MING TSANG wrote:
Thank you.
How about lilypond v2.14.2 or v2.15.14?
The architecture has not changed.
--
Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com
Providenza Boekelheide, Inc.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi, lily users:
A general question. Can lilypond and jedit be installed in an USB thumb drive?
What would happen about the PATH?
Blessing,
Ming.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
El 22/10/2011 14:57, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com escribió:
Hi, lily users:
A general question. Can lilypond and jedit be installed in an USB thumb
drive? What would happen about the PATH?
Which operative system are we talking about?
___
lilypond
Subject: Re: lilypond and jedit
El 22/10/2011 14:57, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com escribió:
Hi, lily users:
A general question. Can lilypond and jedit be installed in an USB thumb
drive? What would happen about the PATH?
Which operative system are we talking about
: Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com
To: MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org;
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 12:27:56 PM
Subject: Re: lilypond and jedit
El 22/10/2011 14:57, MING TSANG tsan
-user@gnu.org
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 1:43:32 PM
Subject: Re: lilypond and jedit
yes, you can just copy java and jedit to it and change jedit.bat to
use the javaw.exe from the usb drive. Also set jedit to install
plugins to the application directory.
On 10/22/11
: lilypond and jedit
yes, you can just copy java and jedit to it and change jedit.bat to
use the javaw.exe from the usb drive. Also set jedit to install
plugins to the application directory.
On 10/22/11, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote:
Sorry! It is window 7
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
If everything is based on the existence of a given directory, then all
is clear. I believed that the registry had something to do.
No, it only checks for the dir:
Mark Austin wrote:
2009/10/10 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net:
Mark Austin wrote:
Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond
for
a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert
to
the new version, I got this error from Lilypond
It clearly shows I think, that there is nothing wrong with the pretty
name GNU LilyPond (yes, without the ugly underscore), but the nsis
script should be written to use LilyPond and not the ugly GNU_LilyPond
as installation folder.
Though I very strongly object to having the meaningless,
Valentin Villenave wrote Saturday, October 10, 2009 9:59 PM
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Trevor Daniels
t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
I installed both Neil's and Graham's 2.13.4 releases under
Windows Vista and
AFAICR the default directory was LilyPond as usual. I certainly
didn't
change
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed.
This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under
Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's what
I misunderstood. Thanks Valentin.
No, I installed 2.13.4 on both XP and
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed.
This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under
Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's
what
I misunderstood.
Hello,
I had the same problem and changed the directory in JEdit. If it is
reversed to only Liliypond, I hope someone will write it in this list.
Has the installation descripition in the documentation been changed?
However, it seems the default directory name is actually picked
up from the
2009/10/11 Hajo Dezelski dl1...@googlemail.com:
Could be, but as far as I remember it is recommended, that you
uninstall the old version before you install the knew one.
It is not only recommended, you can not install the new version
without previously uninstalling the old one, because the
Francisco Vila wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 3:54 PM
2009/10/11 Hajo Dezelski dl1...@googlemail.com:
Could be, but as far as I remember it is recommended, that you
uninstall the old version before you install the knew one.
It is not only recommended, you can not install the new version
2009/10/11 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
You don't need to uninstall; rename works
fine if you want to keep the previous around.
I didn't know that the installer could be fooled that easy. I rather
remember the opposite: the installer refusing to cooperate even after
having uninstalled
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed.
This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under
Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 7:42 PM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer-
changed.
This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install
under
Windows.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep
old versions readily to hand. This seems to be the difference
between our
On 2009-10-11, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep
old versions readily to hand. This
On 2009-10-11, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On 2009-10-11, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
wrote:
I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
And here is a patch to revert the change.
This is similar to the patch I posted earlier -- except that yours does work :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
From 2dbcd7705dcfaa93eedf9df8eb50616d4503a885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Francisco Vila wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:12 PM
2009/10/11 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
You don't need to uninstall; rename works
fine if you want to keep the previous around.
I didn't know that the installer could be fooled that easy. I
rather
remember the opposite: the
Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for
a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to
the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool:
convert-ly.py --edit C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks
Files\Folklore\Mumming
Mark Austin wrote:
Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for
a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to
the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool:
convert-ly.py --edit C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks
Files\Folklore\Mumming
2009/10/10 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net:
Mark Austin wrote:
Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for
a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to
the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool:
convert-ly.py --edit
Mark Austin wrote:
2009/10/10 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net:
Mark Austin wrote:
Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for
a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to
the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool:
Have these files moved or something?
