Noeck writes:
>> However I haven't found any variant of this that works.
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> this works for me:
>
>
> \version "2.19.36"
>
> stable = \tweak #'color #red \etc
>
> {
> a \stable b
> }
The 2.18 equivalent is
stable =
#(define-music-function (parser location
> However I haven't found any variant of this that works.
Hi Jim,
this works for me:
\version "2.19.36"
stable = \tweak #'color #red \etc
{
a \stable b
}
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
ng Turkish improvisations, and I'm
colorizing "stable" notes to help visualize the structure of the
improvisation. What I have in mid is setting a variable such as
stable = \tweak color #red
so that in the score I can simply precede a note name with
\stable
However I haven
menelikke <antfont...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi
>
> does anybody knows if and how is possibile to use a variable within
> "make-pango-font-tree" function, please?
>
> I'm using
>
> \version "2.18.2" % necessary for upgrading to future
Hi
does anybody knows if and how is possibile to use a variable within
"make-pango-font-tree" function, please?
I'm using
\version "2.18.2" % necessary for upgrading to future LilyPond versions.
\include "global.ly"
\paper {
#(define fonts
(
2016-04-28 14:05 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de>:
> On 28.04.2016 11:52, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>>
>> Dear Harm,
>>
>> some weeks ago replying to me, you used a variable name syntax that I
>> didn't know:
>>
>>> mynote.7 = ...
t;
>> Dear Harm,
>>
>> some weeks ago replying to me, you used a variable name syntax that I
>> didn't know:
>>
>>> mynote.7 = .
>>
>> I see the compiler didn't complain and having the possibility to use
>> number in the variable name would b
On 28.04.2016 11:52, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
Dear Harm,
some weeks ago replying to me, you used a variable name syntax that I
didn't know:
mynote.7 = .
I see the compiler didn't complain and having the possibility to use
number in the variable name would be very practical (at least for me
Dear Harm,
some weeks ago replying to me, you used a variable name syntax that I
didn't know:
> mynote.7 = .
I see the compiler didn't complain and having the possibility to use
number in the variable name would be very practical (at least for me).
But is it a "standard programmi
Dear Cynthia,
thank you for your help!
What you propose works correctly but it is not practical. I use tag to
avoid duplicating code so it is crucial to be able to do not create
two different variables music_screenOut and music_midiOut.
Thank you, g.
\score
> > {
> > \keepWithTag #'screenOut \music
> > \layout {}
> > }
> >
> > \score
> > {
> > \keepWithTag #'midiOut \music
> > \layout {}
> > \midi {}
> > }
> >
> >
> > In the attached captur
> On Apr 27, 2016, at 3:57 AM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:56:53 +0200
> From: Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>
> Subject: duration using variable
>
> In the previous example the cC variable contains a
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 13:02 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham King writes:
>
> > perhaps try:
> > \scaleDurations 2/1 { \cC }
>
> Doesn't change the visuals.
>
Sorry. More haste, less speed. I meant \shiftDurations. It might
require other things to be
d the second using midiOut.
>
> * * *
>
> Now I would like to be able to increase the lenght of the musical expression
> contained in the cC variable.
>
> In the previous example the cC variable contains a quarter note (and a
> quarter bichord) and I would like to change it to an ha
Graham King writes:
> perhaps try:
> \scaleDurations 2/1 { \cC }
Doesn't change the visuals.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
perhaps try:
\scaleDurations 2/1 { \cC }
hth
-- Graham
>
>
> Now I would like to be able to increase the lenght of the musical
> expression contained in the cC variable.
>
>
> In the previous example the cC variable contains a quarter note (and a
> quarter b
different output, the first
when using screenOut and the second using midiOut.
* * *
Now I would like to be able to increase the lenght of the musical
expression contained in the cC variable.
In the previous example the cC variable contains a quarter note (and a
quarter bichord) and I woul
On 19/04/2016 21:55, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-04/msg00465.html
... But it's recursive.
what does that mean? - J.W.
