Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable?

2018-11-24 Thread Andrew Bernard
My apologies - I read this as referring to the 'documentation' meaning the HTML files, viewable with Frescobaldi or a browser. I failed to see that this was referring to PDF, and even read the comment that 'I downloaded the PDF' as meaning that was the solution! How wrong can I be? I can confirm

Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable?

2018-11-24 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-11-24 3:23 pm, Michael Gerdau wrote: Are you sure you are looking at the 2.19.82 version? I would be *very* surprised to find a PDF viewer that can magically summon fonts from the aether, because they are very much not there. I‘m quite certain that I’ve been looking at 2.19.82...

Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable?

2018-11-24 Thread J Martin Rushton
On 24/11/18 23:23, Michael Gerdau wrote: > >> Are you sure you are looking at the 2.19.82 version?  I would be >> *very* surprised to find a PDF viewer that can magically summon fonts >> from the aether, because they are very much not there. > > I‘m quite certain that I’ve been looking at

Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable?

2018-11-24 Thread Michael Gerdau
> Are you sure you are looking at the 2.19.82 version? I would be *very* > surprised to find a PDF viewer that can magically summon fonts from the > aether, because they are very much not there. I‘m quite certain that I’ve been looking at 2.19.82... >

Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable?

2018-11-24 Thread J Martin Rushton
On 24/11/18 22:17, Aaron Hill wrote: > On 2018-11-24 7:03 am, Michael Gerdau wrote: I am curious then as to why it all works fine for me and presumably others? Sounds like a Mac font problem to me, given my other current experience with Alegreya, as initially raised by Kieren.

Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable?

2018-11-24 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-11-24 7:03 am, Michael Gerdau wrote: I am curious then as to why it all works fine for me and presumably others? Sounds like a Mac font problem to me, given my other current experience with Alegreya, as initially raised by Kieren. Or has 2.19.82 been rebuilt since I downloaded it some

Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable?

2018-11-24 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-11-24 2:17 pm, Aaron Hill wrote: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation.pdf Also... md5sum notation.pdf c578b9e1b04a7655a647f015bd77b7b0 notation.pdf curl -L http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation.pdf | md5sum % Total% Received % Xferd Average

Re: Spacing issue after Mark and TextScript

2018-11-24 Thread Thomas Morley
' Am Sa., 24. Nov. 2018 um 22:28 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley : > > Am Fr., 23. Nov. 2018 um 15:28 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler : > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Sumbler > > Reply > > -To: da...@aeolia.co.uk > > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > > Subject: Spacing issue after Mark and

Re: Spacing issue after Mark and TextScript

2018-11-24 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Fr., 23. Nov. 2018 um 15:28 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler : > > -Original Message- > From: David Sumbler > Reply > -To: da...@aeolia.co.uk > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Spacing issue after Mark and TextScript > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:24:29 + > > %%% >

Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable?

2018-11-24 Thread Michael Gerdau
>> I am curious then as to why it all works fine for me and presumably others? >> Sounds like a Mac font problem to me, given my other current experience >> with Alegreya, as initially raised by Kieren. >> Or has 2.19.82 been rebuilt since I downloaded it some time ago? >> I may be wrong! > >