Could you start a new subject rather than replying to the Digest if you want
help?
Which operating system are you using?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Kale Good
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest,
Hello.
I am new to Lilypond. I am on Xubuntu 16.04 and installed the packages via
the default repositories. I am having a problem with the fonts used in the
score. I don't know if it is a Lilypond problem or a package missint or
something else. I tried looking in the manual, Google and etc, but di
Hello
i installed lilypond with cygwin on my winXP and are now able to use
lilypond
i can do really good sheets but i can't add text
i think there is a problem of font : the text is printed with some
dynamic letters (such as f or m or p)
so some letters are not printed ...
i even tried to gene
Hi,
Lily compiled from CVS branch 2_4 a couple of weeks ago
produces a perfect Postscipt file from the following
snippet:
\version "2.4.5"
\header {
title = "A"
}
\score {
\notemode { r4 }
}
However, the PDF looks like this (compacted manually):
<>
Or if the attachment doesn't get thro
I'm running lilypond on SuSE Linux 8.0.
Lilypond is version 1.4.10-87
When I process my files I get C clefs appearing instead of the tails
of quavers. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Anna
--
Anna Langley
London UK
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm running lilypond on SuSE Linux 8.0.
>
> Lilypond is version 1.4.10-87
>
> When I process my files I get C clefs appearing instead of the tails
> of quavers. Any suggestions?
Can you send us the output of ly2dvi or lilypond --verbose? Lilypond
should detect this
Thiago,
I removed the “%” and everything looked correct.
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Thiago Censi
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:50 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Font problem
Hello.
I am new to
Hi Thiago,
> I am new to Lilypond. I am on Xubuntu 16.04 and installed the packages via
> the default repositories. I am having a problem with the fonts used in the
> score. I don't know if it is a Lilypond problem or a package missint or
> something else. I tried looking in the manual, Google and
Hi, Mark.
I knew there was nothing wrong with the code itself, I wanted some
directions with the font problem. I sownloaded the liilypond file here:
http://eugenecormier.com/?p=157
And this is what it looks like after compiling on my system:
http://i.imgur.com/uZMzfZw.png
Michael, the actual
I have a clean
install, more or less, just LilyPond, Frescobaldi, Latex, and Inkscape. Hope
this helps!
This is what your test looks like on my XFCE:
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n196797/xfce.png>
(sorry the attachment didn't work the way I wanted it to!)
---
change your original sample code to e.g.
title = \markup { \fontsize #-20 "Test" }
you can see that the "T" is about the right size. But then the kerning
is scaled down and thus completely of.
> I suspect it is a PDF/font problem (though it also happens with PNG, but I
&g
Hi!
Maybe you can try installing de development version (2.19.*).
El 16/11/2016 8:51 p. m., "Thiago Censi" escribió:
> Hello.
>
> I am new to Lilypond. I am on Xubuntu 16.04 and installed the packages via
> the default repositories. I am having a problem with the fonts used in the
> score. I do
Hello,
Still for my song. The full orchestral score has finished yesterday, but I
don't know how to override the font of Lyrics. It seems that LyricText can't
accept #'font-name, and though I used #"仿宋_GB2312" For the Chinese texts, Lily
still says the warning for not knowing how to embed t
Hello everyone,
I'm running Debian testing, doing weekly updates. I think I miss a text
font or the font used by Lilypond 2.4.5 can't be found because my
Lilypond output looks really bad. Example here:
http://hit.tweakdsl.nl/blues_up_the_neck.pdf. Anybody with the same
problem, or better, the
Very strange, I haven't seen that problem reported earlier.
Lyrics certainly work well for me in WinXP.
Exactly which version of LilyPond did you install?
/Mats
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Hello
i installed lilypond with cygwin on my winXP and are now able to use
lilypond
i can do really good
Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Very strange, I haven't seen that problem reported earlier.
Lyrics certainly work well for me in WinXP.
Exactly which version of LilyPond did you install?
/Mats
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Hello
i installed lilypond with cygwin on my winXP and are now able to use
lily
Once you get your basic font setup working, don't forget to save
your .ly file using UTF-8 encoding instead of Latin 1 (ISO 8859-1).
However, this doesn't explain the problems you show in your example.
