Hi all,
Today I decided to transcribe the Kilberry setting
for "The Desparate Battle". While I was working on that I created
a small piece of code that you may consider useful enough to
include in the next version of bagpipe.ly for the LilyPond world.
y, December 15, 2013 7:57 PM
Subject: Is there a way to tweak glissandos (glissandi)
Hi,
Long time no see.
I was rekindling my Lilypond skills with a set of Christmas carols and
stumbled upon a set of that are quite ugly quite. Is there a way to tweak them
e.g. by changing the Y off
Hi,
Long time no see.
I was rekindling my Lilypond skills with a set of Christmas carols and
stumbled upon a set of that are quite ugly quite. Is there a way to tweak
them e.g. by changing the Y offset of end points? I have understood that
the \shape and control-points are for Bezier based stuff
Ack well spotted, I could have stared at that all day without seeing the
superfluous bracket!
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Name-of-default-notehead-for-style-tweak-tp150746p150753.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
lt-notehead-for-style-tweak-tp150746p150751.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
It looks like default works
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/note-head-styles
You have a > too much:
<\tweak #'style #'default c a'>
If you want to revert for all notes, you can also use
\revert NoteHead #'style
Cheers,
Joram
Am 13.09.
Easy one this time! I'm using crosshead notes but I want to tweak one back to
the default blob, this is what I'm using:
<\tweak #'style #'default> c a'>
Obviously default is the wrong name because I get no notehead, so what is
it?
--
View this message in co
2013/8/21 Thomas Morley :
> Hi Dominic,
[...]
> Using 2.17.24 you'll see a padding/collision-issue even with the
> untweaked glissando.
> Probably a bug.
Issue 2942
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2942
-Harm
___
lilypond-user mailin
2013/8/21 Janek Warchoł :
> Hi,
>
> 2013/8/21 Dominic :
>> Hello all, sorry for the frequent posting
>
> No problem! I've noticed that you write excellent descriptive email
> subjects - that's very good (and that's why i looked at this email) :)
>
>> Here is a small example:
>> /\relative c' { 1 \
Hi,
2013/8/21 Dominic :
> Hello all, sorry for the frequent posting
No problem! I've noticed that you write excellent descriptive email
subjects - that's very good (and that's why i looked at this email) :)
> Here is a small example:
> /\relative c' { 1 \glissando 1 }/
>
> If I wanted to modify
relative c''' {
\once \override Glissando.extra-offset = #'(0 . -1)
1 \glissando 1
}
/ affects all of them (of course), as does:
/1 -\tweak extra-offset #'(0 . -1) \glissando 1/
/1 \glissando 1/
moves the note itself, but
/1 \glissando 1/
has no effect.
What is t
David Kastrup writes:
> Nick Payne writes:
>
>> I was trying to allocate a tweak command to a variable and eventually
>> managed to get it to work after finding what I needed by a search of
>> the lilypond-user archives (
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilyp
I was trying to allocate a tweak command to a variable and eventually
managed to get it to work after finding what I needed by a search of the
lilypond-user archives (
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-09/msg00279.html).
However, I was initially misled by the NR having a
Kevin Patrick Barry writes:
> Dear LilyPond users,
>
> I must admit I don't always understand the \tweak command, but I use
> it often to reposition objects here and there. As I understand it, it
> doesn't seem to work on markup objects attached to whole-bar rests.
Dear LilyPond users,
I must admit I don't always understand the \tweak command, but I use it
often to reposition objects here and there. As I understand it, it doesn't
seem to work on markup objects attached to whole-bar rests. I have
attached a tiny example below. The workaround
Just for reference:
If the 'Codemirror' online editor is being used for lilypond files, it
needs to have this line added to the sTeX mode file:
plugins["concat"] = addPluginPattern("concat", "tag", "[", ["atom"]);
after the "var plugins = new Array();" line
and the same applies for any lilypo
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
> Making music function calls like \tweak syntactically self-contained,
> meaning that you don't need to specifically mark them differently when
> using them on post-events rather than standalone expressions, is not
&
"Peter Gentry" writes:
> Doing a bit of study on the tweak command there is some apparent minor
> contradiction.
