Re: WARNING: SPAM / MALWARE being sent to list members

Thus said Jean Abou Samra on Mon, 23 Oct 2023 19:53:25 +0200: > Let's not get into a debate about this on the list. We can discuss it > privately if you like. Not worth debating. I was hoping that whatever is generating spam in response to list posts would send me something. Andy

Re: WARNING: SPAM / MALWARE being sent to list members

Thus said Jean Abou Samra on Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:28:12 +0200: > Luckily, we have technologies (SPF and DKIM) that can guarantee an > email is sent from the owner of the sender address, and if an email > doesn't pass SPF/DKIM, it's very likely to be blocked by your spam

Re: WARNING: SPAM / MALWARE being sent to list members

> Le 23 oct. 2023 à 19:33, Andy Bradford > a écrit : > > Unfortunately SPF and DKIM are terrible hacks and wholly unnecessary. Let's not get into a debate about this on the list. We can discuss it privately if you like.

Re: WARNING: SPAM / MALWARE being sent to list members

I've just received a similar email, purporting to be from Michael Werner in response to my recent posting on the list, but actually from a bogus email address. It seems that lilypond-user is being targetted by emails of the form: From: Well Known lilypond user To: Your Own address used

Re: WARNING: SPAM / MALWARE being sent to list members

u believe it has been hacked. Luckily, we have technologies (SPF and DKIM) that can guarantee an email is sent from the owner of the sender address, and if an email doesn't pass SPF/DKIM, it's very likely to be blocked by your spam filter. But this is still possible. A fortiori, if you receive

Re: WARNING: SPAM / MALWARE being sent to list members

ere did the \header number go? > > Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:15:20 -0600 > > From: Panix > > To: r...@panix.com > > > >   > >   > > Check document: SPAM LINK REMOVED > > > > On 8/20/2023 11:35 AM, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > >

WARNING: SPAM / MALWARE being sent to list members

number go? Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:15:20 -0600 From:Panix To: r...@panix.com Check document: SPAM LINK REMOVED On 8/20/2023 11:35 AM, Jean Abou Samra wrote: Le dimanche 20 août 2023 à 10:54 -0400, Rik Kabel a écrit : Hello list, I have a few pieces

Re: ****SPAM:5.7**** Re: skip of defined length in lyrics?

David, thanks for this. I had abandoned the melismaBusy method, as it was throwing up all sorts of artefacts (blank bars and partially-blank bars, etc.) when applied in a polyphonic setting. And the fixes for parts starting with rests were beginning to make the source file rather

Re: [Spam] RE: Clef change placement

Thanks Aaron, great example! JM > Le 4 févr. 2020 à 06:05, Aaron Hill a écrit : > > On 2020-02-03 1:54 pm, Rutger Hofman wrote: >> I would also welcome this feature. How difficult is it to write a >> [Scheme] engraver? > > The mechanics of defining and using a Scheme engraver are relatively

Re: [Spam] RE: Clef change placement

On 2020-02-03 1:54 pm, Rutger Hofman wrote: I would also welcome this feature. How difficult is it to write a [Scheme] engraver? The mechanics of defining and using a Scheme engraver are relatively simple: \version "2.19.83" Custom_engraver = #(lambda (context) ;; The let block can

Re: [Spam] RE: Clef change placement

I would also welcome this feature. How difficult is it to write a [Scheme] engraver? Rutger On 2/2/20 6:55 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote: -Original Message- From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca] Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2020 11:15 AM To: Daniel Rosen Cc:

RE: [SPAM] Re: Score Wizard Fresco 3.1

On 02.01.20 13:19, Peter Gentry wrote: > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:31:10 -0700 (MST) > From: Michael Rivers > > The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows > version). I uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose > score wizard works fine. >

Re: [Spam] Notes or chords sustained with a pedal

Hi Robert, I use trickery: 1) with a shortened first note duration to stop the first tie 2) with hidden notes to get ties to start/stop at a time I want \version "2.21.0" % By Nick Payne. Hide notes etc but also avoid (invisible) collisions. transOn = { \override NoteColumn.ignore-collision

