the Apple universe for good in favor of Linux. But this combo worked
very well for me, and both programs are still around, so that one can
safely assume that it still is an option today.
It is just good to know there are alternatives to Frescobaldi, and it
would be convenient to have them mentioned in
Thanks again for the text, Ken! I've put it up for review along with a
bunch of housekeeping bits, and it could get merged into the
documentation mid-week. You'll be able to point to your contribution to
LilyPond!
Cheers,
Colin
On 2024-05-01 22:33, Kenneth Flak wrote:
OK, giving it a shot
My very first contribution :-) Nice!
Colin Campbell, May 04, 2024 at 02:51:
> Thanks again for the text, Ken! I've put it up for review along with a
> bunch of housekeeping bits, and it could get merged into the
> documentation mid-week. You'll be able to point to your contribution to
> LilyPond
Steph,
Thank you.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
On Behalf Of Steph Phillips
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 11:46 PM
To: Jean Abou Samra ; Graham King
; N. Andrew Walsh
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: Re[2]: Frescobaldi?
Hey all
> Hey all, I've been looking over the Frescobaldi codebase for the last
> few days, and it seems to be within the realm of something I could pick
> up maintenance for.
>
> There would definitely be a learning curve, so hopefully it doesn't
> reach it's EOL
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 7:06 AM Steph Phillips
wrote:
> Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other
> folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think.
>
> After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application
> might benef
Le lundi 06 mai 2024 à 14:05 +, Steph Phillips a écrit :
> Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other
> folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think.
>
> After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application
> mi
ous what other
> folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think.
>
> After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application
> might benefit from a more object-oriented design. It's definitely in
> Python, but with more of C-style approach. You've worked on it, yo
> I'm an intermediate-level python programmer but I might be able to help with
> busy work like typing and documenting functions, with some feedback. Anything
> to give back to a project that I use all the time!
Thanks. However, without wanting to stop you from contributing, I'll reiterate
that
On 2014-10-24 15:01, Noeck wrote:
Hi,
I have a question concerning Frescobaldi: Is it possible to run a custom
script (bash/python) from Frescobaldi.
This would be my use case:
I have a script that runs lilypond and then timidity and other tools to
get ogg rehearsal files which are then
Am 25.10.2014 10:41, schrieb Peter Bjuhr:
On 2014-10-24 15:01, Noeck wrote:
Hi,
I have a question concerning Frescobaldi: Is it possible to run a custom
script (bash/python) from Frescobaldi.
This would be my use case:
I have a script that runs lilypond and then timidity and other tools to
Hi.
2014-10-25 10:41 GMT+02:00 Peter Bjuhr :
> you can run a python script as a Snippet (Tools -> Snippets). If it's
> possible to implement in detail is hard for me to say (without seeing your
> code), but I think that is what you could try if you want to do it within
> F
2014-10-25 11:35 GMT+02:00 Davide Liessi :
> I'll open an issue on Frescobaldi's GitHub tracker about this.
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/512
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mai
ots of special options), and the
second is that Frescobaldi forgets the custom command every time it
quits, so you have to store it elsewhere.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
tions), and the
second is that Frescobaldi forgets the custom command every time it
quits, so you have to store it elsewhere.
The ability to save a custom commands could perhaps be argued. At the
moment the command is construed by the other settings.
To catch the stdout message I think the
the custom engraving item and (more important) it is reverted once I
restart Frescobaldi, so I have to enter the command again.
The suggestion with the snippets works. There is no standard output
within Frescobaldi, though.
I can live with the second solution, but having a persistent
See https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/512
Am 26. Oktober 2014 18:28:01 MEZ, schrieb Joram :
>
>>> However I think that having the possibility to define custom
>compilers
>>> would be very useful.
>>
>>
>> Sorry if I’m wrong, but can’t you ty
Am 26.10.2014 18:28, schrieb Joram:
To explain my use case a bit more: My purpose is to provide a single
file, a list of files or (main usage) a file containing a list of all
files for a project. The script then produces pdf midi output, the
latter for each voice separately. The midi output is
Is this available from MacPorts yet, or will it once it gets into their
system?