Recursion: See "Recursion".
To take the violin example,
violin = \new Staff {
\relative {
a'4 b c b
}
}
Thomas, it works fantastically well!
> So why? I don't see any advantage.
I'm writing a kind of library to write accordion music. Let me finish the
work and then I will post it here so that others can take advantage of it
(I hope so) and/or suggest a better way to do it.
Thanks again!
g.
2016-04-20 10:34 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com>:
> To generate the dominant seventh chord of c we use
>
> \chordmode {c:7}
>
>
> Does exist any way to make the same thing but starting from a variable
> containing a note?
>
> Something like th
To generate the dominant seventh chord of c we use
\chordmode {c:7}
Does exist any way to make the same thing but starting from a variable
containing a note?
Something like this:
mynote = {c}
\chordmode { \mynote:7 }
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond
Thomas Morley writes:
> Well, LilyPond uses an input-language, I don't think it qualifies as a
> programming-language.
> But you you can do a lot
>
> xx = \override NoteHead.color = #red
> is one expression
> yy = \override NoteHead.font-size = #5
> is one
2016-04-19 23:25 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> Thank you all for your help on this.
>
> My original question, "how does Lilypond recognize the end of the
> definition of a variable" has been answered: the definition has to be a
> single, complete
Thank you all for your help on this.
My original question, "how does Lilypond recognize the end of the
definition of a variable" has been answered: the definition has to be a
single, complete expression.
Which of course produces another question: "what is classed as a single
exp
David Wright writes:
> violin = \new Voice b
> you can substitute again, this time for "b".
> (Within limits: contexts have a parent/child ordering, so Staff
> can contain Voice but not vice versa.)
Semantically not, but syntactically this is not a problem:
\relative
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-04/msg00465.html
> ... But it's recursive.
what does that mean? - J.W.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
; and/or the $(if condition action) structure provided by David Kastrup, I
>> > found that there is something very, very basic that I have never really
>> > understood.
>> >
>> > So at the risk of embarrassing myself, I should be grateful if somebody
>> > woul
On Tue 19 Apr 2016 at 19:38:14 (+0100), David Sumbler wrote:
> So at the risk of embarrassing myself, I should be grateful if somebody
> would explain the following: how does Lilypond recognize the end of a
> variable definition?
Oversimplifying, there are about four things you c
condition action) structure provided by David Kastrup, I
>> > found that there is something very, very basic that I have never really
>> > understood.
>> >
>> > So at the risk of embarrassing myself, I should be grateful if somebody
>> > would explain th
there is something very, very basic that I have never really
> > understood.
> >
> > So at the risk of embarrassing myself, I should be grateful if somebody
> > would explain the following: how does Lilypond recognize the end of a
> > variable definitio
>
> So at the risk of embarrassing myself, I should be grateful if somebody
> would explain the following: how does Lilypond recognize the end of a
> variable definition?
One expression.
> For instance, an example from the documentation shows:
>
> violin = \new
would explain the following: how does Lilypond recognize the end of a
variable definition?
For instance, an example from the documentation shows:
violin = \new Staff {
\relative {
a'4 b c b
}
}
cello = \new Staff {
\relative {
\clef "bass"
e2 d
}
}
What I don't
2016-04-15 11:06 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari :
> I writing some accordion scores and for this reason I'm trying to create the
> lilypond tools that will make the task more easy.
>
> I started writing the following vaiables:
>
> cC = {c4}
> cc = \chordmode {c4}
> ccC = { \new
I writing some accordion scores and for this reason I'm trying to create
the lilypond tools that will make the task more easy.
