Patrick, you wrote Monday, September 01, 2008 7:53 PM
Just my two cents and I know I'll have no influence and know that the
great documentation project is winding down, but just wanted to say it
because it's been a frustration of mine. I wish I'd gotten involved
sooner instead of coming in t
James E. Bailey wrote:
That is very well covered in LM 5, so I can understand why it wouldn't
be duplicated.
That was my concern about the policy in the LM to never cover anything
that was previously covered...it means that you (the reader) have to
have integrated the content of previous sectio
rote:
Jonathan
Have a look at NR 5.3.4 The \tweak command. I rewrote this recently,
so I'd like to know whether or not this is clear and helpful. Thanks.
Trevor
- Original Message - From: "Jonathan Kulp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James E. Bailey" <
Am 01.09.2008 um 01:07 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
It was with the extra offset part. I was putting the #' in the
wrong place (inside the parentheses instead of out). If I had dug
deeper I probably could have figured it out but I just googled a
solution instead. I don't think it's a problem
It was with the extra offset part. I was putting the #' in the wrong
place (inside the parentheses instead of out). If I had dug deeper I
probably could have figured it out but I just googled a solution
instead. I don't think it's a problem with \tweak part of the docs.
You can't possibly en
Jonathan, you wrote Sunday, August 31, 2008 11:30 PM
Ok, now I'm getting somewhere. I couldn't make the \tweak command work
with extra-offset from looking at the manual
Can you give me a clue what the difficulty was? Did
you use a recent manual? Was the difficulty with the
\tweak command
a look at NR 5.3.4 The \tweak command. I rewrote this recently, so
I'd like to know whether or not this is clear and helpful. Thanks.
Trevor
- Original Message - From: "Jonathan Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James E. Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: &l
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; "Steven Padalino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: LH fingering not working
Ha! I totally forgot about "tweak"! Now I remember seeing that example
where one note of a chord is sm
Ha! I totally forgot about "tweak"! Now I remember seeing that example
where one note of a chord is smaller than the other three. I'm going to
try it. Many thanks, James. I bet this will fix it.
Jonathan
James E. Bailey wrote:
First, I know nothing about this, but,
Am 31.08.2008 um 19:23
First, I know nothing about this, but,
Am 31.08.2008 um 19:23 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Hi Tom,
While it's possible to position fingerings very precisely using
extra-offset,
you can only do so to notes inside chord constructs. Fine. The
problem
is that if you're trying to position the finge
Hi Tom,
Ok I've been fiddling with this for a while and I don't suppose I'm any
farther along than you were. One of the problems is something that I
noticed when I was engraving one of my own pieces a few days ago. While
it's possible to position fingerings very precisely using extra-offset,
yo
Tom,
I'll try to fiddle with this tonight. Hurricane Gustav is headed
straight toward my home in Lafayette, Louisiana, so we've evacuated to
my parents' house in Tennessee until the storm goes through. I'll
probably have some Lilypond time later today though. Glad the docs and
the examples
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I did the documentation on guitar stuff so I'm familiar with this issue.
Jonathan - thanks for the extended examples. Very helpful.
However,
Here's a sticky wicket I cannot get past:
\relative c'{
<<
{ s2 r4
\over
Jonathan Kulp wrote
Perhaps we should add an example in Notation Reference where it talks
about "controlling the placement of chord fingerings" showing that even
for single notes you have to use a chord construct for the
fingeringOrientation to work. I didn't get to do this in fretted string
Carl,
Perhaps we should add an example in Notation Reference where it talks
about "controlling the placement of chord fingerings" showing that even
for single notes you have to use a chord construct for the
fingeringOrientation to work. I didn't get to do this in fretted
strings because "fin
Hi Steven,
I did the documentation on guitar stuff so I'm familiar with this issue.
I suspect that what you're missing is a <> chord construct around
whatever it is that you want affected. When I was running through all
of the commands I noticed that the only way the \set
fingeringOrientatio
On Aug 28, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Steven Padalino wrote:
Hi,
Using Lilipond 2.10.33 with jEdit 4.3pre15 on Windows XP SP2.
The \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left) is not working. Finger
numbers continue to appear at the top or bottom of note stems.
I could easily be wrong but try #'(LEFT)
Hi,
Using Lilipond 2.10.33 with jEdit 4.3pre15 on Windows XP SP2.
The \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left) is not working. Finger numbers
continue to appear at the top or bottom of note stems.
I have the command positioned after the "staffClassicalGuitar = \new Staff"
command and before
18 matches
Mail list logo