/Mats
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Very strange, I haven't seen that
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
my version is 2.6.4 i send an example from the lilypond.org website
http://membres.lycos.fr/cocatpe/Schubert.ly
http://membres.lycos.fr/cocatpe/Schubert.pdf
can you check whether 2.6.3 does work for you?
http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/mingw/lilypond-2.6.3-1.exe
Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
my version is 2.6.4 i send an example from the lilypond.org website
http://membres.lycos.fr/cocatpe/Schubert.ly
http://membres.lycos.fr/cocatpe/Schubert.pdf
can you check whether 2.6.3 does work for you?
http://lilypond.org/download/binar
You didn't say earlier that you used the Cygwin installation.
I would recommend the non-Cygwin "native" Windows package
available at lilypond.org/web/install/, unless you have any specific
reason to work in Cygwin.
/Mats
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
Maxime Brugidou wro
Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
You didn't say earlier that you used the Cygwin installation.
I would recommend the non-Cygwin "native" Windows package
available at lilypond.org/web/install/, unless you have any specific
reason to work in Cygwin.
/Mats
I wrote :
>>Hello
>>i installed lilypond with
Maxime Brugidou a écrit :
I wrote :
>>Hello
>>i installed lilypond with cygwin on my winXP and are now able to use
lilypond
but ok, i'm trying to use it the non-cygwin package, but i got an error :
"Pange-ERROR **: file
/var/fred/cvs/savannah/lilypond/installers/windows/mingw/src/pango-1.8.1
I'm not sure I understand exactly what you tried. If I understand you
correctly, the problems you reported first with missing font symbols
for text fonts, was when you tried the Cygwin installation. Right?
Then, you tried the non-cygwin version and got the error message
you included below, right?
Using Lily 2.6.4 with Cygwin
I have problems with new font system. If I do not specify anything, the
output is Sans-Serif. If I try to specify what is in the doc to have Roman
output, i.e.
#(define fonts
(make-pango-font-tree
"Times New Roman" "Helvetica" "Courier"
(/ mySta
I am a new user to Lilypond, and can't get the titles or footers to
appear correctly in the PDF output. Instead, it displays a series
of "r"s and "p"s and commas. Even the Lilypond tagline at the
bottom appears this way. I am using Windows. Did I install
some font file incorrectly? Thanks for
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/14591/
> Notice the ugly clef and the title.
>
> I used the 1.0.12 version of ec-fonts-mftraced. Living on
> Debian Woody has its quirks concerning updmap, but I did
> my best. Any hints where the
Did you build the ec-fonts-mftraced yourself? I would guess so,
since you have problems both with the feta fonts in LilyPond and
the ec-font used for the title.
In that case, it must be something wrong with your mftrace (or
some of the programs it uses).
If you want to verify that a certain font fi
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you build the ec-fonts-mftraced yourself? I would guess so,
> since you have problems both with the feta fonts in LilyPond and
> the ec-font used for the title.
You guessed wrong. ec-fonts-mftraced is from the Lilypond
download site.
> If you wan
OK, what happens if you do
ps2pdf testfont.ps
and view the resulting PDF file?
If the PS file looks OK, then I would definitely suspect your
Ghostscript (which is the program doing the job in ps2pdf).
Do you get the same problem both when viewing the PDF on screen
and when you print it on paper? Co
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, what happens if you do
> ps2pdf testfont.ps
> and view the resulting PDF file?
I can see the ugly treble clef again.
> If the PS file looks OK, then I would definitely suspect
> your Ghostscript (which is the program doing the job in
> ps2pdf).
S
this sounds like a font-path problem.
source the file lilypond-profile in $LILYSRC/buildscripts/ or add those
contents of lilypond-profile permanently to your .bash_profile.
(i think -- at least that works for me)
hope this helps. greetings from the alps,
simon.
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 00:42, A
> I'm running lilypond on SuSE Linux 8.0.
>
> Lilypond is version 1.4.10-87
>
> When I process my files I get C clefs appearing instead of the tails
> of quavers. Any suggestions?
You have probably used a different Lilypond version before.
Please read what the README or INSTALL file for Lilyp
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 00:23, Han-Wen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I'm running lilypond on SuSE Linux 8.0.