I started writing the following vaiables:
cC = {c4}
cc = \chordmode {c4}
ccC = { \new Voice << {\cC} {\cc}>>}%first solution
(In the attached image you can see an
gt; grob
> >>> internally calculate its own control points rather than relying on it
> >>> being
> >>> calculated elsewhere (also attached):
> >>
> >> Works great! I improved it further by making it compatible with ties
> too:
> >>
>
ess property and having each grob
>>> internally calculate its own control points rather than relying on it
>>> being
>>> calculated elsewhere (also attached):
>>
>> Works great! I improved it further by making it compatible with ties too:
>>
>>
>>
On Thu 10 Mar 2016 at 10:19:29 (-0600), Cynthia Karl wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:04:57 -0700 (MST) tisimst
> schrieb:
> >
> > HTH,
> > Abraham
> >
> > P.S. Some of the power users on this list filter inline images, so if you
> > wouldn't mind making the image an
n relying on it
>> being
>> calculated elsewhere (also attached):
>
> Works great! I improved it further by making it compatible with ties too:
>
>
> #(define (variable-slur-thickness min-l max-l min-t max-t) (lambda (grob)
> (let* ((cpf (if (grob::has-interface
eat! I improved it further by making it compatible with ties too:
#(define (variable-slur-thickness min-l max-l min-t max-t) (lambda (grob)
(let* ((cpf (if (grob::has-interface grob 'tie-interface)
ly:tie::calc-control-points
ly:slur::calc-control-points))
alculate its own control points rather than relying on it being
calculated elsewhere (also attached):
\version "2.19.36"
#(define (variable-slur-thickness min-l max-l min-t max-t) (lambda (grob)
(let* ((cpt (ly:slur::calc-control-points grob))
(cp0 (car cpt))
2016-03-11 10:23 GMT+01:00 Sharon Rosner :
>> This problem arose before.
>> One needs to set 'thickness before-line-breaking, but then you don't
>> have access to the control-points, as far as I remember.
>> I'm not sure there is any way, have to think about it.
>
> Can you
> This problem arose before.
> One needs to set 'thickness before-line-breaking, but then you don't
> have access to the control-points, as far as I remember.
> I'm not sure there is any way, have to think about it.
Can you explain what’s going on? As far as I could tell from debugging the
2016-03-11 10:01 GMT+01:00 Sharon Rosner :
>> Thus again: how should it look, in cases where a broken slur has a
>> (very) long and a (very) short part?
>> Some average-thickness? Or something else?
>
> The problem is not with the broken slurs, but rather with the other slurs
>
16, 17-19, 20-23
etc.
Thanks
Sharon
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Variable-slur-thickness-tp188374p188431.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-use
2016-03-11 1:18 GMT+01:00 Sharon Rosner <cico...@gmail.com>:
>> How should it look in situations like below?
>>
>> \score {
>> { c'1( \break d') \repeat unfold 12 { d' \noBreak } c'( \break c' d' c' d') }
>> \layout {
>> \override Slur.after-line-bre
> How should it look in situations like below?
>
> \score {
> { c'1( \break d') \repeat unfold 12 { d' \noBreak } c'( \break c' d' c' d') }
> \layout {
> \override Slur.after-line-breaking = #(variable-slur-thickness 3 10 1.4
> 12.7)
> }
> }
I created something
> Sharon
How should it look in situations like below?
\score {
{ c'1( \break d') \repeat unfold 12 { d' \noBreak } c'( \break c' d' c' d') }
\layout {
\override Slur.after-line-breaking = #(variable-slur-thickness 3 10 1.4 12.7)
}
}
Cheers,
Harm
_
Hi Abraham,
Putting this code into actual use, I found a show stopper. After a line
break, the slur thickness stops being adjusted and reflects the default
thickness value.
Any idea?
Sharon
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Variable-slur-thickness
lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1028
>> >
>>
>> The header of the third score isn’t correct: Thickness goes from 1.2 to
>> 2.7, not 1.4 to 2.7.
>
>
> (facepalm) Thanks. Corrected.
>
> - Abraham
Hi Abraham,
I had a look.
Pretty nice one, some nitpicks, though.