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>
> From: Wilbert Berendsen
> To: frescoba...@googlegroups.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Cc:
> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 17:43:23 +0100
> Subject: ANN: Fresc
Dear Conor,
Il 27/12/14 18.12, Conor Cook ha scritto:
Is this available from MacPorts yet, or will it once it gets into their
system?
I have already submitted the update to MacPorts.
I hope they'll merge it in a couple of days at most.
Best wishes.
Davide
Dear Wilbert,
Thanks for the new version of Frescobaldi.
I notice that the installer file of version 2.17 and version 2.17.1
takes a long time before it begins to install the software. It may be
one or two minutes before the install screen appears. I mean when I
double click on the installer
Op Sat, 27 Dec 2014 12:14:44 -0800
Jinsong Zhao schreef:
> Dear Wilbert,
>
> Thanks for the new version of Frescobaldi.
>
> I notice that the installer file of version 2.17 and version 2.17.1
> takes a long time before it begins to install the software. It may be
> one
On 28/12/2014 4:14 AM, Jinsong Zhao wrote:
Dear Wilbert,
Thanks for the new version of Frescobaldi.
I notice that the installer file of version 2.17 and version 2.17.1
takes a long time before it begins to install the software. It may be
one or two minutes before the install screen appears
Davide,
Would there be any advantage to installing the (soon to be released) MacPorts
update instead of the dmg file provided by the Frescobaldi website?
Thanks,
Stan
> On Dec 27, 2014, at 12:47 PM, Davide Liessi wrote:
>
> Dear Conor,
>
> Il 27/12/14 18.12, Conor Cook ha
Am 2014-12-28 um 06:33 schrieb Stan Sanderson :
> Would there be any advantage to installing the (soon to be released) MacPorts
> update instead of the dmg file provided by the Frescobaldi website?
For me the advantage is that I can update a bunch of my tools with one call of
my update
Il 28/12/14 05.27, Henning Hraban Ramm ha scritto:
Am 2014-12-28 um 06:33 schrieb Stan Sanderson :
Would there be any advantage to installing the (soon to be released) MacPorts
update instead of the dmg file provided by the Frescobaldi website?
For me the advantage is that I can update a
Il 27/12/14 18.12, Conor Cook ha scritto:
Is this available from MacPorts yet, or will it once it gets into their
system?
Frescobaldi 2.17.1 is now available on MacPorts.
As usual you just need to
sudo port selfupdate
and then (to upgrade all outdated ports)
sudo port upgrade outdated
Downloaded 2.17.1 but it will NOT install on my win8.1 64bit. The install
window 'vanishes', disappears halfway through and nothing has happened.
Erik
Op zaterdag 27 december 2014 17:43:27 UTC+1 schreef Wilbert Berendsen:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday, shortly after releasi
Op zaterdag 27 december 2014 17:43:27 UTC+1 schreef Wilbert Berendsen:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Yesterday, shortly after releasing Frescobaldi 2.17, a bug was
>> discovered that was also present in 2.0.16: when clicking File→Quit,
>> selecting Cancel would also quit Fres
Thank you Wilbert for such a wonderful Christmas and New Year's gift!
Frescobaldi + LilyPond is a wonderful combo that can do amazing things with
music scores!
Just a quick note to say that Frescobaldi 2.17.1 is now available for
Debian and Ubuntu's development branches:
Thank you, Wilbert, for a fantastic program!
- Abraham
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Wilbert Berendsen-6 [via Lilypond]
> wrote:
>
> Dear friends,
>
> Frescobaldi 2.17.2 has been released, with source code for Linux
> and any other platform
on Mac, when I launch Frescobaldi it does not show the document. I always
have to go to " Window > New Window" to see the lilypond code and the music.
Is there a workaround?
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-Frescobaldi-2-17-2-tp170737p170
> Le 21 janv. 2015 à 05:12, MarcM a écrit :
>
>
> on Mac, when I launch Frescobaldi it does not show the document. I always
> have to go to " Window > New Window" to see the lilypond code and the music.
> Is there a workaround?
>
Hello,
That bug is found
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> Frescobaldi 2.17.2 has been released, with source code for Linux
> and any other platform, and packages for MS Windows and Mac OS X.
