On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Yes, there's a short one on the main Vivi page:
http://percival-music.ca/vivi.html
Erm, I'm pretty sure you don't care about video encoding but if you
ever do, please note that using video HTML tags with WebM
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:46:34AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Yes, there's a short one on the main Vivi page:
http://percival-music.ca/vivi.html
Erm, I'm pretty sure you don't care about video encoding
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 02:58:39AM -0300, Pato Press wrote:
And, if you want to, I have a not so good violin made in Blender, nearly
with all it's pieces. I have never completely finish it.
In case anybody is wondering about this, the blender model is
absolutely awesome, and it's now part
How do I get the video? I just got a wave file from
../build/src/actions2wav unit.actions
Nils
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:07:28 +0100
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 02:58:39AM -0300, Pato Press wrote:
And, if you want to, I have a not so good violin
Hi Nils
2011/4/7 Nils Hammerfest n...@hammerfeste.com
How do I get the video? I just got a wave file from
../build/src/actions2wav unit.actions
Nils
Just
cd blender
make test # first do the test. These should give you 3 violin bow img in the
/tmp/vivi-movie/ that you could verify with
Hi Marcos (etc.)
Just
cd blender
make test # first do the test. These should give you 3 violin bow img in the
/tmp/vivi-movie/ that you could verify with your prefer soft.
make mpeg # rest a couple of minutes. While it renders the movie and there
you'll have a ./unit.mpeg
Any preview
2011/4/7 Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com:
Hi Marcos (etc.)
Just
cd blender
make test # first do the test. These should give you 3 violin bow img in the
/tmp/vivi-movie/ that you could verify with your prefer soft.
make mpeg # rest a couple of minutes. While it renders the movie
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:16:10PM +0200, Christ van Willegen wrote:
Any preview movies that can be put up anywhere?
Yes, there's a short one on the main Vivi page:
http://percival-music.ca/vivi.html
and a longer one on the conference webpage:
http://percival-music.ca/smc2011.html
I still
Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net writes:
On 3/25/2011 5:17 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
David,
Again: staring into the sun is not overstimulation since it is not
overloading the sensors with content but rather blocking them. Looking
into the sun can't be characterized as I am seeing too much.
On Friday 18 Mar 2011 08:14:48 Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
Let's say, i love J. S. Bach very much (well, let's say), as much as my
father and grandfather (etc). So, can i really be sure that i understand
his music as good as my grandfather?.. I mean that every Beethoven's
symphony contains a
Dmytro O. Redchuk brownian@gmail.com writes:
On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 18:08 Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Unfortunately, lower barrier of entry almost always means more crap to
sift through.
The more crap -- the lower criteria barrier for what is `crap'?.
The more crap will become normal and even
Hi David,
You can sympathize with your grandfather, but comparing the qualities
and substance of your response seems a bit far-stretched.
Not at all, I think… and very useful.
Oliver Sacks, for one example, measures and reports on [extreme] sensory
perceptive (dis)abilities -- and books like
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi David,
You can sympathize with your grandfather, but comparing the qualities
and substance of your response seems a bit far-stretched.
Not at all, I think… and very useful.
Obviously I disagree.
Oliver Sacks, for one example,
Hello
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of David Kastrup
)Sent: 25 March 2011 16:31
)To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: [OT] Vivi, the Virtual Violinist, plays
Hi David,
Not at all, I think… and very useful.
Obviously I disagree.
Obviously. =)
The trend seems more in the direction of understimulation to me.
Obviously, I disagree. =)
Twenty (never mind fifty) years ago, we [apparently] didn't need:
subwoofers at +10dB, and over-emphasized
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi David,
Not at all, I think… and very useful.
Obviously I disagree.
Obviously. =)
The trend seems more in the direction of understimulation to me.
Obviously, I disagree. =)
Twenty (never mind fifty) years ago, we [apparently]
Hi David,
Well, doesn't that speak towards understimulation to you?
Absolutely not: relative to past generations, today's youth apparently need to
be overstimulated (*not* understimulated) in order to feel the same amount.
In other words, more sensory stimulation needs to be present for them
Am Freitag, 25. März 2011, um 19:03:20 schrieb David Kastrup:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Twenty (never mind fifty) years ago, we [apparently] didn't need:
subwoofers at +10dB, and over-emphasized bass+drum hits, in order
to feel the music; a visual cut every
Hi Reinhold,
Or it simply means that you have stared into the sun / spotlight a bit too
long, so now everything appears dark to you, no matter how bright it actually
is...
