Re: reorganzing the lava projects on launchpad

2011-05-19 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@linaro.org wrote: Hi there, Some of you know about this already as it was discussed a bit at LDS, but probably not very inclusively. We have a slightly strange arrangement of projects on Launchpad, with the main ones being

[STATUS] Graphics status 18/5

2011-05-19 Thread Ilias Biris
Hi here is the status for Graphics WG for wk20. https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Status/2011-05-18 Highlights: - Working on 11.11 blueprint specs - Finishing off tasks for 11.05: # Cairo maintainer has committed the patches provided by Alexandros upstream # Compositor

Re: reorganzing the lava projects on launchpad

2011-05-19 Thread Dave Pigott
On 19 May 2011, at 08:08, Alexander Sack wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@linaro.org wrote: Hi there, Some of you know about this already as it was discussed a bit at LDS, but probably not very inclusively. We have a slightly strange

Re: approaching a final kernel for 11.05

2011-05-19 Thread Andy Green (林安廸)
On 05/19/2011 12:05 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:58:22PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, John Rigbyjohn.ri...@linaro.org wrote: Thanks to the heroic efforts of rsalveti the packaged linux-linaro-omap kernel now

Re: reorganzing the lava projects on launchpad

2011-05-19 Thread Zygmunt Bazyli Krynicki
Thanks for tackling this. I am positive on almost all the suggested names here ... Does this mean that we want to rename abrek to lava-test-tool? Paul, what does abrek stand for? It's the name of certain space-faring dog. Best regards ZK ___

Re: reorganzing the lava projects on launchpad

2011-05-19 Thread Dave Pigott
I thought Abrek was a monkey? If we're talking Soviet space program animals anyway. :) Dave On 19 May 2011, at 08:52, Zygmunt Bazyli Krynicki wrote: Thanks for tackling this. I am positive on almost all the suggested names here ... Does this mean that we want to rename abrek to

[PATCH v3 2/2] ARMV7: MMC SPL Boot support for SMDKV310 board

2011-05-19 Thread Chander Kashyap
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is based on nand_spl support. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org --- Changes for v3: - spl file renamed to u-boot-mmc-spl.bin - spl directory renamed to mmc_spl - comments added in

[PATCH v3 0/2] SMDKV310 Board Support

2011-05-19 Thread Chander Kashyap
Hi, This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code. Specific changes in PATCH v3 are mention in specific patch files. Chander Kashyap (2): ARMV7: Add support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board

Re: Usefulness of GCC's 64bit __sync_* ops on ARM

2011-05-19 Thread Ken Werner
On 05/19/2011 12:40 PM, David Rusling wrote: Is this going to end up in a blueprint? This is the last loose end of SMP / atomic memory operations work and I'd like to see it happen Hi, Yep, there is one (kind of a skeleton) in place at:

Problem booting IGEP when using device tree

2011-05-19 Thread Grant Likely
Hi Kevin and Paul, Would either of you mind looking at this bug report? On the IGEP, when booting with DT is used, something appears to get messed up with initializing the clocks. In this case, the device tree isn't actually doing anything other than replacing ATAGs for passing memory size,

Re: Usefulness of GCC's 64bit __sync_* ops on ARM

2011-05-19 Thread David Gilbert
On 19 May 2011 16:49, Ken Werner k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 05/19/2011 12:40 PM, David Rusling wrote: Is this going to end up in a blueprint?   This is the last loose end of SMP / atomic memory operations work and I'd like to see it happen Hi, Yep, there is one (kind of a skeleton)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/2] SMDKV310 Board Support

2011-05-19 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Chander Kashyap, In message 1305796982-7155-1-git-send-email-chander.kash...@linaro.org you wrote: This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code. Which patchset? I see only this

Re: [STATUS] Android Platform Team 2011-05-18

2011-05-19 Thread Zach Pfeffer
Here's a link the works. Sorry for sending a bad link. https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Status/2011-05-19 On 18 May 2011 17:06, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote: See: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Status/2011-05-18 Highlights: 1. Android Panda LEB GFX being

Re: [Samsung] [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/2] SMDKV310 Board Support