> >
> > Lilypond is version 1.4.10-87
> >
> > When I process my files I get C clefs appearing instead of the
> > tails of quavers. Any suggestions?
>
> Can you send us the outpu
> On Wednesday 31 July 2002 00:23, Han-Wen wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > I'm running lilypond on SuSE Linux 8.0.
> > >
> > > Lilypond is version 1.4.10-87
> > >
> > > When I process my files I get C clefs appearing instead of the
> > > tails of quavers. Any suggestions?
> >
> > Can y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Lilypond is version 1.4.10-87
> > >
> > > When I process my files I get C clefs appearing instead of the
> > > tails of quavers. Any suggestions?
> >
> > Can you send us the output of ly2dvi or lilypond --verbose?
> > Lilypond should detect this problem (which alre
If I run the DVI from ly2dvi through dvipdfm, the fonts are correct. The
catch (Of course!) is that the noteheads don't look as good. It
complains about some missing specials, and it wouldn't surprise me in
the least if the two are related.
___
Lilypo
I don't know how you're trying to change the font, but LyricText
supports font-interface, which has font-name as a user-settable
property. Remember that for lyrics, you have to have a space on both
sides of the period, i.e.: \override LyricText . font-name
On 09.11.2008, at 03:24, 胡海鹏 Hu Hai
Hallo
I noticed a strange problem (version: windows 2.7.7) while trying to change
some fonts in a markup.
\override #'(font-name . "binnerd" )
works fine, but
\override #'(font-name . "minion regular" )
Comes out with the default(?) font.
Both are regular installed and well-working (ttf) font
I would really recommend you to upgrade to the latest stable version,
2.6.4.
Unfortunately, it's not included in the Debian archive, but you can use
the installation package at www.lilypond.org which should work on
almost any Linux.
If you want to stick to 2.4.5, it looks to me as if you have so
Hello Mats,
ec-fonts-mftraced is installed and the texhash command didn't help. Will
try 2.6 tonight. Thanks sofar.
Hans
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I would really recommend you to upgrade to the latest stable version,
2.6.4.
Unfortunately, it's not included in the Debian archive, but you can us
Hello again,
The autopackage worked and 2.6.4 solved the font problem. Thanks. I only
wonder how I am going to remove the installation when Debian catches up.
Later.
Cheers,
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello Mats,
ec-fonts-mftraced is installed and the texhash command didn't help.
Wil
Permission
denied: "blues_up_the_neck.ps"
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello again,
The autopackage worked and 2.6.4 solved the font problem. Thanks. I
only wonder how I am going to remove the installation when Debian
catches up. Later.
Cheers,
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello Mats,
e autopackage worked and 2.6.4 solved the font problem. Thanks. I
only wonder how I am going to remove the installation when Debian
catches up. Later.
Cheers,
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello Mats,
ec-fonts-mftraced is installed and the texhash command didn't help.
Will try 2.6 tonight. T
blues_up_the_neck.ps"
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello again,
The autopackage worked and 2.6.4 solved the font problem. Thanks. I
only wonder how I am going to remove the installation when Debian
catches up. Later.
Cheers,
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello Mats,
ec-fonts-mftraced is installe
What version of LilyPond did you install?
Also, what Windows version do you have?
(Please answer to the mailing list)
/Mats
Quoting Matthew Leerberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am a new user to Lilypond, and can't get the titles or footers to appear
correctly in the PDF output. Instead, it displ
Hi Mats, et al.,
I really appreciate your response. In trying to respond to your
question, I realized that in trying to fix the problem myself, I had
actually uninstalled LilyPond, and was instead producing the scores
with Cygwin bash.exe. I had originally had the same problem when
only using Li
If you download the latest stable version, 2.8.3, from the Downloads
page at www.lilypond.org, there is no need to use Cygwin.
/Mats
Quoting Matthew Leerberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Mats, et al.,
I really appreciate your response. In trying to respond to your question, I
realized that in t
hello,
I have to say first I'm a beginner, even if I already had some good
result on lilypond 2.2.
I installed lilypond 2.3.13 on Mac OSX
and I think it works , the only (big) problem is all the text fonts
are now huge and mixed up on the resulting pdf file; only the ps file
has correct font p
Hi:
I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
under Linux. I've read the compilation instructions, and aside from a
small problem with espgs, everything seemed to go well.