+1
I'm glad *someone* gets me. ;)
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Freitag, 25. März 2011, um 19:03:20 schrieb David Kastrup:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Twenty (never mind fifty) years ago, we [apparently] didn't need:
subwoofers at +10dB, and over-emphasized bass+drum
David,
Again: staring into the sun is not overstimulation since it is not
overloading the sensors with content but rather blocking them. Looking
into the sun can't be characterized as I am seeing too much.
There's clearly a semantic misunderstanding here, and it doesn't look like it's
On 3/25/2011 5:17 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
David,
Again: staring into the sun is not overstimulation since it is not
overloading the sensors with content but rather blocking them. Looking
into the sun can't be characterized as I am seeing too much.
There's clearly a semantic
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 02:58:39AM -0300, Pato Press wrote:
And, if you want to, I have a not so good violin made in Blender, nearly
with all it's pieces. I have never completely finish it. I make it just to
start learning how to use Blender. but if you want it, I can sent it to
I've seen these threat when it was just an 8 mails threat!!!
It grows BIG JAJAA!!
Indeed. This thread becomes a threat because it's so big...
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Wed 23 Mar 2011, 01:57 Graham Percival wrote:
If you look at an opera from a
certain time period and certain country, the bass singer is always
the bad guy, the tenor is always the good guy, the soprano is
always the love interest, etc.
Ha-ha :-)
Pop music (and thus a lot of Vocaloid
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Pop music (and thus a lot of Vocaloid stuff) gets a bad rap for
using the I IV V I chord progression a lot, but I don't see that
amount of predictability to be any worse than classical music's
predictability of beat strength in 4/4 time
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:03:55PM +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
On Sun 20 Mar 2011, 18:27 Graham Percival wrote:
On an objective level, it's allowed many people to create music. On a
subjective level, listening (and watching) Vocaloid music has
brought me more pleasure than *any*
On 3/22/2011 9:57 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
Pop music (and thus a lot of Vocaloid stuff) gets a bad rap for
using the I IV V I chord progression a lot, but I don't see that
amount of predictability to be any worse than classical music's
predictability of beat strength in 4/4 time
On 11-03-22 07:57 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
Pop music (and thus a lot of Vocaloid stuff) gets a bad rap for
using the I IV V I chord progression a lot, but I don't see that
amount of predictability to be any worse than classical music's
predictability of beat strength in 4/4 time
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
In the 1940s, a barometer of popular taste was Frank Sinatra (who
could sing/croon/perform, but not really write lyrics or music)
singing/performing/crooning songs written by others (who *could* write
lyrics and/or music, but not
On Sun 20 Mar 2011, 18:27 Graham Percival wrote:
I really, honestly, love Vocaloid (that waste of time).
;)
That was an attempt to direct myself to better wording; i am not sure i
succeeded, sorry .)
I appreciate your tastes, of course.
On an objective level, it's allowed many people to
Hi James,
and so we're back to Graham's point. Anyone can now make 'music' without
having to spend years learning a 'real' instrument etc.
It's not so much some 'musicians' can no longer play an instrument or read
music but that some extra 'musicians' can now create music without having to
Hello,
Yes very good question. One thing that comes to mind is that I don't want to
arrive at a point where musician will be teaching computers to play instead of
learning to play themselves.
We're long past that point. Many many pop and rock and hip hop keyboardists
can't really play, i.e.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:35:37AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Trevor,
Of course, we can't know about good stuff that vanished and has not been
rediscovered :)
Have you ever heard Mozart's son's piano music? There are some
pieces (especially the Mazurkas) which are clearly
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:50:04PM +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
Can't imagine how many issues they could fix instead of that waste of time...
That goes for *anything* we do for entertainment -- including
academic music / musicology / history / lilypond work / etc.
Any one of us could have
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:26:40AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Rather, I'm railing against the following [possibly inevitable, but still
disheartening] reality:
In the 1940s, a barometer of popular taste was Frank Sinatra
...
In the 1960s, the barometer was Bob Dylan (who can write great
Hi Graham,
IMO, the world would be a better place if we were more precise in
our musical judgements.
Fair enough.
If you don't specify that something is a personal opinion, then go objective
or go home.
Some philosophers would say that every statement is subjective, even The sun
rose
Hi Graham,
On a subjective level, listening (and watching) Vocaloid music has
brought me more pleasure than *any* academic music composition
(going back as far as the Rite of Spring
I couldn't even make it through one 3-minute Vocaloid song, but have listened
with great pleasure to the Rite
I don't find this disheartening -- I consider this a triumph of science.