The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond
and not C:\Program Files\LilyPond...
Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP
installed in GNU_IMP?
Why people always have the temptation to break things that
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
lilypondt...@organum.hu wrote:
The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and
not C:\Program Files\LilyPond...
Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP installed
in GNU_IMP?
Why
2009/10/10 Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com:
Actually, I first noticed it with Neil's temporary 2.13.4 mingw build,
back in July. I can't find any trace of this pretty_name change on
Jan's Github repo, I assume it's just some temporary whimsical idea
from either Graham or Neil :-)
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
lilypondt...@organum.hu wrote:
Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP installed
in GNU_IMP?
Why people always have the temptation to
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Patch appreciated, since we're such OMG stupid idiots to fix stuff
ourselves.
I'd have sent a patch if I knew where the mao the code is :-)
Oh wait, I just found it. Patch attached.
... in fact, rather than
-
From: Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com
To: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
I installed both Neil's and Graham's 2.13.4 releases under Windows Vista and
AFAICR the default directory was LilyPond as usual. I certainly didn't
change anything and they went into a directory named Program
After installation of the newest version of both Lilypond (2.10.0) and the
Lilypond Tool for Jedit (2.10.2) on my XP machine I have the problem, that
point-and-click doesn't work. It opens a new (empty) tab in my Firefox
browser instead of jumping into the editor.
I looked into Bertalan Fodor's
version of both Lilypond (2.10.0) and the
Lilypond Tool for Jedit (2.10.2) on my XP machine I have the problem, that
point-and-click doesn't work. It opens a new (empty) tab in my Firefox
browser instead of jumping into the editor.
I looked into Bertalan Fodor's (excellent) demo of the tool but still
window should not open Firefox but jump to jEdit.
2. Go to UtilitiesGlobal optionsDocking and set LilyPond instant help
as Top.
Please report if you succeed.
Bert
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-and-jedit-tf2912465.html#a8139039
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond
This may be because you have a space in the file path. Put your lilypond
files in paths without a space. So avoid c:\documents and settings if
possible.
At the end of the week there will be a fix for this.
uunail írta:
The action I described was happening in the Adobe PDF view. In the Adobe
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-and-jedit-tf2912465.html#a8139614
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Thank you for the information. I installed Java 5.0 according to your suggestion.
However I did not yet have success. On starting jEdit I get the following error message:
Cannot start java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: lilytool/LilyToolPlugin (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0). Try
the Gnu - Lilypond - User
http://www.nabble.com/Running-Lilypond-through-jEdit-in-Windows-t450088.html#a1443492
forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
Thank you once again.
Indeed jEdit didn't start the correct java version.
After uninstallation of both java versions and jEdit I then installed java 5.0 and afterwards jEdit.
Now everything works fine.
Uwe
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
from the zip. If you get error
messages (when starting jEdit), please let me know.
Also note that if you'd like to keep with 0.2.8, it must have been
unzipped into c:\jedit (because it already contains the jars folder).
However, the new 0.2.9 must be unzipped into c:\jedit\jars.
Bert
.
Is there any way you can help me? I'm using the native windows versions of both Lilypond and jEdit.
Best regards
Uwe
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
like trying to use the
new version of the tool.
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fodor Bertalan
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 1:11 AM
To: anders stenberg
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE:Running Lilypond through jEdit
Hi!
I did folow the procedure outlined by Bertalan Fodor in vol 35 issue 56.
When loading the lilytool 0.2.8-6 all I get is an Error message:
Cannot start: java.lang. Unsuported ClassVersionError,
Lilytool/lilytool.jar:
(Unsuported major.minor version 49.0 ) try uploading to a newer version
You need Java 5.0 (aka 1.5) for this version (and now on). I know this
is sad for Mac users, but I would not have had enough motivation to
work on LilyPondTool if I must stay with 1.4
Bert
anders stenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] írta:
Hi!
I did folow the procedure outlined by Bertalan Fodor in
Hello friends,
I have installed jEdit with Lilypond Tools in
Windows ME. Besides that, I have installed the native version for Windows (not
Cygwin) of Lilypond 2.6.3. How can I run Lilypond from its menu in jEdit? Is it
possible I tried configuring the plugin giving the right path
Yes, you're really right. I still not have uploaded the new, 2.6.x
compatible LilyPondTool to the jEdit plugin central.
I promise that on Thursday I will do that.
Until that you can download manually:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lily4jedit/lily4jedit-0.2.8-6.zip?download
Unzip its
50 matches
Mail list logo