I automatically source lilypond-profile when I log in, so that's not the
problem. I also run t
Hi gang - Just reinstall debian on my system (I was flirting with FBSD
5.1). Lilypond 1.8.0 (apt-geted from unstable) works great, except that
pdfs have font weirdness in the heading. Compare the attached dvi and
pdf. I've attached the ly source as well.
% Generated automatically by: lilypond-boo
Hi list,
I have just updated my sheet music archive to LilyPond 2.24.0. It went
well, but I am seeing a strange font encoding problem.
I have installed LilyPond on a Mac M1 running MacOS 13.1 with Homebrew
which builds from source using Guile 3.0.
Running this code
\version "2.24.0"
\markup \l
Hi.
> On 28 Aug 2023, at 11:36, David F. wrote:
>
> I am experiencing a very weird problem with Lilypond on macOS 13 Ventura.
> When using the Times New Roman font, the capital letter N is mis-printed.
>
I can confirm and replicate this under 13.4.1
> I do not think that my Times New Roman
>> I am experiencing a very weird problem with Lilypond on macOS 13
>> Ventura. When using the Times New Roman font, the capital letter N
>> is mis-printed.
Have a look at the thread starting at
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2022-12/msg00349.html
which discusses a very s
>>> I do not think that my Times New Roman font is corrupted.
>
> Actually, I think it is: Most likely the font's 'post' table is
> broken (i.e., it has a wrong PostScript name for glyph 'N').
> Normally, you won't see the problem at all because most applications
> access a font's 'cmap' table (
> Jean did the analysis then, he can tell more.
D'oh, *I* did the analysis then :-)
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6508
Werner
> You might try to copy the affected font from macOS 14 to macOS 13 and
> check whether it works.
This bug has already been fixed in Homebrew. Please just uninstall and
reinstall LilyPond and it should go away.
Jean
> Le 28 août 2023 à 08:45, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
>
>
>
>> You might try to copy the affected font from macOS 14 to macOS 13 and
>> check whether it works.
>
>
> This bug has already been fixed in Homebrew. Please just uninstall and
> reinstall LilyPond and it should go away.
Whoops,
> On 28 Aug 2023, at 08:49, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
>
>> Le 28 août 2023 à 08:45, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>> You might try to copy the affected font from macOS 14 to macOS 13 and
>>> check whether it works.
>>
>>
>> This bug has already been fixed in Homebrew. Please ju
> On Aug 27, 2023, at 11:55 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>
I do not think that my Times New Roman font is corrupted.
>>
>> Actually, I think it is: Most likely the font's 'post' table is
>> broken (i.e., it has a wrong PostScript name for glyph 'N').
>> Normally, you won't see the problem at
>\override #'(font-name . "binnerd" )
>works fine, but
>\override #'(font-name . "minion regular" )
>comes out with the default(?) font.
Under Windows, I think you have to use the filename of the font
(without the ".TTF" suffix), not the friendly-fontname.
In my Windows/FONTS dire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under Windows, I think you have to use the filename of the font
(without the ".TTF" suffix), not the friendly-fontname.
This is easy to check. Someone running cygwin should just report the
names that fc-list prints.
Maybe lilypond should come with its own version of
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Maybe lilypond should come with its own version of fc-list, so everyone
> can check out the names for the fonts installed. This feature is
> eligible for sponsoring.
Well, for what it's worth, in Windows 98 you can find font files -- click
Start --> Find --> Files or Fol
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> Maybe lilypond should come with its own version of fc-list
fc-list is already included in the Windows distribution.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
___
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 4:40 AM
To: Georg Dummer
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Yet another font problem
>\override #'(font-name . "binnerd" )
>works fine, but
>\overr
Georg Dummer writes:
> What's about fc-list Han-Wen mentioned? I have one in my cygwin environment
> but not in my Lilypond Win-native.
If you have cygwin installed, you should be able to install the native
version of fc-list from the fontconfig package using min-apt:
PATH="/cygdrive/c/Progr
opia:style=Regular
Bitstream Charter:style=Bold
-Original Message-
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 10:43 AM
To: Georg Dummer
Cc: lilypond-user; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Yet another font problem
Georg Dummer writes:
> What's abo
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Georg Dummer writes:
What's about fc-list Han-Wen mentioned? I have one in my cygwin environment
but not in my Lilypond Win-native.