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

Aaron Hill writes: > On 2019-12-13 3:54 am, David Kastrup wrote: >> Peter writes: >>> A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ? >>> significant? >> It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font >> layout >> of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

> pango-font.cc emits the warning with %0X, so that U+ number is in > hex. BTW, I've now slightly adjusted the warning message in git to make LilyPond emit 'U+0092' instead of 'U+92' – the 'U+' notation should return at least four uppercase hex digits. Werner

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

On 2019-12-13 3:54 am, David Kastrup wrote: Peter writes: A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ? significant? It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font layout of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but nevertheless this seems strange.

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

Please do not take discussions off the list without bothering to announce it. Resent, this time with list included. Peter writes: > Yes I did manually change using the Fresco snippet but only after the > problem in order to put all the files on the current version number. I > appreciate that

GAH!! Apologies for the prior spam post - Lyric placement or new staff for ending.

All, Trying to finish this piece and it's giving me fits. With Tyler's help I got the Solo lyrics where I wanted them. Thanks, Tyler. But doing this and adding appropriate dynamics for \voiceTwo results in this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/z6176sqk913xa45/LPExample_LyricsSpacingIssue.png?dl=0

Apologies for the prior spam post - Lyric placement or new staff for ending.

All, Trying to finish this piece and it's giving me fits. With Tyler's help I got the Solo lyrics where I wanted them. Thanks, Tyler. But doing this and adding appropriate dynamics for \voiceTwo results in this: Note the lyric placement in measures 63-64 for the top staff. These lyrics

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Fri 14 Dec 2018 at 17:32:59 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote: > I was so disappointed with the complete mess the current abc2ly makes of > Irish tunes from the vast repository at thesession.org that I started > looking into this. The others mentioned that using abc2xml and then using > musixxml2ly

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Laura, I was so disappointed with the complete mess the current abc2ly makes of Irish tunes from the vast repository at thesession.org that I started looking into this. The others mentioned that using abc2xml and then using musixxml2ly supplied with lilypond is the way forward. I found this to

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

> "Andrew" == Andrew Bernard writes: Andrew> I had such poor results with abc2ly just recently that I Andrew> can't imagine there is any user base using it in earnest, or Andrew> even at all, else there would be lots of complaints. Or Andrew> perhaps I was doing something

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:21:44 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > It sounds reasonable to drop the current abc2ly implementation. However, > I think we shouldn't do this without somehow including abc2xml in the > distribution and (probably) create a wrapper script abc2ly that > transparently replaces

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Urs, I had such poor results with abc2ly just recently that I can't imagine there is any user base using it in earnest, or even at all, else there would be lots of complaints. Or perhaps I was doing something wrong. I feel that it does not deserve a place in the stable. I think instead of

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Am 10.12.18 um 12:18 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Hi Rutger, this is great. But I think you mean this page: https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/abc2xml.html [Took me a while to figure that out.] I conclude it's not worth spending any energy on lilypond abc2ly. Sounds like it should even be dropped,

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Rutger, this is great. But I think you mean this page: https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/abc2xml.html [Took me a while to figure that out.] I conclude it's not worth spending any energy on lilypond abc2ly. Sounds like it should even be dropped, and perhaps the NR could day how to achieve ABC to

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Rutger Hofman wrote: Isn't it possible (and easy) to use Wim Vree's utility abc2xml, see https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/xml2abc.html to convert to MusicXML and then convert the MusicXML into lilypond? From a maintenance/engineering view, it is much preferable to have

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On 10-12-18 10:40, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Johan, Having recently become interested in Irish Traditional Music where there are countless tens of thousands of tunes in ABC, the de facto standard for the tradition, I'd be keen to see abc2ly brought up to date. My tests with it on a sample of

Re: [Spam] Re: Partcombine not working for orchestral parts?