>
> The manual states categorically that the \tweak command must be
> preceeded by an articulation (often the "use default" articulation -
> is
Doing a bit of study on the tweak command there is some apparent minor
contradiction.
The manual states categorically that the \tweak command must be preceeded by an
articulation (often the "use default" articulation -
is used).
However many examples omit an articulation - is t
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Writing good docs is lots of hard work. Adapting it to a new input
>>> syntax, in contrast, dead easy. Most of the work will likely even be
>>> done
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Writing good docs is lots of hard work. Adapting it to a new input
>> syntax, in contrast, dead easy. Most of the work will likely even be
>> done by convert-ly.
>
> As long as GLISS changes only the /naming/ o
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Instead, it would make more sense if people opted to take care of
>>> something like a chapter at a time, or the relation between two
>>> chapters, and br
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Honestly? Our documentation was created in lots of little bits from
>> different contributors at different times. If we hope to bring it into
>> a reasonably more consistent state, discussing single lines and exam
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Honestly? Our documentation was created in lots of little bits from
> different contributors at different times. If we hope to bring it into
> a reasonably more consistent state, discussing single lines and examples
> is going to be ridicul
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2012/5/23 Janek Warchoł :
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>>> Very nice! Great work, David. A minor thing: In the given link I can
>>>> see
>>>>
>>>
2012/5/23 Janek Warchoł :
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>> Very nice! Great work, David. A minor thing: In the given link I can
>>> see
>>>
>>> \tweak layout-object #'grob-property value
&
> I am not sure this syntax is familiar to non-programmers: it might
> make people try using actual brackets. This is, after all, not the
> Extending LilyPond reference.
OK. Another possibility is specifying two lines:
\tweak layout-object #'grob-property value
\tweak #
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Very nice! Great work, David. A minor thing: In the given link I can
>> see
>>
>> \tweak layout-object #'grob-property value
>>
>> as the syntax line, mentioning that
t;> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/the-tweak-command>
>
> Very nice! Great work, David. A minor thing: In the given link I can
> see
>
> \tweak layout-object #'grob-property value
>
> as the syntax line, mentioning that `layout-object&#
ation/notation/the-tweak-command>
Very nice! Great work, David. A minor thing: In the given link I can
see
\tweak layout-object #'grob-property value
as the syntax line, mentioning that `layout-object' is optional.
Wouldn't it be betterto write this as
\tweak [layout-object
f reimplementing footnotes, an optional layout-object
>> argument for tweaks:
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/the-tweak-command>
>
> cool! i think i already have some cases where this will be useful!
>
>> Footnotes have gotten a
; argument for tweaks:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/the-tweak-command>
cool! i think i already have some cases where this will be useful!
> Footnotes have gotten a new interface. The documentation for this
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/n
Hi,
with regard to the latest development release (and 7th stable release
candidate), I wanted to point out a new feature that came in as a
side-effect of reimplementing footnotes, an optional layout-object
argument for tweaks:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/the-tweak
On Wed, 2 May 2012 16:40:02 + (UTC)
Klaus Föhl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sometimes when browsing LSR snippets I come across full page snippets,
> consisting mainly of empty space. While I do understand that
> -sometimes- one may need a whole page to demonstrate a specific
> feature, most times it
Hello,
Sometimes when browsing LSR snippets I come across full page snippets,
consisting mainly of empty space. While I do understand that
-sometimes- one may need a whole page to demonstrate a specific feature,
most times it looks like an oversight.
1) What makes some snippets being short and so
2011/9/22 David Kastrup
> You can take a look at the definition of tweak in
> ly/music-functions-init.ly and transplant the Scheme code directly into
> your function instead of using #{ #} for it.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
This way I guess:
\version "2.14.2"
gt;
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
> Thanks for the info!
