Thank you for your explanation, and I can manage how I want now.
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Haipeng
Lily isn't wrong as there is no indication on grouping. 5/4 and 6/4 can be
grouped many ways is 5/4 2+3 3+2 1+4 etc. The same as 6/4 3+3 2+2+2 2+4
etc. Anyway I think sibelius just chose a default and you happened to want
that. Or, your some how indicated to it that is what you wanted. Any
;
> To: bobr...@centrum.is
> Cc: "lilypond-user"
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:43:26 AM
> Subject: Re: beaming problem
>
> On 5/29/15, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
> > Haipeng,
> >
> > There was no attachment.
> >
> > -David
> >
>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm now composing an orchestral work, in which there are plenty of
> >>
> >> meter changes such as 5/4 and 6/4. Since I'm blind, I gave part of it
> >> to a teacher, and he told me that the beaming in 5/4 and 6/4 is
> >> incorrect. He told me the beaming must be clear for
Hello,
Am 29.05.2015 um 11:42 schrieb Haipeng Hu:
Hello,
I'm now composing an orchestral work, in which there are plenty of
meter changes such as 5/4 and 6/4. Since I'm blind,
It’s so impressive that you are able to do this – write lilypond code,
read scm files etc. – without eyesight. Kudos
Haipeng,
There was no attachment.
-David
- Original Message -
> From: "Haipeng Hu"
> To: "lilypond-user"
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:42:31 AM
> Subject: beaming problem
>
> Hello,
> I'm now composing an orchestral work, in which t
Hello,
I'm now composing an orchestral work, in which there are plenty of
meter changes such as 5/4 and 6/4. Since I'm blind, I gave part of it
to a teacher, and he told me that the beaming in 5/4 and 6/4 is
incorrect. He told me the beaming must be clear for performance, so
5/4 must be 3/4+2/4,
,
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Shane Brandes > <mailto:sh...@grayskies.net>> wrote:
>> Wim,
>>
>> you are missing the open [ for the groupings in the bottomstaff.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Shane
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 28,
m,
>
> you are missing the open [ for the groupings in the bottomstaff.
>
> regards,
>
> Shane
>
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Wim van Dommelen <mailto:m...@wimvd.nl>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled on a small beaming problem. Attached two small .P
Wim,
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Shane Brandes wrote:
> Wim,
>
> you are missing the open [ for the groupings in the bottomstaff.
>
> regards,
>
> Shane
>
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I stumble
Wim,
you are missing the open [ for the groupings in the bottomstaff.
regards,
Shane
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled on a small beaming problem. Attached two small .PNG’s for what
> should be there (never mind the 7/4, that is
Hi,
I stumbled on a small beaming problem. Attached two small .PNG’s for what
should be there (never mind the 7/4, that is a writo), my experimental output
and below my compiling code as for what I tried. The problem is in the second
voice showing hickups in the second part of both measures
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> On 1/18/12 8:19 AM, "Ralph Palmer" wrote:
>
> >Greetings -
> >
> >I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP.
> >
> >\version "2.14.1"
>
> Your version says 2.14. 2.14 has different syntax.
>
> There is a snippet in the docs for 2.14
On 1/18/12 8:19 AM, "Ralph Palmer" wrote:
>Greetings -
>
>I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP.
>
>After checking the manual, especially 1.2.4 Beams : Setting automatic
>beam behavior, and the LSR, I still cannot get Lilypond to beam 8th notes
>in 3/4 time in 1/4 note groups. Grouping by
- Original Message -
From: "James"
To: "Ralph Palmer"
Cc: "lilypond-user Mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: auto-beaming problem
Ralph,
On 18 January 2012 15:19, Ralph Palmer wrote:
Greetings -
I'm running Lil
Ralph,
On 18 January 2012 15:19, Ralph Palmer wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP.
2.12? Your example is using a \version 2.14.
Is there a typo in your email?
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Greetings -
I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP.
After checking the manual, especially 1.2.4 Beams : Setting automatic beam
behavior, and the LSR, I still cannot get Lilypond to beam 8th notes in 3/4
time in 1/4 note groups. Grouping by quarter note is automatic for 16th
notes, but not for
On 12 October 2011 00:33, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> The latter is more difficult to define as automatic beam behavior and
> AFAIK impossible for now, since it is not possible (yet!) to define
> rules for subdivide beams.
OK, apparently the following settings work but I actualy do not
understand *
On 10 October 2011 01:18, Paul Malcolm wrote:
>
> I have the following (perhaps trivial) but interesting problem.
> I would like to manually set the beat length (for beaming purposes) inside
> a
> \times n/m {} construction.
> The music is 2/4 time and I need groupings of two sextuplets on the 1/4
I have the following (perhaps trivial) but interesting problem.
