Thanks for raising the topic. I've been extracting small examples using
Gimp. I'll have to try -dpreview!
Regards,
Bruys
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Ralf Mattes wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:23:28 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>
> > you are missing the option -dprev
on Reference
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitches#automatic-accidentals
under the "modern" style, it would be clearer if the sentence "The
modernrule prints the same accidentals as
default, with two exceptions..." were amended to "Other than this, the
modern rule prints the same accidentals as default, with two further
exceptions...", or otherwise rewritten, as the sentence before it has been
added explaining that this style also prints fewer natural signs.
Regards,
Bruys
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ing a tempo relationship.
Your 2nd example is not likely to be used often, as the two ties are fussy
without introducing any extra clarity to the beat. But, I can imagine it
might be used to visually make a parallel to another part, in rare
circumstances.
Regards,
Bruys
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:
Dear Janek,
Thanks for the reply. Please see comments, below.
Regards,
Bruys
2011/4/18 Janek Warchoł
> Dear Bruce,
>
> 2011/4/16 bruys . :
> > I've read this thread. It seems to be mainly concerned with making the
> > brackets extend to the full duration of the notes,
Dear Edward,
Thanks for sharing your solution. This is something I'm likely to use.
Regards,
Bruys
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Edward Neeman wrote:
> Here's the solution I came up with. I just copy/pasted the Scheme code and
> edited it a little, I don't understand how
Thanks, Carl, I've added some notes, below.
Regards,
Bruys
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/15/11 11:55 PM, "bruys ." wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I would like the alter the length of the tuplet bracket so
Dear Janek,
Thanks for the reply. I've more questions , see below.
Regards,
Bruce
2011/4/16 Janek Warchoł
> 2011/4/16 bruys . :
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I would like the alter the length of the tuplet bracket so it extends
> from
> > the left-hand edge of th
pond draws
the bracket enclosing the noteheads, not just the stems.
Thanks,
Bruys
%% tuplets
\version "2.12.3"
\header {
title = "Tuplets"
}
notes = {
%% nb. '3's clash in the following
\times 2/3 { b'8[
\times 2/3 { b'16 b' b'
Dear Jan-Peter,
Which version are you using? This doesn't work with 2.12.3, an '(n)' appears
above the extender line in the second bar.
Regards,
Bruys
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> I think you can't move TextScrip
Sorry, I've gone off half-cocked. I can't get this to work when the second
note in the tie has an accidental. I thought I could get it to work, as
follows, but the tie doesn't print, and the accidental I'm trying not to
print gets printed.
Bruys
\version "2.12.3"
we can trick Lilypond into drawing a tie between notes
which appear to be different enharmonic spellings.
Do you prefer this way, Nils? You don't have to muck around the changing the
shape of a slur.
Regards,
Bruys
\version "2.12.3"
% ties work between notes with same name, even th
P.S. Sorry, the closing brace '}' was missing.
>
>
> \version "2.12.3"
> % enharmonic ties
>
> \score {
> { ces''2 ~ ces''2
> ces''2( b'2)
> <<
> { ces''2( ces''2)
> }
> \\
> { s2.
>\once \override Stem #'transparent = ##t
>\once \override Not
ll have to try and dig through those source files.
Regards,
Bruys
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
> bruys . gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I wondered if
> > \partcombine is supposed to work with more than two parts. The
> > documentation refers to comb
the cue note method.
Regards,
Bruys
\version "2.12.3"
% enharmonic ties
\score {
{ ces''2 ~ ces''2
ces''2( b'2)
<<
{ ces''2( ces''2)
}
\\
{ s2.
\once \override St
I'm not really sure
how to use his snippet. If you have an example, that would be
appreciated.
Regards,
Bruys
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:35 AM, James Lowe wrote:
>>> The problem is that in this example, there is a collision with the
>>> tie, second from the top (d'
Dear Nick,
Looks like a good thing to try, when in difficulty.
There isn't any collision avoidance occurring, of course; slurs are
usually placed further away from the notes than ties.
If you make the middle voices vacant, you can see this.
Regards,
bruys
\version "2.12.3&quo
s no much of the tie before it
disappears behind the sharp sign.
Best wishes,
bruys
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, -Eluze wrote:
>
> hi bruys
>
> bruys . wrote:
>>
>> The one disappointing aspect is that (with version 2.13), I get a
>> warning that Lilypond couldn't
volved. But, that would be a bit of a hack, as this wouldn't
generally be the case.)
Regards,
bruys
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:07 PM, -Eluze wrote:
>
>
> bruys . wrote:
>>
>> Hello Again,
>>
>> Part 2: If I put each part into a separate voice contex
would all be relevant.
Perhaps it is something as simple as needing to configure JEdit to
find your pdf reader or Lilypond:
http://lilypondtool.blogspot.com/p/install-configure.html
Regards,
bruys
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Michael Dykes wrote:
> I just started using JEdit and the Lilyp
my pathetic attempts to resolve the problem in my
previous post).
Thanks to all you people working on bug fixes - Lilypond is an
impressive achievement.
Regards,
bruys
P.S. As an aside, the Scheme function context-spec-music is referred
to in the snippets, without giving any details of what it does
Hello Again,
Part 2: If I put each part into a separate voice context, the ties are
in the right direction, but otherwise it's a real mess.
Thanks,
bruys
partOne = {
\voiceOne
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t % for arpeggiated ties
\once \override Beam #'positions = #'(5.0
Part 2 to follow!
Thanks,
bruys
\version "2.12.3"
partOne = {
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t % for arpeggiated ties
\once \override Beam #'positions = #'(5.0 . 5.0) % raise beam to avoid
% collision with top tie
x27;m not giving up yet.
Your white box idea is yet another avenue for exploration.
Thanks for your help!
Regards,
bruys
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:49 PM, madMuze wrote:
>
>>It will be interesting to see if it works
>>in this example where there is more than one tie at a time.
>>That pot
-- Forwarded message --
From: bruys .
Date: Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: Beyond bars, book by Elaine Gould
To: flup2
Dear Philippe,
Behind Bars is published by Faber Music (Elaine Gould is an editor
with Faber), so it is more likely to be available with a print
-- Forwarded message --
From: bruys .
Date: Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Dividing ties and adjusting ties in an arpeggiated chord
To: -Eluze
Dear Eluze,
Thank you very much for that, it looks like just what I need. The link
didn't work, but knowing the title
I'd like some help on how to adjust ties. The following example comes
from Behind Bars: The Definitive Guide to Music Notation by Elaine
Gould, p.133; or it would do, if I could get it to work.
The problem is that in this example, there is a collision with the
tie, second from the top (d'') and th
26 matches
Mail list logo