You can take a look at the definition of tweak in
ly/music-functions-init.ly and transplant the Scheme code directly into
your function instead of using #{ #} for it.
--
David Kastrup
2011/9/22 David Kastrup
>
> The latter. This functionality of #{ ... #} has been implemented about
> a month ago in 2.15 and will see the light of a stable version first in
> 2.16.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
Thanks for the info!
Harm
___
lilypond-user
Thomas Morley writes:
> I tried your suggestion (without any changes), but it didn't compile.
>
> \version "2.14.2"
>
> notToBarline = #(define-music-function
> (parser location grb)
> (ly:music?)
> #{
> -\tweak #'to-barline ##f-$grb
&g
>
> >> notToBarline = #(define-music-function
> >> (parser location grb)
> >> (ly:music?)
> >> #{
> >> -\tweak #'to-barline ##f-$grb
> >> #})
> >>
> >> {
> >> c1-\notToBarline \< |
> >> d4\! % etc.
> &g
t; (parser location grb)
>> (ly:music?)
>> #{
>> -\tweak #'to-barline ##f-$grb
>> #})
>>
>> {
>> c1-\notToBarline \< |
>> d4\! % etc.
>> }
>
>> At the current point of time, you can put postevents into variables, but
>> music f
t; (parser location grb)
>> (ly:music?)
>> #{
>> -\tweak #'to-barline ##f-$grb
>> #})
>>
>> {
>> c1-\notToBarline \< |
>> d4\! % etc.
>> }
>
> Thanks for this answer.
> So IIUC the dash between the end of the tweak and the ly:music?
&
On 18 September 2011 00:43, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Use a music argument. This will, however, only work if the music
> function is recognizable as a postevent, namely as
>
> notToBarline = #(define-music-function
> (parser location grb)
> (ly:music?)
> #{
> -\
Xavier Scheuer writes:
> Hello,
>
> This is maybe a question I have already asked but I cannot find the
> answer (and I'm trying to typeset a score).
>
> I'd like to define a variable that actually consists of a tweak command.
> I.e. to replace
>
> c1-\tw
On 17 September 2011 23:58, harm6 wrote:
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> you can't put \tweak in variable.
>
> Try:
>
> crescTweak = #(let ((m (make-music 'CrescendoEvent
> 'span-direction -1)))
>(set! (ly:music-property m
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is maybe a question I have already asked but I cannot find the
> answer (and I'm trying to typeset a score).
>
> I'd like to define a variable that actually consists of a tweak command.
> I.e. to replace
>
>
Hello,
This is maybe a question I have already asked but I cannot find the
answer (and I'm trying to typeset a score).
I'd like to define a variable that actually consists of a tweak command.
I.e. to replace
c1-\tweak #'to-barline ##f \< | % it works
d4\! % etc.
by
Michael Käppler wrote Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:14 AM
I wrote a piece in 2/2 time, which I want to be beamed like it was
in 4/4.
So I did baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) but had an unexpected
result -
The beats 1 and 2 have their own beams, but 3 and 4 are beamed
together.
What am I m
Hi all,
I wrote a piece in 2/2 time, which I want to be beamed like it was in 4/4.
So I did baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) but had an unexpected result -
The beats 1 and 2 have their own beams, but 3 and 4 are beamed together.
What am I missing?
Regards,
Michael
_
2010/6/16 Jan A. Shullenberger :
> I am a neophyte Lilypond user. I understand how to use the TWEAK
> command to show a chord with 1 LARGE note and 1 SMALL note.
> How do I show 1 LARGE whole note with a SMALL quarter note + 2 eighth
> notes + 1 half note?
Hi!
You can no longer
Hi Jan,
> I am a neophyte Lilypond user. I understand how to use the TWEAK command to
> show
> a chord with 1 LARGE note and 1 SMALL note. How do I show 1 LARGE whole note
> with a SMALL quarter note + 2 eighth notes + 1 half note?
Can you send a scan/sketch of what you want?