> Download via: http://frescobaldi.org/download .
>
> Next r
Dear Marc,
Il 21/01/15 05.12, MarcM ha scritto:
on Mac, when I launch Frescobaldi it does not show the document. I always
have to go to " Window > New Window" to see the lilypond code and the music.
Is there a workaround?
It appears to be the problem described in
https://gith
Dear all,
Has Frescobaldi been successfully installed under Mac Yosemite via MacPorts?
Thanks,
Steve
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Frescobaldi releases.
* Frescobaldi now needs the python-ly package to be installed.
Previously, this module was part of Frescobaldi.
When you overwrite an older Frescobaldi installation, you should make
sure that no old files remain in the file system. Otherwise,
Frescobaldi can't run be
Hello!
I’ve tried to update Frescobaldi without succeding. I installed it the first
time using Macports. I tried using this: "sudo port -v selfupdate" and then
"sudo port upgrade outdated” Everything gets updated but not Frescobaldi. What
am I doing wrong?
Bästa hälsningar
Il 07/03/15 14.02, Peter Danemo ha scritto:
Everything gets updated but not
Frescobaldi. What am I doing wrong?
You're not doing anything wrong: only Frescobaldi has not been updated
yet in MacPorts. :)
I'm preparing the prebuilt DMG disk images right now.
Later I'll subm
Hi!
Ok, great. I have to calm myself a couple of days then...;-)
P
Peter Danemo
Krukmakargatan 33 B
118 51 Stockholm
Tel: +46-70-653 21 91
> 7 mar 2015 kl. 14:10 skrev Davide Liessi :
>
> Il 07/03/15 14.02, Peter Danemo ha scritto:
>> Everything gets updated but not
>> F
`\override Oct`.
Could this change be followed by Frescobaldi?
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
followed by Frescobaldi?
Done (fixed in python-ly, next python-ly release will fix this). Thanks
for reporting!
--
Wilbert Berendsen
(http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
Il 07/03/15 01.18, Wilbert Berendsen ha scritto:
(The Windows Frescobaldi installer contains everything,
including python-ly.)
Also the Mac OS X DMG disk images contain everything you need to run
Frescobaldi, including python-ly.
Best wishes.
Davide
Dear friends,
due to yet unknown reasons, importing ABC, MIDI and MusicXML files with
Frescobaldi does not work in the pre-built standalone application bundle
for Mac OS X.
Those features will work as expected installing Frescobaldi via
MacPorts, as soon as they will update to the latest
Il 08/03/15 16.20, Davide Liessi ha scritto:
due to yet unknown reasons, importing ABC, MIDI and MusicXML files with
Frescobaldi does not work in the pre-built standalone application bundle
for Mac OS X.
The same applies to using convert-ly in Frescobaldi.
Again, I'm really sorry.
D
t`. Could this change be followed by Frescobaldi?
>
> Done (fixed in python-ly, next python-ly release will fix this).
> Thanks for reporting!
If you install python-ly 0.9.1, you'll find that ClefModifier now is
supported. Good luck!
Wilbert
--
Wilbert Ber
> If you install python-ly 0.9.1, you'll find that ClefModifier now is
> supported. Good luck!
Wow, that was quick! Thanks.
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello,
for whatever reason I keep running into problems whenever I try to
upgrade Frescobaldi (or install it on another machine).
This time, I downloaded the .tar.gz bundles of both frescobaldi 2.18 and
python-ly 0.9.1 into ~/Frescobaldi/, unpacked them and installed them
following the
Sorry, should have mentioned that this is on Ubuntu 14.10.
Am 09.03.2015 um 10:22 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
Hello,
for whatever reason I keep running into problems whenever I try to
upgrade Frescobaldi (or install it on another machine).
This time, I downloaded the .tar.gz bundles of both
Dear friends,
Frescobaldi 2.18 is now available also via MacPorts.
As usual you can update your installed ports with the following commands:
sudo port selfupdate # updates MacPorts and the port definitions
port outdated# shows available updates
sudo port upgrade
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Davide Liessi wrote:
>
> Dear friends,
>
> Frescobaldi 2.18 is now available also via MacPorts.