As Patton Oswald once said, We're Science: all about 'coulda', not about
'shoulda'! =)
I somewhat consider produced music recordings to be in a category like
theatre or movies -- they might involve live music at some
On 03/17/2011 07:15 AM, Marc Mouries wrote:
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who
deserves to create good music? but rather who wants to listen to
music made by someone that does not practice? and who wants to listen
to music played by a computer? Sure many times,
Hi Michael,
The reason most musicians despise the Pachelbel Canon
has nothing to do with the quality of the composition. They're
just sick of it, largely because it became so popular in the late '70s
And beyond:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdxkVQy7QLM
Enjoy!
Kieren.
On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 18:08 Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Unfortunately, lower barrier of entry almost always means more crap to
sift through.
The more crap -- the lower criteria barrier for what is `crap'?.
The more crap will become normal and even good thing.
And at some point in the future we all
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:14:48AM +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 18:08 Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Unfortunately, lower barrier of entry almost always means more crap to
sift through.
The more crap -- the lower criteria barrier for what is `crap'?.
The more crap will
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:14:48AM +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 18:08 Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Unfortunately, lower barrier of entry almost always means more crap to
sift through.
The more crap -- the lower criteria
On Fri 18 Mar 2011, 10:44 Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:14:48AM +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 18:08 Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Unfortunately, lower barrier of entry almost always means more crap to
sift through.
The more crap -- the lower criteria
Graham,
Has that happened with books? Have stories become
total crap over the past 10/50/200 years?
Actually, yes: no author made a million dollars writing a Harlequin Romance
novel in the 1500s. :)
To be clear, I'm not saying -- as many, many music lovers do -- that good
music stopped
David,
The average Usenet flame is less edifying to read than, say, Old French
fabliaux, or equivalent verbiage like The Miller's Tale in Chaucer's
Canterbury Tales.
That may be the understatement of the year. =)
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing
Hi Dmytro,
I don't know. We can't measure this. Do we have the same sensitivity as our
grandfathers?
We *can* measure this, and we don't. Studies have been done in visual
perception, auditory perception, rate of data absorption, and detail extraction
-- and all of them point to a decrease
, the Virtual Violinist, plays LilyPond music
)
) ... -- and recent studies on youth support my belief with
)evidence. On the music side, consider the fact that recent studies have
)shown a majority of young people prefer the sound of compressed audio
)(e.g., low- to medium-bitrate MP3s) to uncompressed
@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: [OT] Vivi, the Virtual Violinist, plays LilyPond music
)
) ... -- and recent studies on youth support my belief with
)evidence. On the music side, consider the fact that recent studies have
)shown a majority of young people prefer the sound of compressed audio
)(e.g., low
2011/3/18 Dmytro O. Redchuk brownian@gmail.com
On Fri 18 Mar 2011, 10:44 Graham Percival wrote:
Has that happened with books? Have stories become total crap over
the past 10/50/200 years?
:-)
I don't know. We can't measure this. Do we have the same sensitivity as our
grandfathers?
Hi James,
do you have any reference to those recent studies?
Search Google for study prefer mp3s berger and you'll find the MP3 study.
My own anecdotal evidence is that it depends on the 'depth' and how much you
'study' music as a profession or significant hobby
Definitely. And -- a propos
Hi Nick,
My observation, from having worked in a recording studio and at an University
FM station in my youth, is that there is usually an inverse relationship
between people's interest in hifi and how much live music they participate
in, whether as performer or listener. In other words,
)Subject: Re: [OT] Vivi, the Virtual Violinist, plays LilyPond music
)
)2011/3/18 Dmytro O. Redchuk brownian@gmail.com
)
) On Fri 18 Mar 2011, 10:44 Graham Percival wrote:
) Has that happened with books? Have stories become total crap over
) the past 10/50/200 years?
) :-)
)
) I don't know
Hi James,
When you are a 'grandfather' you will know the answer because the 'good'
stuff of today will still be around or known and the 'bad' stuff will not (or
rather it will be 'somewhere' but everyone will have forgotten about it).
Yes, the Sieve of Time is a powerful arbiter of taste.
On 3/18/11, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Graham,
Has that happened with books? Have stories become
total crap over the past 10/50/200 years?
Actually, yes: no author made a million dollars writing a Harlequin Romance
novel in the 1500s. :)
Hmm. I'll admit that
On 3/18/11, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Yes, the Sieve of Time is a powerful arbiter of taste. =)
IMO, it is the *only* arbiter of (general population) taste. While
the *only* arbiter of your personal taste is you.