Th
I am a neophyte Lilypond user. I understand how to use the TWEAK command to show
a chord with 1 LARGE note and 1 SMALL note. How do I show 1 LARGE whole note
with a SMALL quarter note + 2 eighth notes + 1 half note?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hello
Any easier/compacter way to do
d8 -\tweak #'X-offset #-6 -\tweak #'Y-offset #-2 -\mf
Thanks :)
ALberto
Alberto Simões
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Maybe it used to read -\tweak #'extra-offset #'(6.2 . -5.6)
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ion "2.13.0"
ta = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?)
#{
\context Voice << $x { s1 *0 -\tweak \once \override Script
#'extra-offset = #'(6.2 . -5.6) -- -> } >>
#})
{ \ta c''1 }
2009/6/27 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> Since I haven't found anything in the documentation and in the LSR, I created
> a sample snippet and posted it to the LSR:
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=609
>
> Can this snippet be added to the documentation about time signatures
> (currently, the only
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Reinhold,
This is essentially what
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'single-digit
does, except that with the single-digit style the number is
automatically
extracted from the time signature...
Wow... never seen that in the docs before!?
Very cool.
T
Hi Reinhold,
This is essentially what
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'single-digit
does, except that with the single-digit style the number is
automatically
extracted from the time signature...
Wow... never seen that in the docs before!?
Very cool.
Thanks,
Kieren.
_
Am Samstag, 27. Juni 2009 12:56:38 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> 2. If you *do* decide to mimic the MS, perhaps this is what you're
> looking for?
>
> \version "2.12.2"
>
> timeSigSnippet = \relative
> {
>\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'numbered
>\time 4/4 c d e f
>\overri
Am Samstag, 27. Juni 2009 12:56:28 schrieb Villum Sejersen:
> Sorry if my phrasing the question has been unsatisfactory.
>
> You have already seen the only relevant parts of my input-code:
>
> \time 6/4 ... \time 7/4 ... \time 3/4 ... \time 6/4 ... \time 7/4 ...
> \time 6/4 ...
What David actua
Hello Villum,
Trying to mimic the layout of the manuscript as far as possible in
the pdf I have come across a small problem:
Only the very first time signature shows the ordinary 6/4. All
subsequent time signatures are shown with a large number only,
spanning the whole system (no /4).
1.
really needed I might get permission from the now
80-year old composer to show it, but I don't think it is.
It is the visual output in the staff of the time setting commands I
wish to tweak to numbers around double size, in the same place as the
ordinary time signature, spanning the whole s
It would be easier for someone here to find the problem if you posted
your input code.
-David
Villum Sejersen wrote:
I am presently typesetting (version 2.13.2) a small SATB motet from the
composer's 23-years old original hand-written manuscript. As usual in
such cases finding out what was ac
I am presently typesetting (version 2.13.2) a small SATB motet from the
composer's 23-years old original hand-written manuscript. As usual in
such cases finding out what was actually written or meant is by itself
quite a challenge ;-)
The music goes: \time 6/4 (4 bars), \time 7/4, \time 3/4,
o big and
> too low on the base line.
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
>
>
Unfortunately, this is not an easy tweak, because there is no property in
the chord-name-interface that allows control of this (the chord-name
functionality of LilyPond is in need of a major rewrite; I hope to get to
Hello all,
Does anyone have suggestions for tweaking the position of accidental in
chord names. For example, the flat sign in in the chord name Ab? I
find in the default Lilypond setting the flat symbol is too big and
too low on the base line.
Thanks,
Jonathan
2009/4/25 Werner LEMBERG :
> Great! Please commit something along this.
Done.
I've changed it slightly so it matches the behaviour of \override,
setting the property even if there's no match.