>
> As usual you can update your installed ports with the following commands:
Davide,
Once again, thank you for your work with Frescobal
Dear Stan,
Il 18/03/15 16.40, Stan Sanderson ha scritto:
One question- at this point, is there any essential difference
between frescobaldi 2.18 and sub port frescobaldi-devel? I have been
using the development version for some time and am wondering if there
is any reason to continue doing so
I just tried and had no problem downloading the Windows installer from
Github:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/releases/download/v2.18/Frescobaldi.Setup.2.18.exe
On 03/04/2015 14:27, guoguocuozuoduo wrote:
Hi all,
Firstly, I am not sure if this is the right place to post this message
Hi Wilbert,
there is something I need to say about Frescobaldi:
For several reasons, I'm stuck in the world of Windows. However, I've always
checked out some interesting Linux software on separate partitions or
virtual PCs. Very soon, Frescobaldi became the most important of th
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I just released Frescobaldi 2.18.1 in the wild, a maintenance
> release containing bug fixes, small improvements and translation
> updates.
>
> Homepage: www.frescobaldi.org
> Download: www.
Il giorno dom 24 mag 2015 alle 21:49, Wilbert Berendsen
ha scritto:
I just released Frescobaldi 2.18.1 in the wild, a maintenance
release containing bug fixes, small improvements and translation
updates.
When I click on Open LilyPond data directory nothing happens. What
should I expect to
atum:25-05-2015 01:47 (GMT+01:00)
Aan: Wilbert Berendsen Cc: lilypond-user
, Frescobaldi
Onderwerp: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.18.1
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Dear friends,
I just released Frescobaldi 2.18.1 in the wild, a maintenance
release containing bug fi
On Sun, 24 May 2015, Ralph Palmer wrote:
I'm running Windows 7. Can anyone help with suggestions for installing
python-ly 0.9.2? I have downloaded the tar.gz file,
but cannot open it.
I use pip in a DOS commandline:
pip install python-ly
or if you already have an older version installed:
I now have Frescobaldi 1.18.1 installed along with python-ly 0.9.2.
Now I get the message 'Could not load the popplerqt4 module'. Without
the interactive music view, Frescobaldi is a real bummer. I have
downloaded poppler-0.33.0 and poppler-data-0.4.7, but I don't know what
t
Il giorno lun 25 mag 2015 alle 19:20, William Marchant
ha scritto:
I now have Frescobaldi 1.18.1 installed along with python-ly 0.9.2.
Now I get the message 'Could not load the popplerqt4 module'. Without
the interactive music view, Frescobaldi is a real bummer. I have
download
Also install python-poppler-qt4.
--
Wilbert Berendsen (www.wilbertberendsen.nl)
Sent from my smartphone
Oorspronkelijk bericht Van: William Marchant
Datum:25-05-2015 19:20 (GMT+01:00)
Aan: lilypond-user@gnu.org Onderwerp: Re: ANN:
Frescobaldi 2.18.1
I now have
Am 25.05.2015 um 08:58 schrieb Wilbert Berendsen:
> If you use the windows installer, you don't need to install python-ly
> separately.
Hi Wilbert,
many thanks for this excellent program and the installer. I had never
any problem with the installation as it runs out of the box. The
components i
Datum:25-05-2015 19:20 (GMT+01:00)
Aan: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Onderwerp: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.18.1
I now have Frescobaldi 1.18.1 installed along with python-ly 0.9.2.
Now I get the message 'Could not load the popplerqt4 module'. Without
the interactive music view, Frescobaldi is a real
install python-poppler-qt4, which I guess it's not
installed on your system.
And please always reply to list
Il 26 maggio 2015 01:03:57 CEST, William Marchant ha
scritto:
On 15-05-25 05:09 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il giorno lun 25 mag 2015 alle 19:20, William Marchant
ha scritto:
I
Il 24/05/15 21.49, Wilbert Berendsen ha scritto:
I just released Frescobaldi 2.18.1 in the wild, a maintenance
release containing bug fixes, small improvements and translation
updates.
Homepage: www.frescobaldi.org
Download: www.frescobaldi.org/download
The Mac OS X self-contained
Hello, I've switched to Frescobaldi, it's great. How do I set up where the
output files are stored? The initial setup sends them to a Windows/temp/
folder but I want to change that.