There must be examples in both directions, of
Kieren MacMillan wrote Friday, March 18, 2011 1:23 PM
There must be examples in both directions, of course:
bad stuff surviving (even thriving!), and good stuff
disappearing.
Didn't Bach's compositions vanish from the wider public
for c. 100 years until Mendelssohn discovered and revived
2011/3/18 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On 3/18/11, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Graham,
Has that happened with books? Have stories become
total crap over the past 10/50/200 years?
Actually, yes: no author made a million dollars writing a Harlequin
On Fri 18 Mar 2011, 13:31 Graham Percival wrote:
But regardless of quality, it *is* music. It's a
human being active, instead of watching American Idol. It's a human
being creative.
:-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_RVLOsUW6U
Those who programmed it, are *very* creative. They did it for
Graham (et al.),
I'll admit that penny dreadfuls were in the 1800s, not 1500s
Actually, some of those penny dreadfuls were far from it! =)
but I'm certain that the 1500s still had raunchy, low-class
theatrical plays and songs. I don't believe that everybody sat around
in their castles
Hi Graham,
IMO, it is the *only* arbiter of (general population) taste.
Not true -- like it or not, there are forces beyond general population taste
which apply to the Sieve of Time.
While the *only* arbiter of your personal taste is you.
Agreed.
IMO, If something thrives, then it's good
Janek:
I think the problem is what exactly were they questioned about? Was is
which one do you like better listening to? (a question about taste,
to which your above example correspons good) or which one is better
quality/is more similar to 'live audio'? (a technical question about
Hi Trevor,
There must be examples in both directions, of course: bad stuff surviving
(even thriving!), and good stuff disappearing.
Didn't Bach's compositions vanish from the wider public
for c. 100 years until Mendelssohn discovered and revived
his St Matthew Passion?
Yes.
Of course,
Dmytro,
our creativity can make other people more active or make them
watching just another idol. The lower the barrier --- the more crap.
The more crap --- the more just another idols and the less of creativity.
I couldn't have put it better myself.
It is not a bad thing. It is the law
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Dmytro,
our creativity can make other people more active or make them
watching just another idol. The lower the barrier --- the more crap.
The more crap --- the more just another idols and the less of
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:16:35PM -0400, Shane Brandes wrote:
I suppose since I have spent so much
of my life attempting to master keyboard instruments and having watch
so many students progress in their own studies that it seems to me
that one cold never hope to replicate a human at an
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who deserves to create good
music? but rather who wants to listen to music made by someone that does not
practice? and who wants to listen to music played by a computer? Sure many times, nowadays,
the rendition of a computer playing is
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Now, at the moment, Vivi doesn't create good music, and probably
requires about 10 hours of learning. I mean, you have to write a
lilypond file (that could be between 1 and 5 hours, for simple music
at least), and then if you know nothing
Hello all,
At first, I wasn't really interested in this thread… however, it's now gotten
quite interesting.
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who deserves to
create good music? but rather who wants to listen to music made by someone
that does not practice? and who
Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net writes:
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who
deserves to create good music? but rather who wants to listen to
music made by someone that does not practice? and who wants to listen
to music played by a computer? Sure many times, nowadays,
At 10:15 on 17 Mar 2011, Marc Mouries wrote:
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who
deserves to create good music? but rather who wants to listen to
music made by someone that does not practice? and who wants to
listen to music played by a computer?
I don't really see
On 3/17/2011 10:57 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Marc Mouriesm...@mouries.net writes:
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who
deserves to create good music? but rather who wants to listen to
music made by someone that does not practice? and who wants to listen
to music
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:15:46AM -0400, Marc Mouries wrote:
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who
deserves to create good music? but rather who wants to listen
to music made by someone that does not practice? and who wants
to listen to music played by a computer?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:02:59AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
But I also believe that it will be a great while longer before
*watching* a robot (or audio speaker) will be as compelling as
watching a human performer.
BS. Watching musical robots is *incredibly* interesting, and way
way
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
[...]
One thing that comes to mind is that I don't want to arrive at a
point where musician will be teaching computers to play instead of
learning to play themselves.
I hate to break the news, but we're already at that point -- as
Hi David,
Excellent rebuttal!
The whole point is that a computer, left to its own devices, would never
think of playing the violin or chess. It would sit in a corner and rust.
With all due respect, I don't even think that's the point -- for at some future
date, there will undoubtedly be a
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:02:59 -0400
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hello all,
At first, I wasn't really interested in this thread… however, it's
now gotten quite interesting.
Same here ...