On 7/20/2018 9:41 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: On 16-07-18 17:29, Ben wrote: On 7/13/2018 2:25 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Ben, I probably confused you with my wording, sorry! I just meant it's above the staff when it's supposed to be (in rare situations where dynamics are technically

Re: [Spam] Re: Partcombine not working for orchestral parts?

On 16-07-18 17:29, Ben wrote: On 7/13/2018 2:25 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Ben, I probably confused you with my wording, sorry! I just meant it's above the staff when it's supposed to be (in rare situations where dynamics are technically different between the same instrument

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On 2018-06-15 13:39, David Kastrup wrote: Karlin High writes: On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

Karlin High writes: > On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! >> Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. > > The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or > something? I think the term is

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or something? -- Karlin High Missouri, USA

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

David Sumbler writes: > On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 21:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: >> On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote: >> > >> > I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals >> > Reference, >> > and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) .  But I have no idea what >> > these

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 21:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals > > Reference, > > and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) .  But I have no idea what > > these > > values represent.  Can you

Re: {SPAM 04.0} Re: Strange warnings

On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:36 -0400, Ben wrote: > On 5/25/2018 2:58 PM, David Sumbler wrote: > > I did eventually solve the problem, thanks to an off-list nudge > > from > > Joe Davenport.  I had some text spanners in a \global variable, > > which > > was not a good idea when some of the staves are

Re: {SPAM 04.0} Re: Strange warnings

On 5/25/2018 2:58 PM, David Sumbler wrote: On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 19:23 +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: Le 25/05/2018 à 17:42, David Sumbler a écrit : The only thing I have managed to establish is that it seems to be related to the 1st violins and cellos, which have staves arranged thus:

Re: {SPAM 04.0} Re: Strange warnings

On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 19:23 +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Le 25/05/2018 à 17:42, David Sumbler a écrit : > > > > > > The only thing I have managed to establish is that it seems to be > > related to the 1st violins and cellos, which have staves arranged > > thus: > >   << > >    

Re: {SPAM 04.7} Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

David Sumbler writes: > The automatic creation of contexts is obviously very useful, especially > when one is just a beginner at Lilypond.  But I almost wish that there > were an option to turn it off, which would be useful for forcing > oneself to understand how this all

Re: {SPAM 04.7} Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 23:55 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > It seems that if, in a > > <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> > > passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music > > before > > the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: It seems that if, in a <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music before the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterwards will all be treated as belonging to the same voice.  Is that correct? Have

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 18:43 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler: > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > > > \new Staff { > >    \time 6/8 > >    << > >  { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 > >    R2. | r4. e'''~ } > >

Re: [Spam] Partcombine with rests

Rutger, So: add \partcombineApart before bar 2 in either of your voices. You can revert in two ways: (1) \undo \partcombineApart (2) \partcombineAutomatic Ah, stupid me! I only tried \once \partcombineApart which didn't work. (I don't understand much of Lilypond's internals so can't tell

Re: [Spam] Partcombine with rests

Rutger Hofman writes: > On 20-04-18 08:46, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: >> Folks, >> >> in the following example >> >> \version "2.19.80" >> >> One = \relative d'' { >>   R1 >>   r8 d4 e8 f4 >> } >> >> Two = \relative g' { >>   R1 >>   r4 e4 d2 >> } >> >> \new Staff

Re: [Spam] Partcombine with rests

On 20-04-18 08:46, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Folks, in the following example \version "2.19.80" One = \relative d'' {   R1   r8 d4 e8 f4 } Two = \relative g' {   R1   r4 e4 d2 } \new Staff \partcombine \One \Two As the docs state, the decision about which partcombiner mode to choose

Re: {SPAM 02.4} Re: Repeating \markup commands

Am 08.04.2018 um 20:13 schrieb David Sumbler: \version "2.19.81" nar = ^\markup \whiteout \pad-markup #2 \etc Unfortunately the above produces "syntax error, unexpected \etc" The older version works fine. That’s because that’s a very recent change that hasn’t been released yet so “\version

Re: {SPAM 02.4} Re: Repeating \markup commands

David Sumbler writes: > On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 16:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> David Sumbler writes: >> >> > >> > The piece I am setting has a narrator.  For the score I have worked >> > out >> > a way of adding the narrator's short speeches over

Re: {SPAM 02.4} Re: Repeating \markup commands

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 16:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > David Sumbler writes: > > > > > The piece I am setting has a narrator.  For the score I have worked > > out > > a way of adding the narrator's short speeches over the music which > > gives the appearance I want. > >

Re: [Spam] partcombine bug when using quoteDuring?

