Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-29 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 29.02.2016 18:00, Klaus Blum wrote: you could add \with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0) Or, in 2.19.37, equivalently: \with-dimensions-from \null Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-29 Thread Paul Booker
> > Hi Paul, > > one more try: I've installed LP 2.19.37. > Yes, it has a different behavior: default whiteout style is the "classic" > old box style that covers everything behind. You can set the "outline" > style: > Does that work for you? > > Cheers, > Klaus Yes, with 2.19.36 it seems

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-29 Thread Klaus Blum
Hi Paul, one more try: I've installed LP 2.19.37. Yes, it has a different behavior: default whiteout style is the "classic" old box style that covers everything behind. You can set the "outline" style: % --- \version "2.19.36"

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-29 Thread Klaus Blum
Paul Booker wrote > ... but leaves the layout as if the graphic still occupied space above the > staff. SO there is extra white space at the top. Hi Paul, you could add \with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0) which tells LP to behave as if the following markup had the given dimensions (in

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-29 Thread Paul Booker
> > A direction modifier (- for ‘neutral’, ^ for ‘up’ or _ for ‘down’) is > needed to mark a post event, i.e. in this case a text script attached to > a note. > > HTH, Simon > Thanks Simon I should have figured that out. What I have figured out is that a post event may handle a layer change

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-29 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 29.02.2016 12:03, Paul Booker wrote: I can't find an explanation of the tweak prefixes. Do you know the difference between -\tweak ^\tweak and \tweak in the above script? It doesn't work without them! A direction modifier (- for ‘neutral’, ^ for ‘up’ or _ for ‘down’) is needed to mark a

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-29 Thread Paul Booker
> The markup part takes nearly no space at all and is placed behind the score: > > But I'm working with LP 2.19.30 and 2.19.25. > Maybe something has changed since those versions? > Hi Klaus, I don't really want to go

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Klaus Blum
Paul Booker wrote > All I would like now is to get the score markup back to the top of the > page > with the graphic visible behind it. Strange... in my examples I have this construction: \markup { \with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0) \translate #'(0 . -2) \line { etc...

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Paul Booker
> > I’m not having any problem with this, if I leave both grobs in the > default layer, or if StaffSymbol is _below_ BarLine. The whiteout on > BarLine seems to be too small to affect StaffSymbol – dunno why. > > HTH, Simon > Hi Simon, I don't have a problem there either. My primary thread

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 28.02.2016 20:10, Klaus Blum wrote: Simon Albrecht-2 wrote Please give an example of what exactly you can’t achieve. David suggested to whiteout the staff lines AND the barlines, but not the whole markup-score thing. I don't know how to do this without one covering the other. I’m not

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Klaus Blum
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > Please give an example of what exactly you > can’t achieve. David suggested to whiteout the staff lines AND the barlines, but not the whole markup-score thing. I don't know how to do this without one covering the other. %

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 28.02.2016 19:33, Klaus Blum wrote: Hmmm... I could use \override Score.BarLine.layer = #-1 \override Score.BarLine.whiteout = ##t to move the barline behind the staff lines. But if I want to whiteout the staff lines as well, that doesn't help anymore. Or is there a way to place

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Klaus Blum
Hi Simon, Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > That kind of problems can be overcome by overriding layer on the > competing objects. Hmmm... I could use \override Score.BarLine.layer = #-1 \override Score.BarLine.whiteout = ##t to move the barline behind the staff lines. But if I want to

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Klaus Blum
Paul Booker wrote > That doesn't work for me Ooops, I posted the wrong code... that was my first attempt. Here is my second one that was supposed to be shown here: % --- \version "2.19.36" samplePath = #'((moveto 0 0) (rcurveto

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 28.02.2016 18:31, Klaus Blum wrote: you could use \override Score.BarLine.whiteout = ##t but that would make the white "frame" around the barlines cover the staff lines. That kind of problems can be overcome by overriding layer on the competing objects. Best, Simon

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Paul Booker
Klaus Blum gmx.de> writes: > you could use > \override Score.BarLine.whiteout = ##t > but that would make the white "frame" around the barlines cover the staff > lines. > But as you wrap your score into a markup block, you can use the \whiteout > command for the entire score. Hi Klaus,

Re: Graphic background behind systems

2016-02-28 Thread Klaus Blum
Hi Paul, Paul Booker wrote > would it also be possible to have white-out on the barline and staff to > help it stand out? you could use \override Score.BarLine.whiteout = ##t but that would make the white "frame" around the barlines cover the staff lines. But as you wrap your score into