If you have cygwin installed, you should be able to install the native
version of fc-list from the fontconfig package using min-apt:
Georg Dummer writes:
> As I said fc-list is installed
Which fc-list? This looks a lot like cygwin's which is useless
(unless maybe you set
FONTCONFIG_FILE=/cygdrive/c/.../LilyPond/usr/etc/fonts.conf)
> (the whole fontconfig package respectively)
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> Just tried it over here and got:
[snip]
> wget: not found
Please install wget and try again?
Also set FONTCONFIG_FILE to what lilypond prints when using
LILYPOND_VERBOSE=1.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Mats Bengtsson writes:
Just tried it over here and got:
[snip]
wget: not found
Sorry, missed that one!
Please install wget and try again?
Also set FONTCONFIG_FILE to what lilypond prints when using
LILYPOND_VERBOSE=1.
Maybe I shouldn't bother too much si
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
Maybe lilypond should come with its own version of fc-list
fc-list is already included in the Windows distribution.
It's easy to duplicate the fc-list functionality within LilyPond. If we
do it this way, we can add it as a proper feature.
Hi there - having heard good things about Lilypond and needing to typeset for
SATB, I thought I'd give it a go.
However I cannot get lyrics working - using the following code (taken from the
lyrics tutorial):
<<
\relative {
r4 c \times 2/3 { f g g }
Hi All,
When compiling lilypond 2.3.9 or 2.3.10 from source, everything compiles
fine, but when I run the program, I get the following error:
Parsing...
Interpreting music... error: can't find `feta20.afm'
Music font has not been installed properly. Aborting
The font was traced properly and doe
On 9-Dec-04, at 6:40 AM, Paul Crabbe wrote:
I installed lilypond 2.3.13 on Mac OSX
Please upgrade to stable lilypond in fink (it's 2.4.2, IIRC)
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypo
BTW, you may have to do a fink selfupdate. I missed that step and kept
wondering why the Fink distribution was so far behind the current
version. :)
On Dec 9, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On 9-Dec-04, at 6:40 AM, Paul Crabbe wrote:
I installed lilypond 2.3.13 on Mac OSX
Please upgra
Le 9 déc. 04, à 21:41, Graham Percival a écrit :
On 9-Dec-04, at 6:40 AM, Paul Crabbe wrote:
I installed lilypond 2.3.13 on Mac OSX
Please upgrade to stable lilypond in fink (it's 2.4.2, IIRC)
Cheers,
- Graham
&
> BTW, you may have to do a fink selfupdate. I missed that step...
that was it! I did
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:51:50AM -0800, Doug Asherman wrote:
> I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
> under Linux. I've read the compilation instructions, and aside from a
> small problem with espgs, everything seemed to go well.
For the OpenBSD port (to be an
Doug Asherman writes:
> I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
> The problem I'm seeing is that the generated .ps and .pdf files have no
> fonts except for the notes and associated stuff like time signatures,
> etc. But I'm not seeing title, composer, rehearsal m
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Doug Asherman writes:
I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
The problem I'm seeing is that the generated .ps and .pdf files have no
fonts except for the notes and associated stuff like
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>> Doug Asherman writes:
>>
>>> I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
>>
<<< Stuff deleted -- >>>
>>
> Any more news?
>
> I'm trying to install 2.4.5 on S
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
>>There is a problem with the ec-fonts-mftraced package, it is not
>>tetex-3.0 compatible. Bertalan made manual fixes for cygwin,
>>but there is no autodetection yet.
>>
> Any more news?
Yes, ec-fonts-mftraced v1.0.12 is tetex-3.0 compatible.
> I'm trying to install
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
There is a problem with the ec-fonts-mftraced package, it is not
tetex-3.0 compatible. Bertalan made manual fixes for cygwin,
but there is no autodetection yet.
Any more news?
Yes, ec-fonts-mf
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
> "ec-fonts-mftraced is not installed" - except "rpm -U" fails with
> "already installed".
Try to reinstall ec-fonts-mftraced or run mktexlsr by hand.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
"ec-fonts-mftraced is not installed" - except "rpm -U" fails with
"already installed".
