopia, Bruhns ist not (anymore) in the composers list. I would be happy to have the source file if possible. Archive.org is an amazing

Re: Bruhns "big" e-minor prelude

Sorry, I was wrong! I let myself fool by the Donald E. Knuth's Computer Modern Fonts... Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Bruhns "big" e-minor prelude

Hi François, I've had a look at the PDF file and I can assure you that there is no LilyPond source file, simply because this PDF has not been produced by LilyPond. It's MusiXTeX. All the best, Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Bruhns "big" e-minor prelude

On 29.03.2018 22:16, Ali Cuota wrote: Hello to everybody with a question: in IMSLP the big e-minor prelude from Nikolaus Bruhns exists in pdf, with a reference to Mutopiaproject. In Mutopia, Bruhns ist not (anymore) in the composers list. Does the maintainer of this file read here? I would be

Bruhns "big" e-minor prelude

Hello to everybody with a question: in IMSLP the big e-minor prelude from Nikolaus Bruhns exists in pdf, with a reference to Mutopiaproject. In Mutopia, Bruhns ist not (anymore) in the composers list. Does the maintainer of this file reads here? I would be happy to have the source file if

Re: get current bar number

That worked perfectly! Thanks to all for responding. On 25 March 2018 at 19:46, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2018-03-25 0:04 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry : > > Hi Jan/Wols, > > > > Thank you for responding. I have tinkered with \applyContext and > > cannot get

Re: double slur collisions

Sorry, I just saw there is already a discussion in another thread. I should look at all the threads before posting... oh well. 2018-03-29 13:09 GMT-03:00 Stefano Troncaro : > Hi Kieren, > > I assume it is a bug? Since with more spacing there is no collision at > least

Re: double slur collisions

Hi Kieren, I assume it is a bug? Since with more spacing there is no collision at least with the starting note of the Slur: > \version "2.19.80" > stuff = { > 16 8 > 16 16 > 16

Re: Printing lower continuo figures only

On 2018-03-29 16:31, Brent Annable wrote: Hi all, I am currently reproducing a continuo part, and am having trouble achieving a particular effect: printing a continuo figure in the *lower *position only. So in the first example in the attached image, I want the '3' to appear on the lower

Printing lower continuo figures only

Hi all, I am currently reproducing a continuo part, and am having trouble achieving a particular effect: printing a continuo figure in the *lower *position only. So in the first example in the attached image, I want the '3' to appear on the lower line, at the same height as the '4' to the left of

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

On 2018-03-29 13:33, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Mats, Just use the new features of version 2.19: I tried that (see a previous post on this thread), but there are collisions (see a separate "bug?" thread). Did you not find that the slurs collide with the noteheads on your machine? Right,

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

Hi Mats, > Just use the new features of version 2.19: I tried that (see a previous post on this thread), but there are collisions (see a separate "bug?" thread). Did you not find that the slurs collide with the noteheads on your machine? Cheers, Kieren.

Re: Cross-staff stems

Many thanks to Andrew, Thomas and Phil! @Andrew: you're right... the typography itself is tricky, and maybe not very "official" (that's a Boosey edition); but clear: the RH must play the accompagnement notes from the LH. I chose Phil's solution... But I keep that of Andrew ... you never can tell

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

Sorry, I was too quick! See corrected version below. On 2018-03-29 09:24, Mats Bengtsson wrote: On 2018-03-29 00:39, Lucas Werkmeister wrote: Hi everyone! In a composition I’m transcribing, there are double slurs between some notes (see attached image, also uploaded at [1]), and the

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

On 2018-03-29 00:39, Lucas Werkmeister wrote: Hi everyone! In a composition I’m transcribing, there are double slurs between some notes (see attached image, also uploaded at [1]), and the lower slurs are right next to the note heads, inside the beams – whereas when typeset by LilyPond,