I would like to manually set the beat length (for beaming purposes) inside a
\times n/m {} construction.
The music is 2/4 time and I need groupings of two sextuplets on the 1/4 note
beat.
Ordinarily
\times 4/6 {c16 c c c c c
On 6/23/2011 11:31 AM, Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear community,
the following code works fine in 2.12.3. but doesn't in 2.14.1.
Is there a possibility to get it working in 2.14.1?
\version "2.14.1"
music = {
\clef bass r2 r4 r8 f,
r2 r4 g,8 r
r4 f, 8 r8 r2
}
beams = {
\repeat "unfold" 24 {
Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1706
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Thomas
To: lilypond-user
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 12:31 PM
Subject: beaming problem in 2.14
Dear community,
the following code works fine in 2.12.3
Dear community,
the following code works fine in 2.12.3. but doesn't in 2.14.1.
Is there a possibility to get it working in 2.14.1?
\version "2.14.1"
music = {
\clef bass r2 r4 r8 f,
r2 r4 g,8 r
r4 f, 8 r8 r2
}
beams = {
\repeat "unfold" 24 { s8[ s ] s[ s]} % this line causes the error!
- Original Message -
From: "flup2"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: Beaming problem introduced with 2.13.60
So do it here when running only that line. The problem is that, in a
longer
file (without changes from 2.13.33), here is what it looks li
about beam,
narrow bounds etc.).
http://old.nabble.com/file/p31440777/stem.jpg
No problem with these measures alone, but in a whole score, the problem
occurs
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Beaming-problem-introduced-with-2.13.60-tp31416244p31440777.html
Sent fr
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:01 AM, flup2 wrote:
>
> I had the same problem in a score with these notes :
>
> d4-- c8->( g ~ g) g'->( f e)
>
> I had no problem before 2.13.60
>
> Philippe
>
Your snippet compiles fine in the most recent development version.
Cheers,
MS
_
I had the same problem in a score with these notes :
d4-- c8->( g ~ g) g'->( f e)
I had no problem before 2.13.60
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Beaming-problem-introduced-with-2.13.60-tp31416244p31439163.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User m
The problem still exists with the \stemUp and \stemDown commands and the
first bar removed:
\version "2.13.60"
\language "english"
\relative c' {
\time 3/4
cs16 a'' a fs fs ef ef c c a fs( d) |
}
<>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-use
Example below demonstrates (a couple of bars taken from Bach's
chaconne). This problem did not exist in versions prior to 2.13.60:
%=
\version "2.13.60"
\language "english"
\relative c' {
\time 3/4
\key d \minor
\stemUp
d,16 bf''' bf gs gs f f d d b g
--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Neil Puttock wrote:
> From: Neil Puttock
> Subject: Re: Markup Causes Beaming Problem
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 10:38 PM
> 2009/9/5 Jonathan Wilkes :
>
> > Is this bug
2009/9/5 Jonathan Wilkes :
> Is this bug #430?
No, but it has been fixed recently. I'll backport it to the stable
version in a moment so it'll be included in 2.12.3.
> Also, what's the best way to make that slur in the bass clef look nice?
> It seems to be colliding with the accent mark and wit
Hello,
I think Lilypond is being a weirdo.
The second beam looks messed up to me (winxp sp3), but when I remove
the _"x" markup, the \p, or the slur in the treble clef, it clears up.
Is this bug #430?
Also, what's the best way to make that slur in the bass clef look nice?
It seems to be c
this post and reappears when I post
it or prewiew it. I am sorry, I also tried to attach a file but the list
rejects it.
Thank you,
Andrea
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Beaming-problem-tp17820561p17840581.html
Sent from the Gnu - L
Thank you, Mats.
Here is an instance of the file in which the beaming problem arises, they're
eight separate files, the last one containing the score:
%*Bwv1057_01_fl1.ly**
\version "2.10.33"
flautoa = \relat
There are a number of problems with the beaming that have existed for a
long time in
LilyPond. However, you are lucky, since several of these have been fixed
in the latest
development version, 2.11.49.
However, I'm confused that you see problems only in the score and not in
the parts.
Perhaps
lp,
Andrea
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Beaming-problem-tp17820561p17820561.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
the piano parts.
Trevor D
- Original Message -
From: "hhpmusic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lilypond-user"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 2:09 AM
Subject: beaming problem
Hi,
This is the opening of my capriccio for violin and piano. I use the easy
tuplet wr
code of how my beats fit together.
Hope this is a little help, but I gather I'm just babbling. :-)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:09:00 +0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
beaming problem
Hi,
This is the opening of my capriccio for violin and piano. I use the easy
tuplet writing
aps a beaming problem. Could
anyone tell me what's the matter?