At 10:56 10/03/2016 -0600, Matthew Skala wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Brian Barker wrote:
At 10:33 10/03/2016 -0600, Matthew Skala wrote:
... HTML in email is usually spam.
You are joking, of course!
No.
OK, I'll rephrase that to help you: either you *have to be* joking or
you are plain
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Brian Barker wrote:
> At 10:33 10/03/2016 -0600, Matthew Skala wrote:
> > ... HTML in email is usually spam.
>
> You are joking, of course!
No.
--
Matthew Skala
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
At 10:33 10/03/2016 -0600, Matthew Skala wrote:
... HTML in email is usually spam.
You are joking, of course!
Brian Barker
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
now that some other regular list followers have mentioned this in the
past. Perhaps doing both is how to satisfy both worlds, like you said?
Best,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Inline-images-was-Re-Variable-slur-thickness-tp188389p188391.html
Sent
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Cynthia Karl wrote:
> Why on earth would anyone filter inline images?
I filter HTML, because HTML in email is usually spam. "Inline" images
imply HTML and thus get filtered too.
--
Matthew Skala
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles.
achment.html was
> not found on this server.
That’s not very convenient at all. Am I the only one with this problem?
What’s the solution?
Maybe it would be nice if inline images were also added as attachments?
Regards,
Pat Karl
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> ht
correct: Thickness goes from 1.2 to
> 2.7, not 1.4 to 2.7.
>
(facepalm) Thanks. Corrected.
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Variable-slur-thickness-tp188374p188388.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com._
Am 10.03.2016 um 16:56 schrieb tisimst:
Submitted to LSR: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1028
The header of the third score isn’t correct: Thickness goes from 1.2 to
2.7, not 1.4 to 2.7.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
e solution:
>>
>> Fantastic! I refactored the code to make it easier to change the
>> parameters:
>>
>
> +1. Nicely refactored.
>
Submitted to LSR: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1028
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.na
;
+1. Nicely refactored.
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Variable-slur-thickness-tp188374p188379.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lil
> I was thinking about this just yesterday. Here's a reasonable solution:
Fantastic! I refactored the code to make it easier to change the parameters:
#(define (variable-slur-thickness min-l max-l min-t max-t) (lambda (grob)
(let* ((cpt (ly:grob-property grob 'control-points))
(
" th)
;(format #t "newth: ~a\n" newth)
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'thickness newth)
))
}
%%
HTH,
Abraham
P.S. Some of the power users on this list filter inline images, so if you
wouldn't mind making the image an attachment next time, I know they'll
appreciate i
Hi All
The following example shows slurs of variable length, engraved using a
bigger than normal thickness. The first slur looks a bit too thick, and I'm
having a hard time balancing the slur thickness so both short and long slurs
would look good.
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/f
Vaughan McAlley <vaug...@mcalley.net.au> writes:
> Greetings,
>
> I’d like to be able to specify at the top of my main score which
> movements are printed. I can store a \bookpart in a variable, but I
> can’t seem to return it from a scheme expression. Is there a bookpart
&
I’d like to be able to specify at the top of my main score which
movements are printed. I can store a \bookpart in a variable, but I
can’t seem to return it from a scheme expression. Is there a bookpart
equivalent to define-music-function that I haven’t found?
Vaughan
%%
\version &
;>> Le 25 févr. 2016 à 00:48, Vaughan McAlley <vaug...@mcalley.net.au> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I’d like to be able to specify at the top of my main score which
>>> movements are printed. I can store a \bookpart in a variable, but I
>&
t;
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I’d like to be able to specify at the top of my main score which
>> movements are printed. I can store a \bookpart in a variable, but I
>> can’t seem to return it from a scheme expression. Is there a bookpart
>> equivalent to define-mus
I can store a \bookpart in a variable, but I
> can’t seem to return it from a scheme expression. Is there a bookpart
> equivalent to define-music-function that I haven’t found?