Try to reinstall ec-fonts-mftraced or run mktexlsr by hand.
This is *linux*. "rpm -U" fails, "rpm --instal
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
> This is *linux*. "rpm -U" fails, "rpm --install" fails ... and why
> should I expect it to make any difference?
TeX may have been updated, and there's a postinstall script.
> Unfortunately, mktexlsr doesn't make any difference either.
The check that configure does
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
This is *linux*. "rpm -U" fails, "rpm --install" fails ... and why
should I expect it to make any difference?
TeX may have been updated, and there's a postinstall script.
Unfortunately, mktexls
Hi Jan and all,
now I typeset a couple LaTeX documents with dvips -Ppdf, and now I can't make
any more Lilypond pdfs (if I do, I get no noteheads). I get the following
messages:
amelie@amy:~/music/gospelchor > dvips -Ppdf charleston_alley.dvi
This is dvips(k) 5.86 Copyright 1999 Radical Eye So
A) Environment:
a) Lilypond 1.6.5, Cygwin installation, using
'install now' from web site, replacing existing version (1.4.2?) on a
Windows 98 SE system.
b) Using Notepad to input a (German) song - 1 voice
and piano. Entering words with german umlauts. Targetting 'letter'
paper.
c)
I'm running Lilypond 1.6.6, installed from rpm, on a Red Hat 8.0
system. (Two of them, actually, and they're both doing the same thing).
When I run xdvi on the dvi output, it looks fine, but the .ps and .pdf
are bad.
I have:
* Uninstalled and reinstalled the package. (There seems to be a bug in
t
Tyler Eaves writes:
> Hi gang - Just reinstall debian on my system (I was flirting with FBSD
> 5.1). Lilypond 1.8.0 (apt-geted from unstable) works great, except that
> pdfs have font weirdness in the heading. Compare the attached dvi and
> pdf. I've attached the ly source as well.
Both look fin
Hi,
Your .pdf looks bad on my Debian SID system
as well. Upon regenerating the .pdf from the source
using lilypond, it looks perfectly normal on my system.
In addition your .pdf is about 25% larger than the
one my system generates. How did you generate the .pdf?
Best regards,
Stefaan
___
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 17:50, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Your .pdf looks bad on my Debian SID system
> as well. Upon regenerating the .pdf from the source
> using lilypond, it looks perfectly normal on my system.
>
> In addition your .pdf is about 25% larger than the
> one my system generates.
Le 31/12/2022 à 14:56, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
Hi list,
I have just updated my sheet music archive to LilyPond 2.24.0. It went
well, but I am seeing a strange font encoding problem.
I have installed LilyPond on a Mac M1 running MacOS 13.1 with Homebrew
which builds from source using Guile 3.
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 16:33, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 31/12/2022 à 14:56, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I have just updated my sheet music archive to LilyPond 2.24.0. It went
> > well, but I am seeing a strange font encoding problem.
> >
> > I have installed LilyPond on a Mac M
Le 31/12/2022 à 17:11, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 16:33, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le 31/12/2022 à 14:56, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> I have just updated my sheet music archive to LilyPond 2.24.0.
It went
> well, but I am seeing a strange fo
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 17:39, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> Le 31/12/2022 à 17:11, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> > On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 16:33, Jean Abou Samra
> wrote:
> >
> > Le 31/12/2022 à 14:56, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > I have just updated my sheet musi
Le 31/12/2022 à 18:23, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
I sent the font file to you privately.
Thanks, I opened
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6508
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 02/01/2023 à 14:31, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 31/12/2022 à 18:23, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
I sent the font file to you privately.
Thanks, I opened
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6508
It was diagnosed as a bug in the font (!), not in LilyPond.
OpenPGP_signature
Descri
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 16:11, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 02/01/2023 à 14:31, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
> > Le 31/12/2022 à 18:23, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> >> I sent the font file to you privately.
> >
> > Thanks, I opened
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6508
>
>
> It was di
>> It was diagnosed as a bug in the font (!), not in LilyPond.
>
> Yes, I saw the issue. That's extraordinarily weird.
It's not.
> It is one of the fonts installed with Microsoft Office so maybe this
> should be reported to Microsoft.
Newer versions of this font have it fixed. For example, 'Ti
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
