I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> As wonderful as Mutopia is, it can't be the home of all open scores.
> It would be good to have an aggre
As wonderful as Mutopia is, it can't be the home of all open scores.
It would be good to have an aggregator-based approach rather than one
where everybody uses the same repo.
Personally, I use Github whenever I make a Lilypond score of a public
domain source. See:
https://github.com/lucasgonze/
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:40 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> It is not really new, but I keep being surprised at the things
> proprietary/commercial software vendors are getting away with doing to
> their paying customers.
Vendors have your existing scores as hostages to keep you paying. It's
the opp
> Lucas Gonze writes:
>
>> I made the same switch and am happy about it. I'm not as fast with
>> Lilypond yet, but am getting there.
>>
>> I especially like that that my scores won't become uneditable whenever
>> I stop buying upgrades from Sibel
I made the same switch and am happy about it. I'm not as fast with
Lilypond yet, but am getting there.
I especially like that that my scores won't become uneditable whenever
I stop buying upgrades from Sibelius.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Michael Rivers
> I'm a current Sibelius user who fo
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:>
> Is it architecturally possible to make a significant amount of
>> overhead go away? Are incremental compiles plausible?
>
> Architecturally it is very difficul
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:22 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> It is very difficult. It's better to use a front-end editor that shows some
> sorta mock-up of the score and that only compiles the nice LilyPond version
> from time to time (if this exists). Getting an actual LilyPond score
> req
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> More generally than that, I think the reason to discuss is to _discover_ the
> areas where you can cooperate. There are obvious areas of interaction --
> e.g. enabling Lilypond output for MuseScore and ensuring that it gets
> update
\set noChordSymbol = ""
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Anders Eriksson
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just started using Lilypond and I must say it exceeds all my
> expectations!
>
> I trying to add Chords to a melody using \chordmode and I have most things
> working.
> One thing that I would lik
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:16 AM, wrote:
> I know I'm rehashing old ground, but I think that these projects stand to
> mutually benefit from each other if and only if they evolve in "natural"
> directions given their goals. ... In general, the idea of LilyPond is to
> build a master engraver
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
> Speaking of which, Mutopia seems to be pretty much moribund. I sent a score
> to their contributions e-mail address a couple of months ago, which was
> never acknowledged and hasn't appeared on the web site. Nor did I get a
> response to a mail
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nils wrote:
> AFAIK musescore dropped Lilypond export support because of a lack of interest
> and in favour of musicXML (whatever that means, I read it somewhere on the
> musescore twitter account or something like this).
> It may still work, but we can expect it
Here is an experiment I did with a hybrid web/notation approach:
http://soupgreens.com/goodbyebooze/
Notice that everything but the notes is the standard browser stack.
As an example of the benefit, the lyrics scale nicely if you zoom in or out
with the browser. Or you could easily embed a commen
Hi Lilypond-user,
I stumbled across a Mediawiki plugin that enables music, among other
multimedia. Music would be written in Lilypond.
http://wikitex.org/
Quote from there:
After you place special tags in your wiki article, WikiTeX goes to
work; in a nutshell,
\relative c' {
e16-
On Dimanche, sep 14, 2003, at 22:28 America/New_York, Graham Percival
wrote:
I don't know if this works in OSX or not, but I can't imagine why it
wouldn't;
have you tried timidity++? That's what I use to check my scores on
Linux.
Timidity++ is perfect, Graham. Thanks for hooking me up.
For what it's worth, I found a non-bloated midi renderer for OS X that
lets you adjust the tempo. Still a GUI tool, but fine otherwise.
Google "Mighty Midi".
- Lucas
On Mardi, sep 16, 2003, at 07:47 America/New_York, Terje Tjervaag wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:14:46 -0
empo command
only in the \midi{} or only in the \notes{} or both and report
back to the list if you see any differences.
/Mats
Terje Tjervaag wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:14:46 -0400
Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course there are a bazillion software sequencers, but none of th
Sorry to get off topic so soon after starting to hang around here, but
I have a question that Lilypond types are likely to know the answer to.
The problem is that tempo instructions in MIDI files are ignored by all
the free sequencers I've been able to find for OS X, my working
platform. The s
On Samedi, sep 13, 2003, at 12:22 America/New_York, Rune Zedeler wrote:
Lucas Gonze wrote:
Given the following score, the 2nd note should come out in the DVI as
an F sharp, but is instead an F natural. Any suggestions? Have
mercy -- I am still struggling through the "hello world&q
ELEASE_PPC Power
Macintosh powerpc
Thanks!
- Lucas Gonze
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
20 matches
Mail list logo