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-us
>> I eventually noticed that I had accidentally typed
>>
>> -\tweak #'extra-ofset
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> -\tweak #'extra-offset
>>
>> but this did not generate any warning. Looks like this is a general
>> thing with \tweak, as I
2009/4/23 Nick Payne :
> I was trying to move a TextSpanner with \tweak and couldn't figure out why
> it wouldn't move. I eventually noticed that I had accidentally typed
>
> -\tweak #'extra-ofset
>
> instead of
>
> -\tweak #'extra-offset
>
> but
I was trying to move a TextSpanner with \tweak and couldn't figure out why
it wouldn't move. I eventually noticed that I had accidentally typed
-\tweak #'extra-ofset
instead of
-\tweak #'extra-offset
but this did not generate any warning. Looks like this is a general thi
2008/9/7 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry, Neil, it was negligent of me not also to say "thanks for fixing this
> bug"! Thanks! :)
Thank you. :)
It's unfortunate that you have to change your tweaks, but it's in the
nature of using extra-offset; it's blind to any bugfixes which change
s
Sorry, Neil, it was negligent of me not also to say "thanks for fixing
this bug"! Thanks! :)
Jon
Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Jon,
>
This is a result of my fix (#666) for the broken 'avoid-slur behaviour
when set to 'around (which is the case for Fingering).
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathank
ring).
If you have a look at the images below without tweaks, you can see
what's changed: originally, the `4' was avoiding the slur incorrectly
(outside), even though there's plenty of space for it to be placed
inside the slur. Since the correct behaviour places it inside, your
y-of
h there's plenty of space for it to be placed
inside the slur. Since the correct behaviour places it inside, your
y-offset in \tweak is now too large.
Regards,
Neil
<><>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
relative c {
\time 6/8
\clef "treble_8"
a8\( g'-\tweak #'extra-offset #'(-0.3 . -3.5)-3
\sfor c' \) |
}
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
<><>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gn
Thanks, it works nicely. And it was in the reference after all, but not
so clearly:
under spanner-interface:
minimum-length (dimension, in staff space)
Try to make a spanner at least this long, normally in the
horizontal direction. This requires an appropriate callback for the
springs-and
Hi, I would like to write a shortcut for short glissandos. Here is what
I have managed to make work for now:
% make next glissando as I want
shortgliss = #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
#{ \once \override Glissando #'thickness = #2
\once \override Glissando #'gap = #0.1
\once
Hi Eric,
On 23/03/2008, Papa Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I would like to write a shortcut for glissandos that appear too
> short. Here is what I have managed to make work so far:
>
> % make next glissando as I want
> shortgliss = #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
> #{ \on
Hi, I would like to write a shortcut for glissandos that appear too
short. Here is what I have managed to make work so far:
% make next glissando as I want
shortgliss = #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
#{ \once \override Glissando #'thickness = #2
\once \override Glissando #'gap
I wrote:
> try e.g.
> {
> c4-\tweak #'color #red -\prall
> }
>
but this works as well, of course :-)
{
\once \override Script #'color = #red
c4\prall
}
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
LilyKDE, LilyPond for KDE: http://lilykde.googlecode.com/
New in LilyK
Hi David
You almost have it right, but to color articulations you need to place a "-"
before the tweak, as it the \tweak were an articulation itself, like this:
\relative c'' {
c8
% B with red mordent
b -\tweak #'color #red \mordent
c
}
I don't think
,
>
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Objects-connected-to-the-input
>
> try e.g.
> {
> c4-\tweak #'color #red -\prall
> }
>
I have successfully all the notes of one voice, but this did not catch
the ornaments. It was interesting,
ad.articulation-type "mordent" = #darkred
>
> Lilypond complains about the "-type" and also complains about
> "-mordent", so that is not right, but I do not know where to go from
> here.
>
> Help on this would be appreciated,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/D
2008/2/6, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ah: sticking \hspace in the page number markup works:
Cool! Can you add it to the LSR?
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-use
his is almost impossible to address, but
> maybe one of the gurus might have a flash of telepathic insight ...
>
> QUESTION 2: Assuming I can't fix the root cause, does anyone have a way to
> tweak odd page numbers (but not even page numbes) by hand? Something like
> extra-offs
o address, but maybe one of
the gurus might have a flash of telepathic insight ...