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who
hello
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of David Kastrup
)Sent: 17 March 2011 14:57
)To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: [OT] Vivi, the Virtual Violinist, plays
On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 15:31 Graham Percival wrote:
As for *good* computer-performed music... it's not my favorite Miku
work, but can you honestly say that you feel no emotion when
watching this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1Dqb6uJ8WY
(maybe you _can_ say that you feel nothing, but I can't
Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net writes:
On 3/17/2011 10:57 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Marc Mouriesm...@mouries.net writes:
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who
deserves to create good music? but rather who wants to listen to
music made by someone that does not
On 3/17/2011 11:31 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
Art conveys emotions which are the one thing that make us human
and thus should be played by human.
should be? Hmm. Art conveys emotions, and thus sheet music
should be engraved by a human.
You are mixing unrelated things. The analogy is about
David Santamauro david.santama...@gmail.com writes:
One thing a robot, or any type of computer generated music will never
replace is the simple gratification of actually playing -- from a
players perspective.
What a ridiculous criterion. One thing you or any type of human
generated music
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:08:53AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi David,
The whole point is that a computer, left to its own devices, would never
think of playing the violin or chess. It would sit in a corner and rust.
With all due respect, I don't even think that's the point -- for
Quoting Marc Mouries (m...@mouries.net):
This is intellectually interesting but the question is not who deserves to
create good music? but rather who wants to listen to music made by
someone that does not practice? and who wants to listen to music played by
a computer? Sure many times,
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:08:53AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi David,
The whole point is that a computer, left to its own devices, would never
think of playing the violin or chess. It would sit in a corner and rust.
With all due
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:38:48PM -0400, Marc Mouries wrote:
On 3/17/2011 11:31 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
Art conveys emotions which are the one thing that make us human
and thus should be played by human.
should be? Hmm. Art conveys emotions, and thus sheet music
should be engraved by a
Graham,
BS. Watching musical robots is *incredibly* interesting, and way
way way more interesting than a human!
(seriously! I mean, you can wonder how much power it uses, and
whether they use wired or wireless transmission, or how many
degrees of freedom each of the joints offers,
Hi David,
You are confusing teaching, training, and programming.
No: they are simply three different levels/aspects/stages/manifestations of the
same basic task.
You don't teach an encyclopedia or an expert system
You don't train or program an encyclopedia either -- the closest you can
Hi Graham,
With all due respect, I don't even think that's the point -- for
at some future date, there will undoubtedly be a computer which,
left to its own devices, *would* think of playing the violin or
chess rather than sitting in a corner and rusting.
Actually, I doubt that.
Wow,
Hi David,
This day has more-or-less arrived. Whether we like it or not, most of
the music we hear in our daily lives, e.g., radio spots, commercials,
tv-shows and ever-increasingly, major motion pictures are filled with
music generated by computers, albeit mostly through samples generated
by
I, for one, welcome our new computer overlords. -- Ken Jennings
:-,
Mike
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I, for one, welcome our new computer overlords. -- Ken Jennings
=)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Graham == Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
It comes down to this: - new tool for composers.
It's also a tool for music teachers. And I'd argue that that is as
important if not more so.Human students do an awful lot of
Graham,
I think the impact of making it easier and better for music *composers*
will outweigh any inconvience for music *performers*.
[...]
it's created a market for thousands of people to create
music where it was previously impossible.
Unfortunately, lower barrier of entry almost always
Shane Brandes sh...@grayskies.net writes:
As a random aside on the whole electronic music effort. On the
one hand the technology and science is very interesting, but on the
other it is somehow disturbing. I suppose since I have spent so much
of my life attempting to master keyboard
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:42:45AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Mike Blackstock
blackstock.m...@gmail.com wrote:
This is F*G great! Especially the Bach BWV 1006 - I could have sworn it
really was a kid playing.
, the Virtual Violinist, plays LilyPond music
)
)On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Mike Blackstock
)blackstock.m...@gmail.com wrote:
) This is F*G great! Especially the Bach BWV 1006 - I could have
) sworn it really was a kid playing.
) http://percival-music.ca/audio/bwv-1006_1.wav.mp3
)
)To my ears
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Mike Blackstock
blackstock.m...@gmail.com wrote:
This is F*G great! Especially the Bach BWV 1006 - I could have sworn it
really was a kid playing. http://percival-music.ca/audio/bwv-1006_1.wav.mp3
To my ears, the
As a random aside on the whole electronic music effort. On the
one hand the technology and science is very interesting, but on the
other it is somehow disturbing. I suppose since I have spent so much
of my life attempting to master keyboard instruments and having watch
so many students
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