On 02/19/2018 08:09 PM, Nathan Sprangers wrote: When both voices in \partcombine finish a \quoteDuring at the same time, only one voice is rendered for subsequent notes. \version "2.18.2" \addQuote "melody" \relative c'' {   a4 a a a   d d d d } \addQuote "alto" \relative c'{   f2 f   g2

Re: [Suspected Spam] about arabic.ly and hel_arabic_makam.ly

> On 19 Jul 2017, at 17:18, hassan.elfat...@free.fr wrote: > I carried out hel_arabic_makam.ly in 2013, while basing myself on makam.ly The file makam.ly does not transpose correctly, cf. the thread [1]. It is possible to typeset correctly in other ETs, for example E53, cf. [2] for Arabic

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

On 4-5-2017 23:29, Simon Albrecht wrote: Am 04.05.2017 um 22:20 schrieb Partitura Organum: I have linux running as an app on my tablet, That sounds great – how does one do that? Best, Simon I use an app called "Linux Deploy" for that. That app installs Linux and is later used to run the

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

Am 04.05.2017 um 22:20 schrieb Partitura Organum: I have linux running as an app on my tablet, That sounds great – how does one do that? Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

On 4-5-2017 22:11, Rutger Hofman wrote: Just out of curiosity, what did you do to get lilypond running on Android? Rutger Hofman Amsterdam I cheated a bit: I have linux running as an app on my tablet, and I run Lilypond inside linux. That version of Linux only has 2.18.2 as a prepackaged

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

On 05/04/2017 10:01 PM, Partitura Organum wrote: [snip] However, I'd like a working solution for version 2.18.2. That's the only version I have working on my android tablet and I use both my desktop and my tablet for engraving. Thanks for the suggestion, anyway. Regards, Auke Just out of

Re: [Spam] Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 12:34 +0200, Rutger Hofman wrote: > On 04/13/2017 03:37 PM, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:19 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At the moment I cannot really see how to deal with this sort of > > > >

Re: [Spam] Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

On 04/13/2017 03:37 PM, David Sumbler wrote: On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:19 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi David, At the moment I cannot really see how to deal with this sort of problem, other than having completely separate input for the score and the part at these points, controlled by

Re: [Spam] Re: Crescendo in the first beat misaligned to the others

Hello Son, I guess at your problem because I am not sure I grasp it. You are worried that the dynamics avoid the bar numbers from bar 2 on, is that right? Well, lilypond places the dynamics in a way that collisions are avoided, and the dynamics are treated independently of each other (with

Re: [Spam] Change beam grouping

On 03/03/2017 09:10 AM, Sven Axelsson wrote: Hi list. I asked this very question way back in 2011. Time to raise it again, maybe there is a way to do it now. The original thread is here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-09/msg00208.html This is probably in the manual, but

Re: {SPAM 01.0} Re: Changing the form of a whole-bar rest

On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 15:40 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message -  > From: "Simon Albrecht" > To: ; > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 3:23 PM > Subject: Re: Changing the form of a whole-bar rest > > > > > >

Re: [Spam] request for help: huge score

Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-11-23 12:33 GMT+01:00 Rutger Hofman : >> You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It is >> here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under the list >> of parts, there is a zip

Re: [Spam] request for help: huge score

2016-11-23 12:33 GMT+01:00 Rutger Hofman : > You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It is > here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under the list > of parts, there is a zip with the source, with a Makefile to build score and > all

