On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> On 21 Sep 2010, at 14:54, Dave Martin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Jamie Bennett
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tagging bugs is not only good practice but makes tracking and sorting so
>>> much easier. With
>>
>> Maybe
Sounds great!
I'll certainly volunteer for the ALIP side of things as well helping out with
Beagle and Beagle XM.
I have some very very simple unit tests identified for ALIP at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/Heads/ALIP
Regards,
Tom
"We want great men who, when fortune frowns
On 27 Sep 2010, at 23:12, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> Great initiative!
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:56:10PM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>> * OMAP3 Headless
>> * OMAP3 ALIP
>> * OMAP3 Plasma Handset
>> * OMAP3 EFL Netbook
>> * Versatile Express Headless
>> * UX500 Headless
>>
>> an
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:30:42AM +0100, Ian Smith wrote:
> Status report:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Status/2010-09-23
> Burndown
> chart:http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/linaro-infrastructure.html
>
>
> The burndown chart shows that a number of wo
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have only 43 (or 42 depending on your timezone) days until the Linaro
> final release [1] and
> as we get closer, the need for more structured testing is essential. An
> idea that has been
> incubating for some time is to have a we
Great initiative!
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:56:10PM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> * OMAP3 Headless
> * OMAP3 ALIP
> * OMAP3 Plasma Handset
> * OMAP3 EFL Netbook
> * Versatile Express Headless
> * UX500 Headless
>
> and in conjunction with a hardware pack from:
>
> http://jameswest
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> The other alternative is to change our tag names to be unique -- i.e.
> prefixed with linaro-, so i.e. linaro-igep -- and then get somebody in
> Launchpad to implement searching for tagged bugs across all projects
> registered.
Yeah, it's a b
Hi,
We have only 43 (or 42 depending on your timezone) days until the Linaro final
release [1] and
as we get closer, the need for more structured testing is essential. An idea
that has been
incubating for some time is to have a weekly 'test day' where individuals can
spend a couple
of hours d
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:28:45PM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Sure. The pillar name is passed in when calling the script so could be
> any project. Getting a list of these projects is a good idea but will
> need to be maintained.
Here's a stab at a first set:
* ubuntu
* linaro
* li
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:26:17 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010, James Westby wrote:
> > Did you file these bugs?
>
> I wasn't quite sure where to file it, so I just filed it under bugsy
> at:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugsy/+bug/649277
> and subscribed you
Thanks, I'll take
On 27 Sep 2010, at 21:22, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:10:49PM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>> The script is at:
>>
>> http://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jamiebennett/+junk/bug-track
>>
>> (beware, its very early days and it isn't the greatest code, tags need
>> to be
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010, James Westby wrote:
> Did you file these bugs?
I wasn't quite sure where to file it, so I just filed it under bugsy
at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugsy/+bug/649277
and subscribed you
Thanks
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-dev m
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:10:49PM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> The script is at:
>
> http://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jamiebennett/+junk/bug-track
>
> (beware, its very early days and it isn't the greatest code, tags need
> to be passed in rather than hard-coded e.t.c)
Nice job!
You probably w
On 21 Sep 2010, at 14:54, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Jamie Bennett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tagging bugs is not only good practice but makes tracking and sorting so
>> much easier. With
>
> Maybe we could also pull out some metrics, such as numbers of bug with
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:35:54 -0400, James Westby
wrote:
> Please file the bugs against lexbuilder, and assign them to the
> linaro-infrastructure team for further investigation.
Hi,
Did you file these bugs?
Thanks,
James
___
linaro-dev mailing list
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 07:52 -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 09/25/2010 12:26 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just sent these patch series to linux-omap upstream. These patch series
> > fixes
> > and improves the support for IGEP v2 board and I think could be interesting
> > t
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> This is how I felt as well, but I recall some people argued in favor of
> having linux-linaro in main; not sure why anymore. It might have been
> asac, Cc:ing him.
>
> (I had also passed this demotion proposal to Jamie and John, but I'm
>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
> The packages that are directly maintained by the kernel team should
> all be in main. I suspect linux-linaro _should_ be in universe since
> it is not strictly subject to SRU criteria and it is not maintained
> by the kernel team.
This is how I felt as w
On 09/25/2010 12:26 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just sent these patch series to linux-omap upstream. These patch series
> fixes
> and improves the support for IGEP v2 board and I think could be interesting
> to include in Maverick and linaro 2.6.35. Please consider to add, tha
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:44 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > a) unpack the binary tarball to a tmp dir, install the hwpack (which
> > may cause lots of data to be written) and then move that to the SD card
> > or
> > b) unpack the tar
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hey folks
>
> I'd like to mirror and test the latest build of
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-headless/
>
> but I have two issues with this:
> * having some kind of direct link to the latest image so that I don't
>
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> a) unpack the binary tarball to a tmp dir, install the hwpack (which
> may cause lots of data to be written) and then move that to the SD card
> or
> b) unpack the tarball straight into the sd card (as is done currently)
> and then inst
22 matches
Mail list logo