Thanks for any help,
Gerard
___
lilypond-user mailing lis
use code for combining rhythms with music),
2.19 might appeal to you. Check out
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes/> and scroll
down to the entry starting "Isolated durations".
> But all in all, I'm very pleased with both the new version of Lily
Hi,
Maybe this is useful for those who want to run Frescobaldi from Git.
I just succeeded running Frescobaldi using a Git clone as described in
this wiki:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-from-git
But I had to change my desktop file to run Frescobaldi from the menu
Hello Wilbert,
Thanks a lot for this new release, and a happy new year too!
JM
> Le 27 déc. 2015 à 16:14, Wilbert Berendsen a écrit :
>
> Dear friends,
>
> I yeserday released Frescobaldi 2.18.2, a maintenance release
> containing bug fixes, small improvements and t
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I yeserday released Frescobaldi 2.18.2, a maintenance release
> containing bug fixes, small improvements and translation updates.
Thanks, once again, for Frescobaldi, Wilbert Berendsen. What a difference
Wilbert Berendsen-2 wrote
> I yeserday released Frescobaldi 2.18.2, a maintenance release
> containing bug fixes, small improvements and translation updates.
Thank you so much for your work on Frescobaldi, Wilfred.
Wishing you all the best in 2016.
ZK
--
View this message in context:
> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild.
Good job! Thanks!
> - The new LilyPond feature to embed source code files in the PDF
> (LilyPond >= 2.19.39) can be used in publish mode and the custom engrave
> dialog (#813)
I must have missed this in the discussions..
Am 22.04.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Johan Vromans:
>> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild.
> Good job! Thanks!
>
>> - The new LilyPond feature to embed source code files in the PDF
>> (LilyPond >= 2.19.39) can be used in publish mode and the custom engrav
On 22.04.2016 07:55, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Dear all,
Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild.
There are quite a lot improvements and some nice new features.
Bravo and thanks a lot! Especially 800% zoom is very useful.
Best, Simon
Thanks for all your hard work Wilbert! That's a lot of new features! This
app had become a staple for me.
Any idea when the manuscript viewer might be ready?
Best,
Abraham
On Thursday, April 21, 2016, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released
Am 22.04.2016 um 12:01 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> Especially 800% zoom is very useful.
+1
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thanks for the new release. When do you expect it to appear in MacPorts?
Thanks,
Steve
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Il giorno ven 22 apr 2016 alle 7:55, Wilbert Berendsen
ha scritto:
Then Frescobaldi 2.x will go in bugfix mode and development of new
features
will concentrate on Frescobaldi 3.0, which will require Python3 and
Qt5.
Qt5 looks good!
Wilbert, when I launch current master I get a warning about
d/
python3 setup.py build
The build now is ok.
I get an error when I install it:
##
[...]
creating dist
creating 'dist/frescobaldi-3.0.0-py3.4.egg' and adding
'build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg' to it
removing 'build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg' (and everything unde
, newly installed Debian
8.4 jessie system.
Are you able to clarify what has gone wrong with these builds?
Andrew
On 22/04/2016, 3:55 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Wilbert Berendsen"
wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild.
>
Hi Andrew,
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> The 2.19 release seems premature. The contents of the tar file have code that
> clearly refers to Qt4.
Um, so... 2.19 still uses Qt4. In the future, version 3.0 will require Qt5
(and Python3).
Hope that helps,
-Paul
_
Hi Paul,
Thanks so much. I had somehow got it into my thick skull that Qt5 was required,
hence I got myself into a thorough mess. I note 2.19 uses python 2 and not
python 3 - also had me mixed up.
All now works.
Apologies for the noise, all.
Andrew
On 23/04/2016, 10:32 AM, "Paul Morris"
you are building from master, you are using Frescobaldi 3.0, which
needs python3 and qt5 (see my previous emails in this thread).
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Paul Morris wrote:
Um, so... 2.19 still uses Qt4. In the future, version 3.0 will require
Qt5 (and Python3).
So future Frescobaldi 3.x version will require Python3.