Haipeng
\version "2.11.42"
#(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f)
\header {
tagline = ##f
title = \markup { \fontsize #2 "Capriccio For Violin And Piano" }
composer = \markup { \fontsize #3 \bo
Wow. I'm going to have to parse that syntax to see what it's doing. I think that using that method to beam will be less effort than just manually beaming.Thanks for all the advice, I really appreciate it.
~MattOn 9/12/06, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Neeman wrote:>> I think Mats
Joe Neeman wrote:
I think Mats may have misunderstood what you wanted. You want the
following beaming, yes?
a8[ r16 r8 a16] a8[ r16 r8 a16]
If so, I don't think the automatic-beaming can help you; I don't think
there is a way to tell it to ignore rests while making up beams.
Thanks for th
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 11:06 -0400, Matt Huber wrote:
> Hello all~
>
> I am attempting to write some music in 12/16 time. I would like the
> beaming to be in groups of six. In the following example, the first
> measure is beamed correctly, but the second is not. In the second
> measure, each 16t
Matt Huber wrote:
The first bar has the beams broken correctly (two groups of six). The
second bar is notes 1 and 6 of each group.
Exactly, and in the first bar, you get a new beam on the second beat,
i.e. before
the 7th 16th-note. The same thing happens in the second bar if you count
correc
The first bar has the beams broken correctly (two groups of six). The second bar is notes 1 and 6 of each group.I'm trying to write the drum score of a 2/4 march (rougly 82bpm). The feel of the piece is a triplet on each 8th note. I won't go into the dissertation on why, but it's easier and more
Are you really sure that you want beams across the
beats in the second measure? As a player, I would
find that much more confusing than the layout you
get now from LilyPond. Also, since you want to break
beams at the beat in the first bar, I don't see any way
to configure the auto-beaming to do
Hello all~I am attempting to write some music in 12/16 time. I would like the beaming to be in groups of six. In the following example, the first measure is beamed correctly, but the second is not. In the second measure, each 16th note should be beamed to the previous 8th note. Since these patt
Hello list, hello Sami,
You wrote:
> Try \set stemRightBeamCount and \set stemLeftBeamCount as in following
> example (beam-count.ly from Lilypond tips and tricks:
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html)
>
>
> fragment = \notes {
> #(override-auto-beam-set
Try \set stemRightBeamCount and \set stemLeftBeamCount as in following
example (beam-count.ly from Lilypond tips and tricks:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html)
fragment = \notes {
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4)
f32 g a b b a g f
f32
Hi,
my version is 2.2.0.
In a piece with \time 9/16 I need almost notes in the form
eight sixteenth eight sixteenth eight sixteenth ...
and so on.
A little example:
a8 ( e16 g8 f16 d'8 d,16
g8 d16 f8 e16 g8 f16 )
a8 ( g16 e'8 e,16 c'8 e,16 )
I'm using the automatic be
Thanks you got what I wanted!
I almost resorted to doing
\autoBeamOff cis8. \autoBeamOn a16 d8. a16 |
This works!
cis8.\noBeam a16 d8. a16 |
=) Joshua
=== At 2004-05-28, 04:20:57 you wrote: ===
>On Thursday 27 May 2004 17.59, you wrote:
>
>> well, it bega
Joshua Koo wrote:
1 last point is that i figure out how to play with midi2ly.
1 guess a very import thing is to specify the quantise note durations, if not the generated ly looks really horrible.
depending on the songs, 16 or 32 seems quite good.
then of course, rests will appear as spaces, so any
hi,
Thanks for your advice. I have to agree with you after finding I waste much time
trying (unsuccessfully) to convert extracts of midi with tons of triplets, rests and
dotted value notes.
However, midi2ly still has usefulness as it can convert software generated sequenced
midi (eg. maybe fin
On Thursday 27 May 2004 17.59, you wrote:
> well, it began as im tried to typeset some music for mutopia,
> so i came across this section of the code where i didnt seem to match
> lilypond output with the publishing style. it was some time ago, when my
> hdd burnt, then i stop using lilypond for s
hi all,
i thought i might had ask this question quite some time ago,
but maybe my mail wanst on the mailing list so i couldnt post,
or no one answered my question,
or i believed some did replied but i forgot all the advices u gave.
anyway using this mail should be no problem.
well, it began as im
Chris Lipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Chris,
> offbeats the resulting harmony between the two is a second.
Well, there lies the problem.
> This produces some very odd beaming results. I've attached a sample
> measure so you can see. Do you know a) if this is a bug and b) if
> there's a w
Hello,
I am currently working on a piece for concert band, and am setting it
using lilypond 1.4.11, under Red Hat Linux 7.2. In the score, I have
the first and second flute parts on the same line, and there's a part
where they are both playing an eighth note ostinato, and on the offbeats
the
56 matches
Mail list logo