QUESTION 2: Assuming I can't fix the root cause, does anyone have a way to
tweak odd page numbers (but not even page numbes) by hand? Something like
extra-offset for page numbers?
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTE
You can also include .eps files in a \markup, so one solution is to manually
produce an .eps file with the desired content using LaTeX, and then include
it in the \markup.
/Mats
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/9/3, Francois Planiol-Auger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is there a reverse way of lily
2007/9/3, Francois Planiol-Auger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there a reverse way of lilypond-book,
> I mean something to insert LaTeX-code in Lilypond-files like:
IIRC, this was possible several years ago, but the TeX backend has
been removed since 2.6 or 2.8. However, the \markup command itself is
Hi again and again,
Is there a reverse way of lilypond-book,
I mean something to insert LaTeX-code in Lilypond-files like:
... (notes)
c4..^\markup{
@latex {
begin{tabular}{cc}
winners & price \\
John smith & a copy of lilypond \\
Johny Haliday & a chocolate organ-pipe \\
\end{tabular}
@latex don
Am 2007-07-26 um 23:19 schrieb Adam Good:
I want to add something like a section of chapter to the Table of
Contents in my file without having it print in the pdf on that
page. If that sounds cryptic, here's what I do in LaTeX:
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Blah blah lah lah}
example from
Adam Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This may be a bit off-topic but I figure others here may be using
> ConTeXt to make books out of Lilypond files. I signed up for the
> ConTeXt mailing list a couple days ago but still need to get
> approved, impatient as always me.
>
> I bel
Hi everyone,
This may be a bit off-topic but I figure others here may be using
ConTeXt to make books out of Lilypond files. I signed up for the
ConTeXt mailing list a couple days ago but still need to get
approved, impatient as always me.
I believe I asked the same question about LaTeX a
Hi,
I seem to remember Han-Wen recently (in the last 6 weeks or so) adding
something somewhere that shortens trill spanners just the right amount
so that ...
\pitchedTrill c'4 \startTrillSpan d'
\pitchedTrill c'4 \stopTrillSpan \startTrillSpan d'
c'4
... comes out perfectly, with both trill
should I fill a feature request to have long dynamic indications (the textual part, not the dashed line one) automatically splitted to the next staff when the text goes out of the page ?
like this : http://img115.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lilypondfi4.pngbecause if I do the line break manually, wh
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Henrik Frisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I personally like the extra-offset property since it allows me to move
> > an object in any way with only one command. I would assume that 'padding'
> > and 'center-align' properties would also work.
>
> I h
Quoting Henrik Frisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I personally like the extra-offset property since it allows me to move
an object in any way with only one command. I would assume that 'padding'
and 'center-align' properties would also work.
I hope you know that there is an important difference between
yota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is such a dynamic indication a TextScript or a DynamicText or something else
> ?... I tried some tweaks but everything failed.
>
At the bottom of this page:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.9/Documentation/user/lilypond/Dynamics.html#Dynamics
I found the answer to yo
ok I got ityou're right... with a centered alignment, the dynamic indication become too imprecise to be readable. But putting the text on two lines give a nice result.\set crescendoText = \markup{\italic \column {\line {poco a poco} {cresc.} }}
\set crescendoSpanner = #'dashed-line
r4 \ti
yota wrote:
Hi,
I have some notes where a "poco a poco cresc." must be inserted...
so I put
\set crescendoText = \markup { \italic "poco a poco cresc." }
\set crescendoSpanner = #'dashed-line
r4 \times 2/3 { a8->( \accent \< bes a) \!} r4
and it worked, but the text is too long, it goes ov
tion keeps confusing me.
is such a dynamic indication a TextScript or a DynamicText or something else
?... I tried some tweaks but everything failed.
A quick example would be welcome
thx
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/tweak-of-the-crescendotext-tf2161916.html#a5974890
201 - 300 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