Re: [Spam] request for help: huge score

You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It is here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under the list of parts, there is a zip with the source, with a Makefile to build score and all parts (make -j should work). (This is also a nice test if I

Re: [Spam] Photoscore

Somewhat more affordable is PDFToMusic Pro. It takes a PDF with music fonts (so not scans) and exports to MusicXML; it ought to be more reliable than the OMR that recognizes scans. It runs under Wine (at least the trial did). Rutger On 11/22/2016 11:13 AM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi List,

Re: [Spam] [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

2016-10-20 15:24 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan : > Hi David, > >>> accel, rit, a tempo, etc in a close >>> sequence, but obviously tied to their start times, and all at the same >>> vertical offset. For individual, more time-compressed, parts (e.g. the >>> woodwind

Re: [Spam] [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

Hi David, >> accel, rit, a tempo, etc in a close >> sequence, but obviously tied to their start times, and all at the same >> vertical offset. For individual, more time-compressed, parts (e.g. the >> woodwind parts that start out with rests!), I need to explicitly avoid >> the instructions

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

Rutger Hofman writes: > Even though I solved my problem: you asked above for my use-case, and > in this case it is the Adagio for solo violin and 13 winds from Alban > Berg's Kammerkonzert, see > http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) for the score. The > Adagio

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On 10/17/2016 06:49 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, which is targeted

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

Rutger Hofman writes: > P.S. Building lilypond on my (up-to-date-ish but certainly not > killer-class) PC take some minutes, not those tens of hours that the > list spoke about lately. Do you want to volunteer for building our distributions and installers then? I suspect that

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: >> Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, >> which is targeted at the developers I guess. >> >> The

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: >> Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, >> which is targeted at the developers I guess. >> >> The

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: > Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, > which is targeted at the developers I guess. > > The behaviour I am after is a thing I really do want: it is visually > confusing if the 'a

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear whenpadded

- Original Message - From: "Rutger Hofman" <rut...@cs.vu.nl> To: "lilypond-user" <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:26 PM Subject: Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear whenpadded P.S. Buildin

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, which is targeted at the developers I guess. The behaviour I am after is a thing I really do want: it is visually confusing if the 'a tempo' comes halfway the 'poco rit.)' when it is clearly meant to be after it. I

Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Rutger Hofman wrote: > On 10/12/2016 06:17 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, David Nalesnik >> wrote: >>> >>> Harm, >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Thomas Morley

Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Rutger Hofman wrote: > On 10/12/2016 03:53 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: >> That being said, the following adjusted definition of spanners should do >> it: >> >> spanners = { >> s2*7 | >> s4 >> \override

Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On 10/12/2016 06:17 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: Harm, On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: in this thread

Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On 10/12/2016 03:53 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: Harm, On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: in this thread

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

2016-05-07 21:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : >>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1036 > I'll let it unapproved for few more days in case somebody comes up > with further suggestions. > > Thanks a lot for review., > Harm Approved. Cheers, Harm

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On 2016-05-11 10:41, Chris Yate wrote: > There's no point having passwords that you can't remember; In fact, there is: no one can force you to divulge a password that you don't know. Which is why I have started using Keepass with a Yubikey. The Yubikey contains a password that I certainly

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On 11/05/2016, 6:41 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Chris Yate" wrote: There's no point having passwords that you can't remember I never buy this argument. You can have strong passwords that you can

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On Wed, 11 May 2016 at 08:39 Johan Vromans wrote: > > There are a few websites that > > provide strong password generators that make pretty much uncrackable > > passwords. > > Password Security: https://xkcd.com/936/ ;-) There's no point having passwords that you can't

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On Wed, 11 May 2016 11:30:51 +1000 Andrew Bernard wrote: > There are a few websites that > provide strong password generators that make pretty much uncrackable > passwords. Being paranoid, I'd never use an arbitrary 3rd party web site for this. There are many open

Re: sorry for the spam

On 11/05/16 03:30, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > a way in to your email account has been found, generally through a password > attack. The main advice I can give is to replace all > your mail account passwords with very strong passwords that are not readily cracked. > Although it can be annoying