2011-05-19 Thread Angus Ainslie
Hi Wolfgang On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: Dear Chander Kashyap, In message 1305796982-7155-1-git-send-email-chander.kash...@linaro.org you wrote: This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very similar to

Re: [Samsung] [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/2] SMDKV310 Board Support

2011-05-19 Thread Scott Bambrough
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 21:00 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Chander Kashyap, In message 1305796982-7155-1-git-send-email-chander.kash...@linaro.org you wrote: This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we

Re: [Samsung] [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/2] SMDKV310 Board Support

2011-05-19 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Angus Ainslie, In message banlktimazgvhlrg7fdeh1mokzwco9fc...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: Which patchset? I see only this cover letter, but neither patch 1/2 nor patch 2.2 ? It looks like they ended up in a different thread. I found them. You also had the linaro-dev list on Cc:, and

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARMV7: MMC SPL Boot support for SMDKV310 board

2011-05-19 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Chander Kashyap, In message 1305796982-7155-3-git-send-email-chander.kash...@linaro.org you wrote: Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is based on nand_spl support. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org Checkpatch says: WARNING: line

Re: Gerrit userstory for multi-branch development

2011-05-19 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Linus, On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:07:50 +0200 Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: 2011/5/16 Paul Sokolovsky paul.sokolov...@linaro.org: You expressed concern that Gerrit is not too flexible for working with multiple topic branches, in particular, that it enforces work

Re: Problem booting IGEP when using device tree

2011-05-19 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Grant Likely wrote: Would either of you mind looking at this bug report? On the IGEP, when booting with DT is used, something appears to get messed up with initializing the clocks. In this case, the device tree isn't actually doing anything other than replacing ATAGs

Re: Gerrit userstory for multi-branch development

2011-05-19 Thread Peter Maydell
On 19 May 2011 23:01, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: Well, so bottom line of this, as far as I see it, is: Gerrit is de facto tool for Android, and for Linaro Android we'd like to be sure that it supports more

[PATCH] arm/dt: Add ST-Ericsson u8500 device tree support

2011-05-19 Thread Grant Likely
Adds support for passing a device tree for booting the u8500 board. Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca --- Completely untested. Not even compiled. Per, this should be all you need to change in the kernel to get DT support working on the u8500. g.

Re: 1105 delivery of pm, multimedia, graphics

2011-05-19 Thread Barry Song
Hi Amit, Thanks very much for your reply. 2011/5/20 Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org: On 11 May 19, Barry Song wrote: Hi all, it is easy to get toolchain/uboot/kernel/android source codes. but i have been really searching all over the website but still fail to get source codes of

[PATCH v4 0/2] SMDKV310 Board Support

2011-05-19 Thread Chander Kashyap
Hi, This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code. Specific changes in PATCH v3 are mentioned in specific patch files. Chander Kashyap (2): ARMV7: Add support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board

[PATCH v4 1/2] ARMV7: Add support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board

2011-05-19 Thread Chander Kashyap
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much similar to S5PC210. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera tushar.beh...@linaro.org --- Changes for v2: - Coding Style Cleanup - Removed unwanted macros from board

[PATCH v4 2/2] ARMV7: MMC SPL Boot support for SMDKV310 board

2011-05-19 Thread Chander Kashyap
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is based on nand_spl support. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org --- Changes for v3: - spl file renamed to u-boot-mmc-spl.bin - spl directory renamed to mmc_spl - comments added in

u-boot: initial support for smsc95xx and TFTP boot at Panda

2011-05-19 Thread Ricardo Salveti
Hi John, Today I was trying to see if I could get the ethernet driver to work with Panda, so we could try TFTP support. Most of the patches are posted at the u-boot m-l already, that consist of the smsc95xx driver and EHCI support for Panda. With all these patches, and using the x-loader

Re: u-boot: initial support for smsc95xx and TFTP boot at Panda

2011-05-19 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Ricardo Salveti wrote: Hi John, Today I was trying to see if I could get the ethernet driver to work with Panda, so we could try TFTP support. Most of the patches are posted at the u-boot m-l already, that consist of the smsc95xx driver and EHCI support for Panda.