>
> Vaughan
>
>
> %%
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> compil
Greetings,
I’d like to be able to specify at the top of my main score which
movements are printed. I can store a \bookpart in a variable, but I
can’t seem to return it from a scheme expression. Is there a bookpart
equivalent to define-music-function that I haven’t found?
Vaughan
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 02.02.2016 um 00:44 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> In this code "format" receives "fmt" (the format strings) and "vals" -
>>> the *list* of arguments.
>>> How should I modify this so "format" doesn't
Hi,
I'm hitting a wall with Scheme once more.
I need to create wrapper functions around (format) and other functions
that need a variable number of arguments.
I know that with
#(define (my-proc fmt . vals)
"vals" will be an arbitrary number of arguments that will be wrapped
Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hitting a wall with Scheme once more.
> I need to create wrapper functions around (format) and other functions
> that need a variable number of arguments.
>
> I know that with
>
> #(defi
t; that a non-alpha separator is good to have, but two different
>> separators may quickly become confusing. Is it 'set_variable' or
>> 'set-variable'?
>>
>> Given the relation between LP and Guile, I'd suggest to only allow the
>> dash and disallow the underscore (by syn
I assume there have been discussions on extending the syntax for LP
identifiers to include dashes and underscores. My personal opinion is that
a non-alpha separator is good to have, but two different separators may
quickly become confusing. Is it 'set_variable' or 'set-variable'?
Given
may quickly become confusing. Is it 'set_variable' or
> 'set-variable'?
>
> Given the relation between LP and Guile, I'd suggest to only allow the
> dash and disallow the underscore (by syntax rule, not just by
> convention).
[...]
I think extending identifiers to include '-' and '_' is
olve enumeration, and Arabic numbers are out of the question. So I
have a legend at the top of each include file describing what my
nomenclature means:
% Trichord Variable Names
% 012: A
% 013: B
% 014: C
% 015: D
% 016
in half-hours here and there: learning enough
> scheme to do this is impractical. So in the meantime, I basically have
> to give each three-note motive a variable with a coded name that allows
> sufficient differentiation and can be searched reasonably easily.
> Variables with Arabic nume
> > Using the syntax with quotes is rather ugly, I agree. But it is
> > nonetheless potentially useful for two reasons:
> > (1) it enables us to use numbers etc. in variable names
> Why would that be desirable?
Suppose you make an edition of the St Matthew Passion, in which
On 04.01.2016 08:02, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 21:36:30 +0100
Simon Albrecht wrote:
No, for the simple reasons that a) noone mentioned on the list there was
a tracker item and b) even though I know now, I have been unable to
find it.
May I kindly request
Hello Paul,
Thanks a lot for the informatin and links, things are much clearer to me now.
JM
> Le 3 janv. 2016 à 20:51, Paul Morris a écrit :
>
>> On Jan 3, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Menu Jacques wrote:
>>
>> A newbie question: what are the expected
On 04.01.2016 03:29, David Wright wrote:
... but it does mean that you can't use \addlyrics, and dispense with
naming the context when not required (ie simple cases).
True, I deliberately left that one out, since it’s error-prone.
Yours, Simon
___
rings?
Um, let's see: Ruby, PHP, Javascript (as of ES6), Swift, Scala, C#, Perl. Ah
yes I forgot, Perl is not a _real_ programming language ;-)
Sharon
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Strings-as-variable-names-tp185113p185529.html
Sent from the User
Thank you for the reminder, so he is a complete, however abridged version
of my code:
viola = \new Voice \relative c' {
c1 c1 c1
}
recorder = \new Voice \relative c' {
c1 c1 c1
}
verseOne = \lyricmode {
m -- -- --
}
\score {
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff <<
\new Voice \global
\new
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 21:16:27 +0100
David Kastrup wrote:
> Johan Vromans writes:
> > Is this going to be taken seriously or can I spare the efforts?
> There is a tracker issue for it and some discussion. [..] Have you
> followed the discussion in the
On 03.01.2016 21:34, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 21:16:27 +0100
David Kastrup wrote:
Johan Vromans writes:
Is this going to be taken seriously or can I spare the efforts?