Python scripts in the LilyPond package currently need Python2. On Linux
Fedora I'm running it
Il giorno sab 23 apr 2016 alle 8:49, Martin Tarenskeen
ha scritto:
- Why isn't LilyPond bundled with at least Python 2.7? Are there any
known
issues with Python 2.7? It seems to work fine here on my Fedora box.
- If future versions of Frescobaldi will require Python3, wouldn't
t
Hi Martin,
I have brought this topic up before, but it keeps getting knocked back by
naysayers.
I am volunteering to bring lilypond to Python 3. It would be helpful in many
ways. Are there objections, folks?
Andrew
On 23/04/2016, 4:49 PM, "Martin Tarenskeen" wrote:
>
>I know, the questio
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I have brought this topic up before, but it keeps getting knocked back
> by naysayers.
>
> I am volunteering to bring lilypond to Python 3. It would be helpful
> in many ways. Are there objections, folks?
Well, unless there are really compelling reasons ot
2016-04-22 19:08 GMT+02:00 Steve Noland :
> When do you expect it to appear in MacPorts?
I'm updating the Portfiles right now. After I submit them, I expect
the usual 1-3 days for approval.
Best wishes.
Davide
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-us
2016-04-22 7:55 GMT+02:00 Wilbert Berendsen :
> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild.
Precompiled application for (Mac) OS X coming in a few hours.
Best wishes.
Davide
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
ht
2016-04-22 7:55 GMT+02:00 Wilbert Berendsen :
> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild.
Precompiled application for (Mac) OS X are now available.
Download: http://frescobaldi.org/download
Best wishes.
Davide
___
lilypond-user mailing l
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:22:23 +0200
Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 22.04.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Johan Vromans:
> >> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild.
> > Good job! Thanks!
> >
> >> - The new LilyPond feature to embed source code files in the PDF
Hi,
print 'foo' vs. print('foo') is usually the most frequent difference and
writing code for a 'common subset' in most cases requires at least some
from __future__ imports to ensure compatibility.
However, the 2to3 tool is handy and there are very sane and good
guidelines for porting python code
On Sat 23 Apr 2016 at 22:09:55 (+0200), Noeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> print 'foo' vs. print('foo') is usually the most frequent difference and
> writing code for a 'common subset' in most cases requires at least some
> from __future__ imports to ensure compatibility.
All my programs converted perfectly
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:22:23 +0200
Urs Liska wrote:
>/Am 22.04.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Johan Vromans:/
>/ >> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild. /
>/ > Good job! Thanks!/
>/ > /
>/ >> - The new LilyPond feature to embed source code files in th
Am 24.04.2016 um 09:39 schrieb Villum Sejersen:
>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:22:23 +0200
>> Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> >/Am 22.04.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Johan Vromans:/
>> >/>> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild. /
>> >/> Good job! Than
update procedure (e.g. apt-get update && upat-get upgrade).
> If you have downloaded LilyPond as a binary release this will of course
> *not* detect the availability of any newer releases.
Much simpler: Frescobaldi seems to use the timestamp of the binary to detect
updates.
My
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Jim Tisdall wrote:
> In trying to compile frescobaldi on my mac pro osx10.7.5, I have the
> program running but I've run into the following problem with trying
> to get the python-poppler-qt4-0.16.3 extension to work:
>
> $ python setup.py
On Jan 12, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Jim Tisdall wrote:
> In trying to compile frescobaldi on my mac pro osx10.7.5, I have the
> program running but I've run into the following problem with trying
> to get the python-poppler-qt4-0.16.3 extension to work:
Hi Jim, I got as far as trying
k together.
If it is what you did too, for what I see in your log, the OS X installed
Python runs in place of the Macports installed Python.
The best way to avoid that would be to enter the complete path to the
Macports python to run Frescobaldi:
/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Ve
what I did, in case they might help.
-Paul
___
Installing Frescobaldi using MacPorts
(Mac OS 10.8.2, Frescobaldi 2.0.8)
Logged in to admin user account on Mac OS X
INSTALLING MACPORTS
- installed Xcode, downloaded from apple dev center
(copying Xcode.app fr
601 - 700 of 1528 matches
Mail list logo