Re: sorry for the spam

On 11/05/2016, 4:05 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of MarcM" wrote: >I am sorry but i am not sending those messages. Someone accessed my gmail >account, took the contacts and is spoofing my email address. > >I

Re: sorry for the spam

il of mouries.net is handled by Google you should set a > SPF record in your domain DNS panel to authorize only google: > https://support.google.com/a/answer/33786 > > If set, when somebody spoofs your email address, the message will be marked > as spam by servers who check the SPF rec

Re: sorry for the spam

On 10/05/2016 20:55, Federico Bruni wrote: The message was sent from nabble, so I guess that someone stole the password to log in there (not your gmail password). Try updating the password on nabble.com Does nabble hide (or partially obscure) email addresses like google groups does? If not,

Re: sorry for the spam

On 10/05/2016 19:05, MarcM wrote: I am sorry but i am not sending those messages. Someone accessed my gmail account, took the contacts and is spoofing my email address. I received an email of insults from Cynthia Karl which really is not necessary. I secured my gmail account

Re: sorry for the spam

le you should set a SPF record in your domain DNS panel to authorize only google: https://support.google.com/a/answer/33786 If set, when somebody spoofs your email address, the message will be marked as spam by servers who check the SPF record. I think... I received an email of insults from C

Re: sorry for the spam

I am sorry but i am not sending those messages. Someone accessed my gmail account, took the contacts and is spoofing my email address. I received an email of insults from Cynthia Karl which really is not necessary. I secured my gmail account but it's apparently not enough.

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

2016-05-07 15:17 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik : > Hi Harm, > > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Thomas Morley > wrote: >> 2016-05-07 10:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Gentry : >> >>> Could I sugeest that the range data is input in

Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

[involving the group again] On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Peter Gentry wrote: > Yes I meant input the page number data as data to the procedure rather than > in the procedure it self > I think it's better to read the settings from the \paper variable as

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

Hi Harm, On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-05-07 10:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Gentry : > >> Could I sugeest that the range data is input in the individual music file >> rather than the procedure so that the procedure

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

2016-05-07 10:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Gentry : > Could I sugeest that the range data is input in the individual music file > rather than the procedure so that the procedure remains > unchanged for any arrangement of page ranges. It should be a minor addition > that

Re: Spam u don't like

I got five copies of the spam. Indeed every copy was last sent from MarcM ... On 04.03.2016 11:46, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Hi Peter, It looks like MarcM's email has been haked. Pierre 2016-03-04 11:25 GMT+01:00 Peter Gentry <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk <mailto:pet

Re: Spam u don't like

gen...@sunscales.co.uk> writes: > > > How did potential malware links get into the list, it hasn't happend > > before? If its not spam then the poster should be less cryptic > > or he won't get anyone interested. > > Spam sent with a spoofed address from a list participant.

Re: Spam u don't like

Hi Peter, It looks like MarcM's email has been haked. Pierre 2016-03-04 11:25 GMT+01:00 Peter Gentry <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk>: > How did potential malware links get into the list, it hasn't happend > before? If its not spam then the poster should be less cryptic or he won't

Re: Spam u don't like

"Peter Gentry" <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk> writes: > How did potential malware links get into the list, it hasn't happend > before? If its not spam then the poster should be less cryptic > or he won't get anyone interested. Spam sent with a spoofed addres

Spam u don't like

How did potential malware links get into the list, it hasn't happend before? If its not spam then the poster should be less cryptic or he won't get anyone interested. regards Peter Gentry ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: [SPAM] Re: Tweaking in scheme

Peter Gentry peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk writes: -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] One can also try to do this kind of iteration oneself in order to only use the less invasive tweaks and get the color covered: \version 2.19.22 tweakIV =

Re: [SPAM] Re: Tweaking in scheme

David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Peter Gentry peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk writes: -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] One can also try to do this kind of iteration oneself in order to only use the less invasive tweaks and get the color covered: \version

  1   2   3   >