There is a tracker issue for it and some discussion. [..] Have you
Hello Ryan,
please always reply on-list. Others may find the solution helpful as well.
Also, please send complete compilable examples (with a version
statement), else it’s difficult to figure out the problem.
That said: The following code works for me.
%%
\version "2.18.2"
global = {
On Mon 04 Jan 2016 at 00:26:44 (+0100), Simon Albrecht wrote:
[...]
> That said: The following code works for me.
>
> %%
> \version "2.18.2"
> global = { s1 }
> recorder = { c''1 }
> verseOne = \lyricmode { test }
> \score {
> \new StaffGroup <<
>
> \new Staff <<
> \new Voice
On Sun 03 Jan 2016 at 16:22:29 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote:
> David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> writes:
>
> > On Mon 28 Dec 2015 at 20:27:22 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote:
> >>
> >> The strings in Python's regular expression replacements can interpo
On Sun 03 Jan 2016 at 15:33:39 (-0800), Ryan Michael wrote:
> Thank you for the reminder, so he is a complete, however abridged version of
> my
> code:
>
> viola = \new Voice \relative c' {
> c1 c1 c1
> }
>
> recorder = \new Voice \relative c' {
> c1 c1 c1
> }
>
> verseOne = \lyricmode {
>
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 21:36:30 +0100
Simon Albrecht wrote:
> > No, for the simple reasons that a) noone mentioned on the list there was
> > a tracker item and b) even though I know now, I have been unable to
> > find it.
> >
> > May I kindly request mentioning the URL to the
and
> juxtaposed with other double-quoted strings they combine into a larger
> string I believe. But that's only for preprocessor constants, and those
> are not really part of the language proper.
>
> The strings in Python's regular expression replacements can interpolate
> va
David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> writes:
> On Mon 28 Dec 2015 at 20:27:22 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> The strings in Python's regular expression replacements can interpolate
>> variable values, but those are not part of the string syntax but of the
>
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 10:06 AM, David Wright wrote:
>
> Recognising the lack of this construct, python is currently adding string
> interpolation to the language.
Looks like a trend as Javascript also got it in the ECMAscript 2015
specification:
Hello folks,
A happy new year 2016 to everybody!
A newbie question: what are the expected benefits and challenges of moving from
guile 1.8.x to guile 2.y?
JM
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I have the following lilypond code:
\score {
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff << \global \recorder >>
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "recorder" {
\verseOne
}
\new Staff << \global \viola >>
>>
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
However I get the error:
*cannot find Voice `recorder'*
On 03.01.2016 20:40, Ryan Michael wrote:
I have the following lilypond code:
\score {
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff << \global \recorder >>
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "recorder" {
\verseOne
}
\new Staff << \global \viola >>
>>
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
\lyricsto
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Menu Jacques wrote:
>
> A newbie question: what are the expected benefits and challenges of moving
> from guile 1.8.x to guile 2.y?
As I understand it, guile 2.0 introduced significant performance improvements,
mainly for compiled scheme, but
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:28:58 +0100
Johan Vromans wrote:
> NR refers to
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/organizing-pieces-with-variables
> which does not mention the quoted syntax, and explicitly disallows dashes
> and underscores.
>
> ===
Johan Vromans writes:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:28:58 +0100
> Johan Vromans wrote:
>
>> NR refers to
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/organizing-pieces-with-variables
>> which does not mention the quoted syntax, and
Hi David,
> the name define-music-function renders the "Extending LilyPond”
> guide ineligible for the Nobel Prize in Literature.
Oh, is *that* what’s keeping us out of the running?? :)
Thanks for the giggle!
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website:
Johan Vromans writes:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:04:37 +0100
> David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> You conveniently snipped shells so that you could mention them again.
>
> You can find a lot more on
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_interpolation
About a third of
401 - 500 of 835 matches
Mail list logo